Guest guest Posted November 14, 2003 Report Share Posted November 14, 2003 Tulare County settles mold suit with judge Krant will get $40,000, settling suit filed in 2000 By Florez Staff writer http://www.visaliatimesdelta.com/news/stories/20031114/localnews/64191 2.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- A Tulare County Superior Court judge who said she was exposed to a toxic mold in her courthouse chambers dropped her lawsuit against the county Thursday, and the county agreed to pay her $40,000. Terms of Judge beth Krant's settlement County Counsel Kathleen Bales-Lange and the county were negotiated weeks ago, G. Woods, the county's lawyer, said, but were not finalized until Thursday. " It's a very good settlement on behalf of the county and a settlement that reflects our confidence in the trial that was scheduled to begin in two weeks, " he said. Krant filed a lawsuit against the county and the county counsel after a patch of mold, later found to be stachybotrys, a toxic form of mold, was discovered in 1999 by county employees on a pipe above the ceiling of her court chambers. In her lawsuit, Krant said a " black, slimy mold " contaminated the ceiling tiles in her chambers, leading to hair loss, dizziness, episodic vertigo, acute pain in her abdomen, respiratory distress, ringing in the ears, facial swelling and severe rashes. She also said county officials purposely minimized the extent of the contamination and " concealed " other information after tests were conducted in Courtroom 10 in the newest wing of the courthouse. Krant sued both the county and Bales-Lange, charging that the county counsel was directly responsible for the seriousness of her illness because she " concealed and suppressed material information " about the toxicity and cancer-causing nature of the fungi. Bales-Lange, whose office supervises the county's risk manager, denied that. Krant dismissed her case in exchange for money and assignment of the county's cross-complaints against some of the subcontractors who worked on the courthouse. That means Krant can take over being the plaintiff in those lawsuits against those subcontractors, and the county will no longer be involved. Her lawyer, on, did not return phone calls from the Times-Delta on Thursday seeking comment. Tulare County Board of Supervisors Chairman Jim Maples said he was pleased that the settlement resolved the need for a trial. " We have always maintained, and took many steps to ensure the courthouse is safe, " he said in a statement. " The county remains committed to maintaining a safe work environment for its employees and the public. " The county did not reveal the presence of the mold to the public or to employees until Krant's suit was filed in February 2000, even though mold was discovered above her chambers months before. The county says it has maintained the ongoing services of an industrial hygienist who tests the county courthouse and other county properties. And while there have been periodic discoveries of mold in county properties, tests have found that the buildings are safe for occupancy and use, a county report said. Additionally, the courthouse's air quality has been tested by: an expert hired by the court, investigators with the state Division of Occupational Safety and Health and two independent industrial hygienists. All tests have been consistent with the county's assessment. The county has one remaining mold claim to resolve. It's that of attorney Thommen, who alleges he too fell ill from exposure to toxic mold in the courthouse, Woods said. Email this story Originally published Friday, November 14, 2003 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.