Re: IMPT. crosspost RE: MERCOLA's statement

[Guest guest]

Mr. Mercola - do you have any EMPIRICAL DATA

>From: Stinkypouf@...

>Reply-

>chemical-illnet@..., ,

> MCS-CI-Heal

>Subject: [] IMPT. crosspost RE: MERCOLA's statement

>Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 02:30:10 EST

>

>I suggest that anyone who hasn't yet read Dr. Mercola's latest MCS

>statement,

>that you do now.

> http://www.mercola.com/2002/nov/13/chemical_sensitivity.htm

>

>I am curious what folks think ... but I would also like to encourage people

>to make intelligent comments to Mercola, right away. His article/letter is

>carefully written and contains many good points, BUT he claims that " the

>primary cause of chemical sensitivity is often emotional trauma. "

>

>I appreciate this guy's site, but this article disturbs me because I feel

>that his SLANT only serves to provide ammunition to others who feel that

>therapy will " fix " the chemically sensitive, and I do NOT appreciate

>fueling

>the enemy.

>

>And he claims to have treated hundreds of MCS/EI's " successfully " ... but I

>have never heard from one of these people, from anywhere ...

>Has anyone else? He also doesn't substantiate much of anything he says. I

>mean, he claims EFT, some avoidance, and diet changes cure people. But

>we're

>just expected to believe it, I guess.

>

>Don't we ALL want what he says to be true? How many of us haven't been

>through tons of therapy and all that already? I want to get better ... In

>fact, with my healer, I am using the EFT technique he talks about.

>But is he also claiming that EFT is the ONLY emotional work that works?

>

>I have no problem whatsoever recognizing the role that emotions and spirit

>can and do play in illness.  But to say to anyone suffering from severe

>chemical poisoning and resultant physical problems that emotions are the

>PRIMARY cause, is simple nonsense.  (If I go blind from splashing bleach in

>my eye accidentally, is it emotional and therefore not permanent?)

>

>To me, this is the same as saying the PRIMARY cause of cancer is benzene.

> That's crap.  There is more than one carcinogen out there. There are a

>combination of factors in chemical sensitivity, as in most illnesses, and

>to

>claim that you know the MAIN cause isn't just wrong, it's also

>unadulterated

>arrogance.  

>

>(I personally think genetic damage from pollution BEFORE birth or

>conception

>is part of it, just as I believe that the human race cannot make major

>mistakes repeatedly, for eons, and get away with it karmically.  I think

>we're being affected by a lot of things.  But that's just me ...)

>

>I wouldn't feel it necessary to comment on this if he had even given

>chemicals and emotional wounds equal billing! To me, the fact that he does

>not is HIGHLY suspect.

>

>He says: <<  I was married to a Canadian physician who was disabled by

>severe

>chemical sensitivity. >>   

>

>Now, being that his position doesn't make sense, the only plausible

>explanation for it that I can come up with, is that he feels his EX-WIFE

>has

>a few emotional issues he feels SHE's not dealing with. This is far more

>likely than his emotional-cause-of-MCS claim being true, from what I can

>tell.

>

>But if this is the case, his bias could easily be solved ... if he simply

>practiced what he preached ... and did a little EFT on it. And we

>wouldn't have to suffer the damages of his easily-used-against-us argument.

>

>Mercola is generally credible (not with me right now, but anyway), and his

>position is important, so I believe he should be politely contacted ...

>that is, contacted again, considering that he wrote this piece in response

>to

>all the MCS feedback he received after the last statement.

>

>I encourage folks to CC the groups if they write Mercola.

>

>Thanks all,

>

>

>

>

_________________________________________________________________

MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.

http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

[Guest guest]

Mr. Mercola - do you have any EMPIRICAL DATA

>From: Stinkypouf@...

>Reply-

>chemical-illnet@..., ,

> MCS-CI-Heal

>Subject: [] IMPT. crosspost RE: MERCOLA's statement

>Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 02:30:10 EST

>

>I suggest that anyone who hasn't yet read Dr. Mercola's latest MCS

>statement,

>that you do now.

> http://www.mercola.com/2002/nov/13/chemical_sensitivity.htm

>

>I am curious what folks think ... but I would also like to encourage people

>to make intelligent comments to Mercola, right away. His article/letter is

>carefully written and contains many good points, BUT he claims that " the

>primary cause of chemical sensitivity is often emotional trauma. "

>

>I appreciate this guy's site, but this article disturbs me because I feel

>that his SLANT only serves to provide ammunition to others who feel that

>therapy will " fix " the chemically sensitive, and I do NOT appreciate

>fueling

>the enemy.

