Guest guest Posted November 17, 2002 Report Share Posted November 17, 2002 formaldehyde in sick buildings and from aspartame: Thrasher: Murray: 11.17.2 rmforall aspartameNM/message/867 http://www.drthrasher.org/formaldehyde_1990.html Arch Environ Health 1990 Jul-Aug;45(4):217-23 Immune activation and autoantibodies in humans with long-term inhalation exposure to formaldehyde. Thrasher JD, Broughton A, Madison R. Thrasher & Associates, Northridge, California. Jack D. Thrasher, PhD, studied several groups of patients from sick buildings, finding immune system symptoms that are similar to the problems that aspartame reactors report [NutraSweet, Equal]. The common factor is chronic long-term, low-level formaldehyde exposure. Many scientists agree that it is possible to use a lot of aspartame daily, particularly from diet soda, and that its methanol component, exactly 11% by weight, is quickly released in the GI tract, metabolized into the about same weight of formaldehyde, then subsequently and quickly into formic acid, and thence to carbon dioxide and water. J. Nutrition 1973 Oct; 103(10): 1454-1459. Metabolism of aspartame in monkeys. Oppermann JA, Muldoon E, Ranney RE. Dept. of Biochemistry, Searle Laboratories, Division of G.D. Searle and Co. Box 5110, Chicago, IL 60680 They found that about 70% of the radioactive methanol in aspartame put into the stomachs of 3 to 7 kg monkeys was eliminated within a day as carbon dioxide in exhaled air and as water in the urine. They did not mention that this meant that about 30% of the methanol must transform into formaldehyde and then into formic acid, much of which must remain as toxic products in all parts of the body. They did not report any studies on the distribution of radioactivity in body tissues, except that blood plasma proteins after 4 days held 4% of the initial methanol. This study did not monitor long-term use of aspartame. The question is: how much of this formaldehyde and formic acid, both deadly, potent, cumulative toxins with complex multiple effects, as much as 7 mg total from the 200 mg aspartame in a 12-oz can of diet soda, result in various toxic processes in people? Bear in mind that the EPA limit [see below] for formaldehyde in drinking water is 1 ppm, or 2 mg daily for a typical daily consumption of 2 L of water. aspartameNM/message/835 RTM: ATSDR: EPA limit 1 ppm formaldehyde in drinking water July 1999 5.30.2 rmforall Thrasher's report about symptoms from long-term, low-level exposure to formaldehyde gives much the same litany of complex symptoms as aspartame reactors, who often report using 2-4 L daily of diet soda, providing 112-224 mg methanol, resulting in chronic formaldehyde and formic acid toxicity. The most common symptoms are, in rough order of occurence: * headaches * many body and joint pains (or burning, tingling, tremors, twitching, spasms, cramps, or numbness) * fever, fatigue * " mind fog " , " feel unreal " , poor memory, confusion, anxiety, irritability, depression, mania, insomnia, dizziness, slurred speech, ringing in ears, sexual problems, poor vision, hearing, or taste * red face, itching, rashes, burning eyes or throat, dry mouth or eyes, mouth sores * hair loss * obesity, bloating, edema, anorexia, poor or excessive hunger or thirst * breathing problems * nausea, diarrhea or constipation * coldness * sweating * racing heart, high blood pressure, erratic blood sugar levels * seizures * birth defects * brain cancers * addiction * aggrivates diabetes, autism, ADHD, allergies, and interstitial cystitis (bladder pain). [Extracts} Inhalation exposure to formaldehyde (HCHO) is associated with symptoms of irritation to mucous membranes, (1,2) chronic health problems (e.g., asthma, (2) nasopharyngeal cancer, (3) and multiple subjective health complaints. (4,5) ) Recent observations have shown that both humoral-and cell-mediated immunologic mechanisms occur in humans with long-term HCHO exposure. Antibodies of all isotypes to HCHO conjugated human serum albumin (HCHO-HSA) are demonstrable in HCHO anaphylaxis, (6) hemodialysis patients, (7) mobile home residents, (4) persons with occupational exposures, (5,8) office workers, (9) and in persons in other environments. (4) In addition, changes in cell-mediated immunity include increases in eosinophils, basophils, and T-suppressor cells following acute exposure of patients with HCHO asthma. (10) Moreover, individuals with multiple subjective health complaints associated with long-term HCHO inhalation have evidence of immune activation and the presence of autoantibodies. (4,5) The patients in our study had symptoms and complaints related to several organs, as described previously, (4,5,9) which were similar to symptoms of workers with multiple chemical sensitivity,(11) cacosmia,(12) and other chemical exposures. (13-15) We report on the differences in humoral and cell-mediated immunity in humans with long-term inhalation exposure to HCHO vs. asymptomatic students (controls) who experienced short-term, periodic exposure to the chemical. [ http://lassesen.com/cfids/cacosmia.htm Cacosmia (a.k.a. Multiple Chemical Sensitivity) Details: * Chemical odour intolerance induced headache, itching eyes, irritated or congested nose, dry and/or sore throat, cough, dizziness, and itching or rash. * Cacosmics reported increased prevalence of physician-diagnosed nasal allergies, breast cysts, hypothyroidism, sinusitis, food sensitivities, irritable bowel, and migraine headache. Resource: http://www.mcsrr.org ] Five groups of subjects exposed to HCHO, who gave informed consent, were included in this study. (1) Controls consisted of students of chiropractic medicine (16 males, 12 females), mean age = 29 +- 9 y) exposed to HCHO for 13 h/wk for 28 wk while studying human anatomy. Immunologic tests were performed 12 mo following the last classroom exposure. No measurements of HCHO concentrations were made. It is assumed that classroom ambient concentrations were at least 0.43 ppm. [1.] The students stated that during exposure they experienced eye, nose and throat irritation and that there was a pungent odor of HCHO. They did not have residual health complaints (symptoms), and they were asymptomatic at the time blood was taken. [2.] Mobile home residents consisted of 19 patients (6 males, 13 females), mean age 41 +-20 y) who currently lived in mobile homes. The patients had lived in their environments for 2-7 y and reported multiple symptoms. (4,9) Measured HCHO concentrations ranged from 0.05 to 0.5 ppm at the time blood samples were taken. [3.] Office workers included 21 patients (5 males, 16 females, mean age of 40 +-10 y) who worked in new office buildings where there was inadequate ventilation (closed buildings). The patients had multiple health complaints. (9) It was determined from medical histories that their symptoms commenced with employment, waned when away from work (i.e., weekends, holidays, vacations) and became worse upon return to work. No HCO measurements were done; however, closed buildings have ambient concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 0.77 ppm. (1,16) [4.] This group included 21 patients (10 males, 11 females, mean age of 35 + -17 y) who had multiple symptoms and who had been removed from their original sources of HCHO exposure (mobile homes and/or particleboard subflooring) for at least 1 y. The HCHO concentrations measured during their exposures ranged from 0.14 to 0.81 ppm. [5.] Occupationally exposed patients (6 males, 2 females, mean age of 45 + -11 y) had HCHO exposures from the following: biology and human anatomy classes, mortuary, pathology, physical therapy, formica furniture (particleboard), and carbonless copy paper. Information on six of these patients was previously published. (5) Symptoms. All patients in this study had sought continuous medical attention because of multiple organ symptoms involving the central nervous system (CNS) (headaches, memory loss, difficulty completing tasks, dizziness), upper- and lower-respiratory symptoms, skeletal-muscle complaints, and gastroenteritis. Three common symptoms were expressed: [1.] and initial flu-like illness from which they had not fully recovered; [2.] chronic fatigue; and [3.] an olfactory sensitivity to ambient conditions containing low concentrations of chemicals. (4,9,11).... Higher anti-HCHO-HSA isotypes (i.e, 1:16 or greater) are present in the patients v. controls. One explanation for this difference is simply the lag time between the last exposure v. the time of antibody detection. However, the higher titers of IgE and IgM isotypes in the patients suggests that a more recent exposure has occurred, particularly if the higher IgG titers are considered also. In this vein, the patients complain of a sensitivity (both olfactory and respiratory) to environments containing low concentrations of HCHO and other chemicals. Thus, the higher titers may indicate that their immune systems are on constant alert, undergoing continuous activation upon encountering and recognizing environmental haptens. (4-6,8,9) It would be of interest to examine for other haptens to which the patients may be responding. (9) [Aspartame is a good example.] The higher antibody titers and the larger proportion of individuals with anti-HCHO isotypes in the removed patients v. controls merit comment. Both groups were at least 1 y removed from their original source of exposure. However, the controls were asymptomatic, whereas the patients experienced ongoing health problems associated with environmental exposures, e.g. new carpets, fresh paints, new furnishings, diesel exhaust, and perfumes. Thus, it appears that long-term low-level exposure to HCHO, and possibly other haptens, lead to immunological recognition and immune activation in sensitized individuals. Apparently, shorter periodic exposure to HCHO may lead to recognition but not necessarily immune activation. Moreover, chronic low-level exposures to HCHO appear to effect a sensitivity to environmental chemicals.