Guest guest Posted November 16, 2008 Report Share Posted November 16, 2008 The following was posted on Hartsoe's list today. He must have missed it, as he usually does not allow posts that contradict what he has stated. Please read all, as the first part is a letter written to Dr. Marois, the second is his reply. Dear Dr Marois, I was reading posts on the neuro HBOT group and I came across this posting and I wasn't sure if the statements that were made in this post were completely accurate with regards to your study. Is the portion that states that the 1.5 group showed more improvement than the 1.3 true? Also, the portion that reads that both the 1.3 andthe 1.5 groups were tested months after the study was completed andthe 1.3 group regressed? I always like accurate information when it comes to these things because when I speak to parents about HBOT I want to ensure that the information that I am giving them is true to the best of my knowledge. Thank you so much for your help in this matter. Kind regards, ita From: Pierre Marois ita Sent: Nov 8, 2008 10:03 AM Subject: Re:Hi ita, it is false that the 1.5 group showed more improvement than the 1.3 .The improvements were exactly the same in both groups...it was impressive in both groups. It is also false that the 1.3 group regressed. Both groups continued to progress normally. Do not hesitate to ask for my help. Here, attached, is an article I have published a year ago. It is a summary of the actual knowledge on HBOT and CP. Pierre Marois Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.