Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Iodine, again

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Chuck:

I actually was not sure about the exact dosage when I typed that email, but was

in a hurry to get to work and did not have time to go downstairs and check the

bottle---the dose that I was taking from Feb 2007 until Dec 23rd 2010 was 50mg

elemental iodine per day. Upon reading the book by Dr Kharrazian, I became so

concerned that I had been poisoning myself, that I stopped cold turkey. I was

not feeling great when I did stop, but I really feel crappy now--and my

cognition and digestion, lack of sleep---etc--all my symptoms are back in a

rage.

I actually did feel very good once I got to the 50mg daily dose, and your point

about accelerating was likely what I had been experiencing while on it.

I am actually waiting for a practitioner to become trained in Dr Kharrazian's

approach so I can begin treatment.

To get back to iodine, though, I too have read many conflicting reports about

iodine and resisted taking in for years until my women's health practitioner

convinced me to try it. It was because I did feel a lot better, and actually did

not have heart palps, or thyroid hot flashes, and could concentrate and get

things done so much more effectively that I did choose to continue. I just wish

I knew where to turn here. I do not wish to destroy the thyroid I have left,

since I've had this disease since I was 17 yrs old and am now 54. I was force

fed banana flakes and soy milk as an infant, because I was losing weight and

could not hold the cow's milk formula down when I was 5 months old, and my mom

and doctor told me I was dying. I immediately put on pounds and was the fattest

baby on the block--with three chins. I'm pretty sure that soy and banana were

not the best curative for me. So, my health problems go a long way back.

In past discussions about taking supplements, many contributors here have stood

by the theory that if taking something makes you feel better, then take it. In

the case of being a long time thyroid sufferer, feeling better is like a gift

and is very precious, and many doctors are highly undereducated, or also

arrogant and narrow-minded, so we often are forced to research and try what we

feel could work, within reason, of course. Doctors try things on patients

anyway, and we have to pay for each bottle, and if it doesn't work, then we get

to try another and pay more. Based on the reaction my body had aside from any

scientific finding, I honestly did feel a good 40% better while on the 50mg

dose. I hate to be a crazy one here, but it's true. Once I got past the first

three weeks, it was worth it to keep taking it.

So now I feel like I'm back to square one, and sick all over again.

I do apologize for bringing up such a topic, but I do value your opinion and was

also wondering if you are acquainted with the book I mentioned, and if so, what

you thought about the iodine research he did.

Thanks again.

O'Connell

Iodine, again

,

You wrote:

>

> I would very much appreciate your opinion on the theory that a

> therapeutic dose of iodine, specifically Iodoral at 75mg per day, has

> been scientifically found to increase thyroid problems in the auto

> immune disease, Hashimoto's Thyroiditis. I'm referring to the writings

> of Dr. Datis Kharrazian.

That is a substantial dose, about 500 times the recommended daily intake

and about 75 times the safe upper limit. Are you sure you don't mean 75

mcg?

Many many studies have shown that doses at much lower levels, close to

the limit, do indeed seem to aggravate or even bring on Hashimoto's.

However, if you are already way down the hypoT road, this may not

necessarily be a bad thing. Iodine could accelerate the process, getting

you more quickly to a stable, replacement dose. When that happens, the

antibodies and peripheral symptoms can go away.

That is not a good enough reason to recommend large overdosing of iodine

by itself, and 75 mg could induce pseudo allergic reactions. The

threshold for these potentially life threatening conditions is around 3

mg per day. If you can get to that dose without an adverse reaction, you

are probably safe to go higher. However, I am highly skeptical that any

benefits accrue from such massive doses.

We have had lots of iodine advocates on this list who think the opposite

and recommend up to 100 mg per day. As I said, they have failed to

convince me. In fact, I suspect that massive doses of iodine may even be

addictive.

Chuck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

,

You wrote:

>

>

> In past discussions about taking supplements, many contributors here

> have stood by the theory that if taking something makes you feel better,

> then take it....

Many addictive substances make you feel better in the short term but

eventually cause a downside. I just don't know whether iodine is like

that. The literature all points to problems in the short term, even from

modest doses, so very few have tested long term effects of high doses.

You are definitely past the 3 mg allergy threshold, which was my biggest

concern. So, continuing at your highest dose will probably not damage

anything except what is left of your thyroid or your pocketbook.

One possible effect you may have experienced while ramping up the dosage

is a temporary reduction in T3 due to the Wolff-Chaikoff effect. If your

heart palpitations and hot flashes were actually due to hyperT, then

this effect could be producing relief. So would a reduction in thyroid

output from progression of the Hashi's. Unfortunately, these would be

only temporary help, until things stabilized.