>

>And he claims to have treated hundreds of MCS/EI's " successfully " ... but I

>have never heard from one of these people, from anywhere ...

>Has anyone else? He also doesn't substantiate much of anything he says. I

>mean, he claims EFT, some avoidance, and diet changes cure people. But

>we're

>just expected to believe it, I guess.

>

>Don't we ALL want what he says to be true? How many of us haven't been

>through tons of therapy and all that already? I want to get better ... In

>fact, with my healer, I am using the EFT technique he talks about.

>But is he also claiming that EFT is the ONLY emotional work that works?

>

>I have no problem whatsoever recognizing the role that emotions and spirit

>can and do play in illness.  But to say to anyone suffering from severe

>chemical poisoning and resultant physical problems that emotions are the

>PRIMARY cause, is simple nonsense.  (If I go blind from splashing bleach in

>my eye accidentally, is it emotional and therefore not permanent?)

>

>To me, this is the same as saying the PRIMARY cause of cancer is benzene.

> That's crap.  There is more than one carcinogen out there. There are a

>combination of factors in chemical sensitivity, as in most illnesses, and

>to

>claim that you know the MAIN cause isn't just wrong, it's also

>unadulterated

>arrogance.  

>

>(I personally think genetic damage from pollution BEFORE birth or

>conception

>is part of it, just as I believe that the human race cannot make major

>mistakes repeatedly, for eons, and get away with it karmically.  I think

>we're being affected by a lot of things.  But that's just me ...)

>

>I wouldn't feel it necessary to comment on this if he had even given

>chemicals and emotional wounds equal billing! To me, the fact that he does

>not is HIGHLY suspect.

>

>He says: <<  I was married to a Canadian physician who was disabled by

>severe

>chemical sensitivity. >>   

>

>Now, being that his position doesn't make sense, the only plausible

>explanation for it that I can come up with, is that he feels his EX-WIFE

>has

>a few emotional issues he feels SHE's not dealing with. This is far more

>likely than his emotional-cause-of-MCS claim being true, from what I can

>tell.

>

>But if this is the case, his bias could easily be solved ... if he simply

>practiced what he preached ... and did a little EFT on it. And we

>wouldn't have to suffer the damages of his easily-used-against-us argument.

>

>Mercola is generally credible (not with me right now, but anyway), and his

>position is important, so I believe he should be politely contacted ...

>that is, contacted again, considering that he wrote this piece in response

>to

>all the MCS feedback he received after the last statement.

>

>I encourage folks to CC the groups if they write Mercola.

>

>Thanks all,

>

>

>

>

_________________________________________________________________

The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*

http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

[Guest guest]

Mr. Mercola - do you have any EMPIRICAL DATA

>From: Stinkypouf@...

>Reply-

>chemical-illnet@..., ,

> MCS-CI-Heal

>Subject: [] IMPT. crosspost RE: MERCOLA's statement

>Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 02:30:10 EST

>

>I suggest that anyone who hasn't yet read Dr. Mercola's latest MCS

>statement,

>that you do now.

> http://www.mercola.com/2002/nov/13/chemical_sensitivity.htm

>

>I am curious what folks think ... but I would also like to encourage people

>to make intelligent comments to Mercola, right away. His article/letter is

>carefully written and contains many good points, BUT he claims that " the

>primary cause of chemical sensitivity is often emotional trauma. "

>

>I appreciate this guy's site, but this article disturbs me because I feel

>that his SLANT only serves to provide ammunition to others who feel that

>therapy will " fix " the chemically sensitive, and I do NOT appreciate

>fueling

>the enemy.

>

>And he claims to have treated hundreds of MCS/EI's " successfully " ... but I

>have never heard from one of these people, from anywhere ...

>Has anyone else? He also doesn't substantiate much of anything he says. I

>mean, he claims EFT, some avoidance, and diet changes cure people. But

>we're

>just expected to believe it, I guess.

>

>Don't we ALL want what he says to be true? How many of us haven't been

>through tons of therapy and all that already? I want to get better ... In

>fact, with my healer, I am using the EFT technique he talks about.

>But is he also claiming that EFT is the ONLY emotional work that works?

>

>I have no problem whatsoever recognizing the role that emotions and spirit

>can and do play in illness.  But to say to anyone suffering from severe

>chemical poisoning and resultant physical problems that emotions are the

>PRIMARY cause, is simple nonsense.  (If I go blind from splashing bleach in

>my eye accidentally, is it emotional and therefore not permanent?)

