Guest guest Posted July 16, 1999 Report Share Posted July 16, 1999 <!doctype html public " -//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en " > <html> Hi Tracey, <p>I'm switching this over to our jra list, since it pertinent here, too. Hope you don't mind..... <p>For whatever reasons, the doctors here have never talked about Josh's illness in terms of pauci or poly articular arthritis. They've always stuck with the systemic label. I have read that some kids who initially present with systemic symptoms later fall into the other categories due to changes in their symptomology. The fevers and rash and inflammation/involvement of organs, if I understand correctly, seem to diminish as time goes on for them, often being less severe during each subsequent flare up. And the child eventually just has regular arthritis symptoms, often lasting into adulthood. 15 or 20 % or so, from things I've read, continue to have ongoing systemic features. This is the category my son seems to fall under. Which is probably why he's still needing that darned prednisone! <p>Even after his treatment began, Josh had super high fevers almost daily for over a year. He still gets it often, despite all the heavy meds. I can't help but think that one day, his body will get tired of working overtime, have to adjust and go into a remission. His lowest SED rate ever was a 28, indicating that he still had inflammation going on, even when he felt his absolute best. The highest has been over 135! He has had recurring periods of medicated remissions but they never lasted too long. But one of these days...... & nbsp; :-) <p>Tracey Herzog wrote: <blockquote TYPE=CITE>Georgina, <br>Which type does Josh have? & nbsp; has polyarticular with system onset. <br>Tracey <p>Georgina wrote: <p>> Hi Lesley, <br>> <br>> Thanks :-) & nbsp; The inflammation you mention (uveitis?), isn't that very infrequent <br>> in children who have still's (systemic subset) and much more common in children <br>> who have the pauciarticular subset of JRA? <br>> <br>> ~Georgina <br>> <br>> lesley kay wrote: <br>> <br>> > The eye examination is for a different reason in childresn. In children <br>> > there's a risk of inflammation in the eye. It's dangerous because it has no <br>> > symptoms and the child could suddenly go blind, so slit lamp screening is <br>> > necessary to spot the early, very treatable signs. I don;t know why this <br>> > doesn;t happen in adults. <br>> > Lesley</blockquote> </html> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.