If you are having hyperT symptoms, why not simply try a reduction in

thyroid dosage?

Chuck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chuck

Interesting that you would mention lowering my thyroid dosage, since on December

26th I began taking half of the 130 mg of the Westin Nature-throid that I've

been on since 2007, so I've been on 65mg and feeling worse and worse everyday

since then. So, I'm now completely off of any supplemental iodine and half of my

thyroid meds and feeling like I'm in slow motion with my head and body feeling

like they weigh a ton.

I am pursuing options here in my area and have been trying to get a referral to

see a specialist who does carry my health insurance, but I have to see my

primary care provider first. You know the drill, I'm sure. So, hopefully after

the information I received from the office assistant there, I can use the proper

terminology to get the referral. They have to approve it for reasons that fit

within their box of words. red tape

To speak to the long term effects of high doses, even though from Feb 2007 until

December 2010 is not too terribly long, I can tell you that for me, taking 50mg

of elemental iodine with ATP Co-Factors everyday, along with other vitamin and

mineral supplements like Vitamin D3, I really felt good. I mean, close to

normal. Sleeping, able to think well, stamina, aches and pains were much fewer

and less intense, very few headaches, no episodes of heating up and getting

suddenly flushed, no heart palps, dryness in my eyes very much relieved,

digestion much improved and really able to get on with my day and feel good.

It doesn't make any sense to me that if iodine is supposed to be toxic for the

Hashi's sufferer, why did I feel so good for so long?

By the way, I was admitted to a hospital December 21st, 2010, with classic heart

attack symptoms. One of the tests they did was to do an imaging test using

iodine given thru an IV. Not ONE person asked me about Hashi's, and I DID tell

them about it. The techs administrating the test simply asked if I was allergic

to iodine, and I had no reason to believe I was, since I was taking it everyday.

Could you please elaborate on what you meant when you said " until things

stabilized " ?

Thank you, Chuck

O'Connell, Owner/Operator

Cloud Nine Therapeutics, LLC

10555 Montgomery Blvd NE

Building #3, Suite 160A

Albuquerque, NM 87111

505.298.9000

Re: Iodine, again

,

You wrote:

>

>

> In past discussions about taking supplements, many contributors here

> have stood by the theory that if taking something makes you feel better,

> then take it....

Many addictive substances make you feel better in the short term but

eventually cause a downside. I just don't know whether iodine is like

that. The literature all points to problems in the short term, even from

modest doses, so very few have tested long term effects of high doses.

You are definitely past the 3 mg allergy threshold, which was my biggest

concern. So, continuing at your highest dose will probably not damage

anything except what is left of your thyroid or your pocketbook.

One possible effect you may have experienced while ramping up the dosage

is a temporary reduction in T3 due to the Wolff-Chaikoff effect. If your

heart palpitations and hot flashes were actually due to hyperT, then

this effect could be producing relief. So would a reduction in thyroid

output from progression of the Hashi's. Unfortunately, these would be

only temporary help, until things stabilized.

If you are having hyperT symptoms, why not simply try a reduction in

thyroid dosage?

Chuck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's a mystery that you are not feeling well. You halved your

thyroid dose, and that's the gland that drives your body so if you take away

half of it's fuel it's not going to run very well. On the other hand, if you

take too much, it will impact your heart.

 

 Thyroid has to be handled with care and close attention paid to how you feel on

a daily basis. I've even suggested to people who were having difficulties like

you to keep a daily diary of everything you take, eat and do. I've done that

myself when I was trying to find out what my triggers were for the afib attacks

and it worked very well.

<>Roni

Immortality exists!

It's called knowledge!

 

Just because something isn't seen

doesn't mean it's not there<>

>

>

> In past discussions about taking supplements, many contributors here

> have stood by the theory that if taking something makes you feel better,

> then take it....

Many addictive substances make you feel better in the short term but

eventually cause a downside. I just don't know whether iodine is like

that. The literature all points to problems in the short term, even from

modest doses, so very few have tested long term effects of high doses.

You are definitely past the 3 mg allergy threshold, which was my biggest

concern. So, continuing at your highest dose will probably not damage

anything except what is left of your thyroid or your pocketbook.

One possible effect you may have experienced while ramping up the dosage

is a temporary reduction in T3 due to the Wolff-Chaikoff effect. If your

heart palpitations and hot flashes were actually due to hyperT, then

this effect could be producing relief. So would a reduction in thyroid

output from progression of the Hashi's. Unfortunately, these would be

only temporary help, until things stabilized.

