Guest guest Posted January 1, 2003 Report Share Posted January 1, 2003 ----- Original Message ----- From: " Kathi " <pureheart@...> Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 8:10 AM Subject: Re: Biomaterials availability in the U.S. - published 1998 > Looks like most of us have the same reaction to this article......... > > Did I read correctly -- " would advocate for patients??? " Wonder how much > > this author received for writing this article?? > > Carolyn > > > There was a law passed before 1998 that no one could > sue the component and raw materials manufacturers unless > they also sold the finished product. Dow sold the finished > product. If the manufacturer's in the article were sued > it was by Dow, not by any claimants. Maybe another > manufacturer can do that. I think this article is like > many--b***s***. > > Bonnie > > Remember the post or e-mail to me re the biomaterials > in the US and I responded that there was some kind of > law passed protecting the suppliers? I ran across it > this morning. . .it's called the Biomaterials Access > Assurance Act of 1997 and it was intoduced to Congress > by McCain, Leiberman and Gekas. > > " Under this Act, suppliers of raw materials used in the > manufacture of implants (including shunts) can not be > held liable in product liability claims when they are not > involved in the manufacture or sale of the medical device > alleged to cause harm. " > > " The Biomaterials Access Assurance Act of 1997 is an important > step forward in insuring that thousands of individuals who depend > on sunts and other life-saving implantable medical devices will > never have to worry about their availability in the future. " > > > That's why I thought the article was bs--I can't remember all of it, but > > my thoughts go to public relations firms representing insurance > companies > for some reason. > > Bonnie > > RE: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: " Kathi " <pureheart@...> > Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 1:09 PM > Subject: Biomaterials availability in the U.S. - published 1998 > > > > Biomaterials availability in the U.S. > > Pierre M. Galletti * > > Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02913 > > > > > > *Correspondence to Pierre M. Galletti, Brown University, Providence, > > Rhode Island 02913 > > > > Abstract > > > > Slowly but inexorably the commodity materials that constitute over > 95% > > of implantable devices are being withdrawn from the medical market. > U.S. > > manufacturers operate on accumulated reserves and > > therefore are reluctant to say precisely when they will stop > > fabrication. Nonetheless, thousands and perhaps millions of people > [are] > > at risk of not being able to receive the most commonplace medical > > treatments1: vascular grafts, cardiac valves, hip joint prostheses, > > hydrocephalus shunts. > > > > > > > > Journal of Biomedical Materials Research > > Volume 32, Issue 3, 1996. Pages: 289-291 > > > > Journal of Biomedical Materials Research > > Published Online: 6 Dec 1998 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.