Why e Creacy, Tom Fox, and AAHA are bad for Hyperbarics.

[Guest guest]

Re: [ ] In response to e's resignation

to AHHA

>

>I am a very big supporter of soft chambers. With that being said, I

believe that what she means is that she is done arguing. That is what

we should all do. However, that would require the hard chamber folks

to admit that the soft chambers are safe and beneficial. It is time

for a truce so that the industry can move forward.

>

It is no longer as easy as forgive and forget.

AAHA is about to torpedo the entire off-label HBOT movement. Their

going to create awareness alright. Massive awareness of failure.

Darin has accurately pinpointed the inherent and perpetual

conflict of interest for AAHA. Founder and President e Creacy

treats her husband in a portable chamber. She has stated multiple

times that this chamber has " saved Bill's life. "

AAHA officer Weible daily treats patients in portable

hyperbaric chambers.

AAHA officer Tom Fox has publicly stated portable chambers are

dangerous because they are not approved by ASME-PVHO. This is a

nonsensical circumstance.

Mr. Fox's own children were treated in the UK in 1998 in non ASME-

PVHO, non FDA-approved chambers; however, according to his position

today, his wife's decision to treat their children in those chambers

created a life-threatening for their children.

Mr. Fox routinely fails to acknowledge that over 2,100,000 treatments

have been safely administered without incident in these non ASME-PVHO,

non FDA approved chambers.

To make matters worse, Mr. Fox has himself personally altered multiple

portable chambers, personally making them dangerous and absolutely in

violation of not only ASME-PVHO but also FDA.

At the HBOT 2008 symposium, the owner of the altered chamber was in

attendance and planned to publicly confront Mr. Fox; however, Mr. Fox

and Mrs. Creacy took advantage of private issues they knew about the

owner's personal life and threatened to share this embarrassing

information if Mr. Fox were confronted. Subsequently, the

confrontation did not take place--at the symposium.

Now, this sort of thing is usually called extortion. Or blackmail.

It's not the sort of thing practiced by people who are professionals--

except for professional criminals.

Also during the symposium, Mr. Fox gave a presentation on treating

Iraq vets with blast injuries with HBOT. He described the injury as

bubbles forced into the system, i.e., like decompression sickness or

an air embolism. He claimed to have found an obscure reference in the

military medical literature that the US Army declared HBOT as the

standard of care treatment for blast injury. He stated it was from

1990 or 1991; however, he refused to provide the actual reference.

Because of his past history of untruth and extortion, the data he

presented at the symposium was initially doubted.

It has since been learned there is a program to be announced by the US

Army from San , Texas in a few short weeks wherein they will be

treating blast-injured vets with HBOT, and apparently the Texas

housewife who extorts her way in and out of circumstances is all set

to put AAHA on the map by participating and/or leading the US Army's

venture with HBOT.

However, it appears this participation is contingent upon the AAHA's

agreement with and acceptance of a treatment protocol designed by the

most recognized authority in Hyperbaric Medicine, the Undersea and

Hyperbaric Medical Society (UHMS).

Now, the UHMS protocol for air embolism and decompression sickness

calls for anywhere from 2 ATA all the way up to 2.4 ATA. That's high

pressure, about as high a pressure protocol as there is in Hyperbaric

Medicine. Of course, that means Mrs. Creacy, the AAHA President,

certainly can't come out and publicly state endorsement of the

therapeutic benefits of 1.3 ATA AIR that's saved her husband's life

and thousands upon thousands of others. It might jeopardize her San

opportunity.

It has been well established by Rockswold and Harch and

Neubauer and other nonextortionists and non-liars that the optimum

protocol for treating brain-injury is 1.5 ATA. In fact, the UHMS has

declared brain-injury cannot be improved upon or benefitted from HBOT--

yet the Texas housewife and the Canadian madman have hooked up with

and are whoring with the pirates at the UHMS--so as to get their names

in the papers and their pictures on the cover of Time magazine by

agreeing to the greater than 2 ATA protocol.

As for the soldiers, when subjected to the greater than 2 ATA

protocol, seizures will be induced, deaths are likely to occur, and

improvements will be minimal to marginal to none and it will be

eventually declared not worth the risk of seizures and death, and so

HBOT for PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), i.e., brain-injury

will be declared a failure.

It is the confirmation of failure in treating brain-injury with HBOT

that the UHMS seeks, and the president and vice president in charge of

vice of the American Association of Hyperbaric Awareness are going to

make the whole country aware and the entire medical community aware of

the fact that brain-injury called PTSD cannot be improved by HBOT.

That will be the only by-product of this AAHA stunt. A failure. This

will directly impact you and me and us all and the quality of life of

our brain-injured loved ones. You can kiss HBOT goodbye as this will

set HBOT back by 10 years if not forever.

But what else do you think liars, cheats, thieves, and extortionists

would produce.

Freels

2948 Windfield Circle

Tucker, GA 30084-6714

770-491-6776 (phone)

404-725-4520 (cell)

815-366-7962 (fax)

mailto:david@...

fearlessparents/

http://www. .com

http://www.davidfreels.com