If you are having hyperT symptoms, why not simply try a reduction in

thyroid dosage?

Chuck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

,

You wrote:

>

> It doesn't make any sense to me that if iodine is supposed to be toxic

> for the Hashi's sufferer, why did I feel so good for so long?...

Iodine is only potentially harmful in a phase with active antibodies. If

your thyroid has already been destroyed, the antibodies go away - for

good. Even iodine won't bring them back. That is the state I described

as " stabilized. " It means you get a full replacement dose and rarely

need to adjust it.

Incidentally, your thyroid meds are chock full of iodine. T4 has four

atoms of iodine attached to every molecule. T3 has three. So, the

typical replacement dose comes pretty close to the RDA for iodine all by

itself, on top of what is in your food, which is typically above the

RDA. As T4 and T3 are metabolized, ALL of that iodine goes back into

circulation. If hypoT people really have an iodine deficiency, we would

expect them to retain and store iodine from the meds.

Thus, your 50 mg per day was on top of what you really need for

nutrition. It was acting as a drug, rather than a nutrient. The fact

that many people say this much iodine makes them feel better does not

reassure me. Remember Sigmund Freud, among others, said much the same

thing about cocaine. Laudanum became a very popular " cure " in the 19th

c., and it still is.

>

> By the way, I was admitted to a hospital December 21st, 2010, with

> classic heart attack symptoms. One of the tests they did was to do an

> imaging test using iodine given thru an IV....

That IV is not elemental or even ionic iodine. It is an organic compound

that acts as a contrast agent for X-rays. Since you were already full of

iodine, you probably absorbed very little from the contrast agent.

People with an allergy (actually a pseudo-allergy) to iodine can go into

anaphylactoid shock and die from such injections, since the dye

contributes about 10 mg of iodine in one slug. That is why they ask

about it prior to CAT scans or radiographs.

The risk of aggravating Hashi's antibodies is greatly outweighed by the

risk of misdiagnosing a heart problem, so there is no need to ask about

Hashi's prior to the IV.

Chuck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chuck, is there any support for the existence of iodine addiction other

than anecdotal?

If so [or even if not] can you give any information as to whether the

addiction is [or may be] physiological or whether it is more

psychological; or whether it is some combination?

Thanks,

..

..

> Posted by: " ChuckB " gumboyaya@...

> <mailto:gumboyaya@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Iodine%2C%20again>

> gumbo482001 <gumbo482001>

>

>

> Wed Feb 9, 2011 8:07 am (PST)

>

>

>

> ,

>

> You wrote:

> >

> > It doesn't make any sense to me that if iodine is supposed to be toxic

> > for the Hashi's sufferer, why did I feel so good for so long?...

>

> Iodine is only potentially harmful in a phase with active antibodies. If

> your thyroid has already been destroyed, the antibodies go away - for

> good. Even iodine won't bring them back. That is the state I described

> as " stabilized.

> " It means you get a full replacement dose and rarely

> need to adjust it.

>

> Incidentally, your thyroid meds are chock full of iodine. T4 has four

> atoms of iodine attached to every molecule. T3 has three. So, the

> typical replacement dose comes pretty close to the RDA for iodine all by

> itself, on top of what is in your food, which is typically above the

> RDA. As T4 and T3 are metabolized, ALL of that iodine goes back into

> circulation. If hypoT people really have an iodine deficiency, we would

> expect them to retain and store iodine from the meds.

>

> Thus, your 50 mg per day was on top of what you really need for

> nutrition. It was acting as a drug, rather than a nutrient. The fact

> that many people say this much iodine makes them feel better does not

> reassure me. Remember Sigmund Freud, among others, said much the same

> thing about cocaine. Laudanum became a very popular " cure " in the 19th

> c., and it still is.

>

> >

> > By the way, I was admitted to a hospital December 21st, 2010, with

> > classic heart attack symptoms. One of the tests they did was to do an

> > imaging test using iodine given thru an IV....

>

> That IV is not elemental or even ionic iodine. It is an organic compound

> that acts as a contrast agent for X-rays. Since you were already full of

> iodine, you probably absorbed very little from the contrast agent.

> People with an allergy (actually a pseudo-allergy) to iodine can go into

> anaphylactoid shock and die from such injections, since the dye

> contributes about 10 mg of iodine in one slug. That is why they ask

> about it prior to CAT scans or radiographs.