>

>To me, this is the same as saying the PRIMARY cause of cancer is benzene.

> That's crap.  There is more than one carcinogen out there. There are a

>combination of factors in chemical sensitivity, as in most illnesses, and

>to

>claim that you know the MAIN cause isn't just wrong, it's also

>unadulterated

>arrogance.  

>

>(I personally think genetic damage from pollution BEFORE birth or

>conception

>is part of it, just as I believe that the human race cannot make major

>mistakes repeatedly, for eons, and get away with it karmically.  I think

>we're being affected by a lot of things.  But that's just me ...)

>

>I wouldn't feel it necessary to comment on this if he had even given

>chemicals and emotional wounds equal billing! To me, the fact that he does

>not is HIGHLY suspect.

>

>He says: <<  I was married to a Canadian physician who was disabled by

>severe

>chemical sensitivity. >>   

>

>Now, being that his position doesn't make sense, the only plausible

>explanation for it that I can come up with, is that he feels his EX-WIFE

>has

>a few emotional issues he feels SHE's not dealing with. This is far more

>likely than his emotional-cause-of-MCS claim being true, from what I can

>tell.

>

>But if this is the case, his bias could easily be solved ... if he simply

>practiced what he preached ... and did a little EFT on it. And we

>wouldn't have to suffer the damages of his easily-used-against-us argument.

>

>Mercola is generally credible (not with me right now, but anyway), and his

>position is important, so I believe he should be politely contacted ...

>that is, contacted again, considering that he wrote this piece in response

>to

>all the MCS feedback he received after the last statement.

>

>I encourage folks to CC the groups if they write Mercola.

>

>Thanks all,

>

>

>

>

_________________________________________________________________

Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*

http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

[Guest guest]

Mr. Mercola - do you have any EMPIRICAL DATA

>From: Stinkypouf@...

>Reply-

>chemical-illnet@..., ,

> MCS-CI-Heal

>Subject: [] IMPT. crosspost RE: MERCOLA's statement

>Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 02:30:10 EST

>

>I suggest that anyone who hasn't yet read Dr. Mercola's latest MCS

>statement,

>that you do now.

> http://www.mercola.com/2002/nov/13/chemical_sensitivity.htm

>

>I am curious what folks think ... but I would also like to encourage people

>to make intelligent comments to Mercola, right away. His article/letter is

>carefully written and contains many good points, BUT he claims that " the

>primary cause of chemical sensitivity is often emotional trauma. "

>

>I appreciate this guy's site, but this article disturbs me because I feel

>that his SLANT only serves to provide ammunition to others who feel that

>therapy will " fix " the chemically sensitive, and I do NOT appreciate

>fueling

>the enemy.

>

>And he claims to have treated hundreds of MCS/EI's " successfully " ... but I

>have never heard from one of these people, from anywhere ...

>Has anyone else? He also doesn't substantiate much of anything he says. I

>mean, he claims EFT, some avoidance, and diet changes cure people. But

>we're

>just expected to believe it, I guess.

>

>Don't we ALL want what he says to be true? How many of us haven't been

>through tons of therapy and all that already? I want to get better ... In

>fact, with my healer, I am using the EFT technique he talks about.

>But is he also claiming that EFT is the ONLY emotional work that works?

>

>I have no problem whatsoever recognizing the role that emotions and spirit

>can and do play in illness.  But to say to anyone suffering from severe

>chemical poisoning and resultant physical problems that emotions are the

>PRIMARY cause, is simple nonsense.  (If I go blind from splashing bleach in

>my eye accidentally, is it emotional and therefore not permanent?)

>

>To me, this is the same as saying the PRIMARY cause of cancer is benzene.

> That's crap.  There is more than one carcinogen out there. There are a

>combination of factors in chemical sensitivity, as in most illnesses, and

>to

>claim that you know the MAIN cause isn't just wrong, it's also

>unadulterated

>arrogance.  

>

>(I personally think genetic damage from pollution BEFORE birth or

>conception

>is part of it, just as I believe that the human race cannot make major

>mistakes repeatedly, for eons, and get away with it karmically.  I think

>we're being affected by a lot of things.  But that's just me ...)

>

>I wouldn't feel it necessary to comment on this if he had even given

>chemicals and emotional wounds equal billing! To me, the fact that he does

>not is HIGHLY suspect.

