RE: Re: Hypothyroidism = Too Little Hormone Alternatives? What's in a name?

[Guest guest]

Yes Trish and ,

This is exactly why I no longer post to this group. In fact, I have tried to

" unsubscribe " to it without success. I was very put off by the responses from

my very first post - they are not doctors. Or ARE they? Who knows and I don't

care. I sometimes read the posts, but only because it keeps going to my email.

hypothyroidism

From: fielddot@...

Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:38:15 +0000

Subject: Re: Hypothyroidism = Too Little Hormone Alternatives?

What's in a name?

hello maria

thanks for writing (and sorry for my slowness to reply).

>If anyone cared to look through the archives they'll find a long string of

" monologues " by two member's dispensing advice while boasting their " superior "

knowledge ad nauseam. (With an occasional acolyte giving praise and support).

They never positively discuss any alternative treatments or even the mere

possibility of the existence of one. And always collude to attack anyone that

dares brings an alternative into discussion.

yes, that's how it seems to me too....utterly tedious isn't it!

>How is it that these same few members have so much time to dedicate to this

group year after year?? I suspect them to be paid " professional pedantics "

planted to discredit anything that does not make money for the pharmaceuticals.

paid *spoilers* ....certainly a possibility....i too have thought " something is

rotten in the state of denmark "

http://www.quackpotwatch.org/WisconsinWar/who_are_these_so.htm

http://www.bolenreport.com/

best wishes

trish

>

> Trish:

>

> I see that now you are being battered for not agreeing with the self-appointed

" authorities " in this group.

>

> If anyone cared to look through the archives they'll find a long string of

" monologues " by two member's dispensing advice while boasting their " superior "

knowledge ad nauseam. (With an occasional acolyte giving praise and support).

They never positively discuss any alternative treatments or even the mere

possibility of the existence of one. And always collude to attack anyone that

dares brings an alternative into discussion.

>

> How is it that these same few members have so much time to dedicate to this

group year after year?? I suspect them to be paid " professional pedantics "

planted to discredit anything that does not make money for the pharmaceuticals.