Guest guest Posted January 25, 2000 Report Share Posted January 25, 2000 Aside from the fact that one is purposely killing an important God-given organ, can anyone list some specifics about why one should not go the RAI route? I've seen some generalities regarding GI problems, but little in the way of specifics. I'm still digging through the archives of this site, though. My own immediate negative reaction to RAI centers on the fact that a person must rely on an additive for the rest of her life for survival. This is certainly significant, but if RAI can restore a normal life, except for dependence on synthetic thyroxin, is this such a great price to pay? There must be a number of other consequences, demonstrated by the many factual and emotionally-charged posts to this group. All of our professionals assisting on this problem are recommending RAI. They say it's a no-brainer. For the most part, they are also quite arrogant and seem to be wearing blinders to non-AMA knowledge. Aside from those negatives, they are quite intelligent and learned. What's going on here? Seeking understanding, -- Doug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.