>

>He says: <<  I was married to a Canadian physician who was disabled by

>severe

>chemical sensitivity. >>   

>

>Now, being that his position doesn't make sense, the only plausible

>explanation for it that I can come up with, is that he feels his EX-WIFE

>has

>a few emotional issues he feels SHE's not dealing with. This is far more

>likely than his emotional-cause-of-MCS claim being true, from what I can

>tell.

>

>But if this is the case, his bias could easily be solved ... if he simply

>practiced what he preached ... and did a little EFT on it. And we

>wouldn't have to suffer the damages of his easily-used-against-us argument.

>

>Mercola is generally credible (not with me right now, but anyway), and his

>position is important, so I believe he should be politely contacted ...

>that is, contacted again, considering that he wrote this piece in response

>to

>all the MCS feedback he received after the last statement.

>

>I encourage folks to CC the groups if they write Mercola.

>

>Thanks all,

>

>

>

>

_________________________________________________________________

Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*

http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

[Guest guest]

Mr. Mercola - do you have any EMPIRICAL DATA - that is the comment we get

when we visit other Doctors!!!!!

>From: Stinkypouf@...

>Reply-

>chemical-illnet@..., ,

> MCS-CI-Heal

>Subject: [] IMPT. crosspost RE: MERCOLA's statement

>Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 02:30:10 EST

>

>I suggest that anyone who hasn't yet read Dr. Mercola's latest MCS

>statement,

>that you do now.

> http://www.mercola.com/2002/nov/13/chemical_sensitivity.htm

>

>I am curious what folks think ... but I would also like to encourage people

>to make intelligent comments to Mercola, right away. His article/letter is

>carefully written and contains many good points, BUT he claims that " the

>primary cause of chemical sensitivity is often emotional trauma. "

>

>I appreciate this guy's site, but this article disturbs me because I feel

>that his SLANT only serves to provide ammunition to others who feel that

>therapy will " fix " the chemically sensitive, and I do NOT appreciate

>fueling

>the enemy.

>

>And he claims to have treated hundreds of MCS/EI's " successfully " ... but I

>have never heard from one of these people, from anywhere ...

>Has anyone else? He also doesn't substantiate much of anything he says. I

>mean, he claims EFT, some avoidance, and diet changes cure people. But

>we're

>just expected to believe it, I guess.

>

>Don't we ALL want what he says to be true? How many of us haven't been

>through tons of therapy and all that already? I want to get better ... In

>fact, with my healer, I am using the EFT technique he talks about.

>But is he also claiming that EFT is the ONLY emotional work that works?

>

>I have no problem whatsoever recognizing the role that emotions and spirit

>can and do play in illness.  But to say to anyone suffering from severe

>chemical poisoning and resultant physical problems that emotions are the

>PRIMARY cause, is simple nonsense.  (If I go blind from splashing bleach in

>my eye accidentally, is it emotional and therefore not permanent?)

>

>To me, this is the same as saying the PRIMARY cause of cancer is benzene.

> That's crap.  There is more than one carcinogen out there. There are a

>combination of factors in chemical sensitivity, as in most illnesses, and

>to

>claim that you know the MAIN cause isn't just wrong, it's also

>unadulterated

>arrogance.  

>

>(I personally think genetic damage from pollution BEFORE birth or

>conception

>is part of it, just as I believe that the human race cannot make major

>mistakes repeatedly, for eons, and get away with it karmically.  I think

>we're being affected by a lot of things.  But that's just me ...)

>

>I wouldn't feel it necessary to comment on this if he had even given

>chemicals and emotional wounds equal billing! To me, the fact that he does

>not is HIGHLY suspect.

>

>He says: <<  I was married to a Canadian physician who was disabled by

>severe

>chemical sensitivity. >>   

>

>Now, being that his position doesn't make sense, the only plausible

>explanation for it that I can come up with, is that he feels his EX-WIFE

>has

>a few emotional issues he feels SHE's not dealing with. This is far more

>likely than his emotional-cause-of-MCS claim being true, from what I can

>tell.

>

>But if this is the case, his bias could easily be solved ... if he simply

>practiced what he preached ... and did a little EFT on it. And we

>wouldn't have to suffer the damages of his easily-used-against-us argument.

>

>Mercola is generally credible (not with me right now, but anyway), and his

>position is important, so I believe he should be politely contacted ...

>that is, contacted again, considering that he wrote this piece in response

>to

>all the MCS feedback he received after the last statement.

>

>I encourage folks to CC the groups if they write Mercola.

>

>Thanks all,

>

>

>

>

_________________________________________________________________

Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.

http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail