Guest guest Posted November 3, 2008 Report Share Posted November 3, 2008 Ok. Friday I left work very distraught. I was informed of the preliminary findings of this study. I thought this study was dead and gone. It was my understanding that Murry Golstien and all involved never got it off the ground. e Creacy asured me that she ahd withdrawn all support from this study. However it has been brought to my attention that indeed the study did go forth and she was informed and was updated periodically on the outcome and how the study was progressing. It is my undestanding that this study was set up for falure to begin with. They one did a block of 20 treatments from my understanding that is not enough to get to the benifical stage to substain the improvments. It has allway's been said that 40 is the initial to substain the benifits. Also the pressure they used was not the standard. Also if I'm not mistaking they used Pet scan's instead of Spec Scan's. I'm asking e to step forth and either DENY her involvement or to release the information she has regarding this study. I can not find out where to get a copy of the results from my understanding they may not be released just yet only preliminary findings. If I'm wrong I will say so. However I do know that she was involved with Murry Goldstein on this study and to my knowledge she was to have supposidly pulled her support. But the information I got Friday is that she has not pulled her support and was updated from time to time. More information comming.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 10, 2008 Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 If all the energy spent on trying to put e and others in a bad light was spent on research and getting the word out about HBOT - what strides could be made. > > Ok. Friday I left work very distraught. I was informed of the preliminary findings of this study. I thought this study was dead and gone. It was my understanding that Murry Golstien and all involved never got it off the ground. e Creacy asured me that she ahd withdrawn all support from this study. > > However it has been brought to my attention that indeed the study did go forth and she was informed and was updated periodically on the outcome and how the study was progressing. > > It is my undestanding that this study was set up for falure to begin with. They one did a block of 20 treatments from my understanding that is not enough to get to the benifical stage to substain the improvments. It has allway's been said that 40 is the initial to substain the benifits. > > Also the pressure they used was not the standard. Also if I'm not mistaking they used Pet scan's instead of Spec Scan's. > > I'm asking e to step forth and either DENY her involvement or to release the information she has regarding this study. I can not find out where to get a copy of the results from my understanding they may not be released just yet only preliminary findings. > > > If I'm wrong I will say so. However I do know that she was involved with Murry Goldstein on this study and to my knowledge she was to have supposidly pulled her support. But the information I got Friday is that she has not pulled her support and was updated from time to time. > > > More information comming.... > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 10, 2008 Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 Look Scarlet is it. Nobody is trying to put them in bad light. Just the deed's that are being done. I truly in all relality like e. You would no knwo that. But yes we were good freinds at one point. But she fails to see where the UHMS and things like this blotched UCLA study can cause harm to the feild. Spend some time on here reading From: Scarlet Hart <eyesthatsparkle2002@...> Subject: [ ] Re: UCLA Study... medicaid Date: Monday, November 10, 2008, 2:41 PM If all the energy spent on trying to put e and others in a bad light was spent on research and getting the word out about HBOT - what strides could be made. > > Ok. Friday I left work very distraught. I was informed of the preliminary findings of this study. I thought this study was dead and gone. It was my understanding that Murry Golstien and all involved never got it off the ground. e Creacy asured me that she ahd withdrawn all support from this study. > > However it has been brought to my attention that indeed the study did go forth and she was informed and was updated periodically on the outcome and how the study was progressing. > > It is my undestanding that this study was set up for falure to begin with. They one did a block of 20 treatments from my understanding that is not enough to get to the benifical stage to substain the improvments. It has allway's been said that 40 is the initial to substain the benifits. > > Also the pressure they used was not the standard. Also if I'm not mistaking they used Pet scan's instead of Spec Scan's. > > I'm asking e to step forth and either DENY her involvement or to release the information she has regarding this study. I can not find out where to get a copy of the results from my understanding they may not be released just yet only preliminary findings. > > > If I'm wrong I will say so. However I do know that she was involved with Murry Goldstein on this study and to my knowledge she was to have supposidly pulled her support. But the information I got Friday is that she has not pulled her support and was updated from time to time. > > > More information comming.... > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.