The Science of Acupuncture and Qi Gong alive and well.

[Guest guest]

/Chuck.

Who cares if Einstein did not work a MIT and worked instead at Princeton... the

fact remains that MIT is a very well respected institution.

Chuck is this the best you can come up on the issue of MIT working with Gi Gong

energy and finding great scientific importance in it? , in the mean time

said Gi Gong had no place in a scientific discussion. Well so much for

great knowledge and Chuck’

s integrity.

With all due respect you are both simply splitting hairs. As always all you do

is find some inconsequential flaw to sidetrack and detract... your favorite

strategy to bully members of this group.

Today Acupuncture is supported by many well respected scientists in the medical

field. And neither one of you will not touch this point.

No matter what convoluted argument you spew out into this group the fact

remains that Acupuncture has been practiced for thousands of year with great

success. Call it scientific proof or not Chuck, there are tons of scientific

evidence that Acupuncture AND Qi Gong energy therapy do work. Look it up,

there is much written by many scientist with millions of case studies to back it

up, empirically so!.

You say nothing substantial of real interest, like a parrot you both repeat

protocols already established that can simply be looked up! Then you both pat

yourselves in the back.

You are stuck in your limited knowledge and all you can do is arrogantly

concentrate in correcting trivia in orther’s post in an effort to detract form

them and not have to discus the real issue at hand whenever you seem to lack

knowledge on or is something that goes against the best interests the

pharmaceuticals. Do you both work for the pharmaceuticals doing covert

propaganda online? Is Chuck and the same person?

You do help people on this group with doses, testing, all the things that

pharmaceuticals stand to make big money one... other than that what you have to

say about well respected alternative medicines is worthless, dishonest and not

to mention boring.

Let me enlighten you. You are the only ones who think you won these arguments.

And you are the only ones who care.

> > ... No doubt the Massachusetts Institute of Technology home to Einstein

finds this is something worth studying....

>

> MIT was not home to Einstein. He was at Princeton.

>

> Unless, of course, you mean Herb Einstein in the Dept. of Civil Engineering.

>

> Chuck

>