>

> The risk of aggravating Hashi's antibodies is greatly outweighed by the

> risk of misdiagnosing a heart problem, so there is no need to ask about

> Hashi's prior to the IV.

>

> Chuck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

,

> Chuck, is there any support for the existence of iodine addiction other

> than anecdotal?

I would say not even anecdotal, just my speculation. :)

It would have to have a physiological mechanism, though, to get the rave revues

posted occasionally on this list. Some have discussed the problems with

withdrawal, although they attribute these to recurrence of the iodine

" deficiency. "

Chuck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, a heck a lot of it fits IMHO.

Thanks,

..

..

>

> Posted by: " gumboyaya@... " gumboyaya@...

> <mailto:gumboyaya@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Iodine%2C%20again>

> gumbo482001 <gumbo482001>

>

>

> Fri Feb 11, 2011 1:16 pm (PST)

>

>

>

> ,

>

> > Chuck, is there any support for the existence of iodine addiction other

> > than anecdotal?

>

> I would say not even anecdotal, just my speculation. :)

>

> It would have to have a physiological mechanism, though, to get the

> rave revues posted occasionally on this list. Some have discussed the

> problems with withdrawal, although they attribute these to recurrence

> of the iodine " deficiency. "

>

> Chuck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RDA means really dumb advice--it is the minimum to prevent cretinism--I have no

faith in a recommendation put forth by an entity that actually profits from an

ill populace

and many others feel the same...

Re: Iodine, again

Well, a heck a lot of it fits IMHO.

Thanks,

..

..

>

> Posted by: " gumboyaya@... " gumboyaya@...

> <mailto: gumboyaya@... ?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Iodine%2C%20again>

> gumbo482001 < gumbo482001 >

>

>

> Fri Feb 11, 2011 1:16 pm (PST)

>

>

>

> ,

>

> > Chuck, is there any support for the existence of iodine addiction other

> > than anecdotal?

>

> I would say not even anecdotal, just my speculation. :)

>

> It would have to have a physiological mechanism, though, to get the

> rave revues posted occasionally on this list. Some have discussed the

> problems with withdrawal, although they attribute these to recurrence

> of the iodine " deficiency. "

>

> Chuck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/12/2011 11:53 PM, nmsjoy@... wrote:

>

>

> RDA means really dumb advice--it is the minimum to prevent cretinism--

Actually, it is a minimum nutritional need extrapolated from studies of

goiter incidence. Congenital cretinism results from a more severe

deficiency, so the RDA is much greater than that. Mental retardation

also results from children growing up with an iodine deficiency, so the

RDA is designed to prevent that as well.

There are actually several groups that review and advise on RDAs. The

two that have agreed on iodine are the US Food and Nutrition Board and

the Institute of Medicine. The latter is independent of government and

is one of the National Academies of Science. I fail to see how either of

these groups would profit from your being ill. They base their

recommendations on peer reviewed research, again performed by people who

do not profit from your illness but actually have a stake in treating or

preventing it, since such discoveries bring them grant support.

The recommended daily allowance of iodine ranges from 150 micrograms/day

for adult humans to 290 micrograms/day for lactating mothers. About half

of this is needed to satisfy the thyroid gland and prevent congenital

problems. Most people in the U.S. get several times the RDA in their

diet, which is one reason you can find iodine free table in the stores, now.

The real issue is how much is too much. Every time a government

undertook to prevent goiter in a region by supplementing table salt with

iodine, the incidence of Hashimoto's went up along with a transient

increase in incidence of hyperT. The latter always went away after a few

years. And, these effect occur just around the RDA. The risk and

severity of Hashi's was found to increase with multiples of the RDA.

They found the same effect in several animal studies.

However, this is not the range of suspected addiction. Folks on this

list have recommended daily doses up to 100 times the RDA, which is way

beyond any detectable nutritional need and way beyond what was ever in

the natural human diet. About 20 times the RDA is the threshold for

dangerous anaphylactoid reactions.

Chuck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all put in our two cents worth here. Sometimes we get back change! [ggg]

..

..

>

> Posted by: " nmsjoy@... " nmsjoy@...

> <mailto:nmsjoy@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Iodine%2C%20again>

> radiant505 <radiant505>

>

>

> Sat Feb 12, 2011 9:53 pm (PST)

>

>

>

>

>

> RDA means really dumb advice--it is the minimum to prevent

> cretinism--I have no faith in a recommendation put forth by an entity

> that actually profits from an ill populace

> and many others feel the same...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...