Guest guest Posted October 26, 2002 Report Share Posted October 26, 2002 http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992968 24 October 02 Spore detector 'could spot anthrax attack' A prototype device designed to prevent early warning of an anthrax attack has been developed by a NASA team. The device constantly sucks in air samples and will sound an alarm in response to a sudden increase in bacterial spores. " This allows constant unattended monitoring - just like a smoke detector, but for spores, " says Ponce at the Jet Propulsion Lab in Pasadena, California. A background level of spores are likely to be present in most locations, but sounding the alarm only if the level rises should prevent false alarms, he says: " You wouldn't expect to have a rapid increase in a spore count unless someone had deliberately released them. " The detectors could be installed in mail sorting offices or public buildings, Ponce says. Although the system could not pinpoint a particular letter contaminated with anthrax, it could provide a warning before the letter left the sorting depot. " The detection time would be fast enough to shut down a mail sorting machine and stop that letter being sent on to the White House, " he told New Scientist. Technicians would then be called in to use conventional methods to check for the presence of the anthrax bacterium. JPL has now agreed a partnership with Universal Detection Technology in Los Angeles to create a commercially available version of the anthrax detector, which could be on sale within about six months. The likely cost of the device is not yet known. Simulated attack Ponce and Lester at Baylor University, Texas, tested the device using harmless Bacillus subtilis spores. These spores were aerosolised, to simulate an anthrax attack. Spores captured in the air samples were suspended in a solution and 'popped' open with microwaves. The microwave bombardment released a chemical called dipicolinic acid, which is unique to bacterial spores, including anthrax. The dipicolinic acid immediately reacted with a chemical sensor in the solution, triggering a green luminescence, which corresponded to the concentration of spores in the sample. When changes in luminescence revealed a sudden increase in the spore count, an alarm sounded. The whole process takes about 15 minutes. But this would be fast enough to help prevent widespread contamination, the team argues. " Then you could provide treatment, and exposed people would be fine. Anthrax is most dangerous when you inhale it without realising and do not start treatment before symptoms appear, " Ponce says. Other teams are attempting to create automatic anthrax sensors based on replicating bacterial samples using the standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR). But this sensitive technique can be easily shut down if contaminated with pollutants, says Ponce. Emma Young Related Stories Bioweapon expert denies anthrax involvement 12 August 2002 http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992659 Anthrax attack bug " identical " to army strain 9 May 2002 http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992265 Cough syrup sales might reveal anthrax outbreak 15 April 2002 Weblinks JPL Universal Detection Technologies Anthrax, CDC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.