(4-6, 8,9) Perhaps the anti-HCHO-HSA isotypes in these patients is but one aspect of a multiple immunologic response to environmental exposures as observed in building-related illness. (9) It is recognized that chemicals and therapeutic drugs are associated with a Lupus-like syndrome. (28,29 ) The observations made on the patients in this study support this concept. The percentage of specific autoantibodies (e.g., ASS, APC, ANA, etc.) are consistently higher in the patients vs. controls (Table 4). Moreover, the odds ratios for the presence of at least 1, 2 or 3 autoantibodies are greater in the residents of mobile homes and office workers (p <.05) relative to controls (Table 5). Presently, autoimmune disorders have not been diagnosed clinically in these patients. However, current investigations in progress appear to correlate the presence of APC autoantibodies with gastritis complaints and antimyelin autantibodies with CNS and PNS symptoms. In conclusion, measurements of changes in WBCs, T cells, and H/S ratios in individuals with apparent chemical sensitivities appear to be inadequate immune parameters to examine. If one assumes that these individuals respond immunogically to environmental chemicals, investigations into autoimmunity and immune activation and perturbations in the interleukins, luekotreines, prostglandins, and other immunologic mediators appear to be fruitful areas for further research. (29-32) Thus, it appears that HCHO sensitivity is a real phenomenon and requires further research. (4,27-32 ) [End of report] http://www.drthrasher.org/formaldehyde_embryo_toxicity.html Arch Environ Health 2001 Jul-Aug; 56(4): 300-11 Embryo toxicity and teratogenicity of formaldehyde. Thrasher JD, Kilburn KH. http://www.aal.xohost.com/allabout.htm Alan Broughton, MD, PhD inquire@... AAL Reference Laboratories, Inc.[formerly Antibody Assay Laboratories] 1715 E. Wilshire #715 Santa Ana, Ca 92705 (714)972-9979 Fax: (714)543-2034 (800)522-2611(US and Canada) - Physicians Only Please a Madison, D.P.H. roberta.madison@... Dept. Health Science, California State University Northridge, California (818)-677-2969 fax (818) 677-3977 ********************************************************** Rich Murray, MA Room For All rmforall@... 1943 Otowi Road, Santa Fe NM 87505 USA 505-986-9103 aspartameNM/messages for 889 posts in a public searchable archive aspartameNM/message/861 brief review aspartameNM/message/862 long review aspartameNM/message/860 RTM: FDA: objections to neotame approval 8.3.2 rmforall 38 pages *********************************************************************** Subject: [] Re: " maybe " she has MS Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 07:20:07 -0500 From: pmaurer134320MI@... Reply- Don't wait for a doctor to figure it out. No doctor is going to come out and look at your house. Take the bull by the horns. Better yet, give the doctor the book " Help, My House is Killing Me " by Mr. May. My allergies gave me symptoms like MS (especially new carpeting). I went to lots of good doctors, but it took my own research to put it all together. Perhaps the town or county building inspectors could help. Obviously they need to get out of that building. At a minimum perhaps the landlord has another apartment that is dry. I always choose an apartment on a higher floor. Ground floor apartments are frequently damp. Once the mold spores are there they will never go away, and the mold will grow again once the conditions are right. If the building is so damp that mushrooms sprouted, i wouldn't hold out much hope it will be repaired properly. It is possible they are now sensitized to mold and therefore an anti-yeast diet might help them. That involves avoiding distilled products like vinegar (pickles, catsup, mustard), alcohol, as well as avoiding concentrated sources of sugar. Fruit juice should be diluted with water. Also yeasty things like bread, beer. You can look this up in books by Crook or Null. Maurer, Michigan *********************************************************************** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.