Guest guest Posted May 13, 2011 Report Share Posted May 13, 2011 > > Exactly! That is why to label protocols that have been around for thousands of years and are still working (not for everyone) as quackery, or inferior to allopathic medicine which is working (not for everyone) strikes me as short sighted. We are learning new things every day about medicine and the universe as well. Someday, the practice of medicine as it's done today will be laughed at and called barbaric. Unfortunately, we who are ill today with ailments that are not known, diagnosed and/or treated properly are the guinea pigs and will remain so. > > Oh yes, as far as meridians. They are known to exist in the world, and I do believe they have been also validated as existing in the body, but I'm not positive about that. Allopathic doctors, most of them, don't believe in alternative approaches, however the top spinal surgeons of University of Washington are totally unsatisfied with the tools they have for spinal/disc problems, and advise that alternative methods such as chiropractic, accupunture, physical therapy are just as efficacious, if not better than surgery. Where I live that instiution runs TV programs all the time about different things, what they are doing and what's available and what works. Some doctors won't even acknowledge that chiropractic is valid. > > Roni > > From: <res075oh@...> > hypothyroidism > Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 8:02 AM > Subject: Re: new numbers > > The apparent existence of and the search for dark energy and dark matter > are interesting to say the least. Now add in the findings of the most > distant galaxies that do not appear to have the constituents that we > might expect and a lot of what we think we know about cosmology comes > into question. Even the big bang itself might conceivably fall for a > newer theory; but I don't see how whatever replaces it could fail to > have some of the same characteristics. > > It's also possible [probable?] that if dark matter/dark energy are > confirmed as real and come to be understood that they may also challenge > [and change] our concept of physics on all levels. Chuck could probably > give you a darned good guess as to how probable any of my ramblings are; > I'm pretty much lost in trying to put it all together. I think Kaku > suggests that what we see of the Universe is only about 4% and the rest > is pretty much totally invisible to us. > > Regards, > > . > . > > > > Posted by: " Roni Molin " matchermaam@... > > <mailto:matchermaam@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20new%20numbers> > > matchermaam <matchermaam> > > > > > > Tue May 10, 2011 10:05 am (PDT) > > > > > > > > Scientific knowledge and understanding is changing every day. New > > discoveries produce new theories, new medical protocols, new cures and > > new understanding. I look forward to the new information that is > > discovered all the time. > > > > > > http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Searching_for_dark_matter_and_antimatter_999.h\ tml > > <http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Searching_for_dark_matter_and_antimatter_999.\ html> > > > > Roni > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.