Guest guest Posted May 11, 2000 Report Share Posted May 11, 2000 LMAO.... this was brilliant! Thanx Helen - how are ya hon? Love A. If you have ever had a mammogram this is a must see. <A HREF="http://www.geocities.com/heartland/3166/MAMMOGRAM.html">Click here: MAMMOGRAM</A>http://www.geocities.com/heartland/3166/MAMMOGRAM.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2004 Report Share Posted April 6, 2004 > The good news is it didn't hurt a bit (it did a tad before when things were > still inflated). I got quite a reaction when I told the technician I had lost a > significant amount of weight since my last one and I know they want to note > that for the Doctor, to help explain the changes in tissue. She asked me how > much and I got to say 170 pounds and she was gratifyingly impressed and said > that was the most " significant " weight loss she had ever put on the form and I > look great! Made my day. > Well my point was to encourage others who may have been putting off this > important test that it was a BREEZE with my deflated boobs and not to be afraid > of it. (I was a bit nervous). > So, how was YOUR day?? > in WA > who does kind of wish she could afford surgery to perk the girls up a bit. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~` LOL, I know mine didn't hurt either,which surprised me.The tech said that the machine they were using didn't squeeze as bad as the old ones did.I can't afford for the saggie maggies to be lifted so guess they will just keep hanging out...lol 170 loss WoW isn't this the best surgery ever????!!!! God bless, Pat > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2004 Report Share Posted April 6, 2004 You said it Pat! This is the BEST surgery ever!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2004 Report Share Posted April 6, 2004 In a message dated 4/6/2004 3:06:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Tops@... writes: > She asked me how > much and I got to say 170 pounds and she was gratifyingly impressed and said > > that was the most " significant " weight loss she had ever put on the form and > I > look great! Made my day. Ain't life grand, ?!! My mammogram was easier, too, but I purchased a disposable pad to use, too, which seem to help a lot. They get so far back on my chest wall that it makes me want to back up (they ended up having to do six x-rays instead of just four, and the mammographer pieced them together, because mine were hard to do). Congratulations on your fabulous weight loss! How much weight have you lost since your tummy tuck? Hugs and blessings, Ann Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 7, 2004 Report Share Posted April 7, 2004 Well Ann after my panni surgery I weighed on Dr. K's scale at 211 and cried tears of joy to see a number like that. Since then I have lost only 21 more pounds and worked harder for them then the 100 prior I think. If this is where my weight loss stops I am certainly okay with it I am a long long way from where I stared. I have lost 165.5 since the day of my surgery. 177 from my highest weight recorded with my Primary Doctor and since my pre surgery mammogram I have come to actually enjoy my exercise time and I am trying to work through some of my issues with food so perhaps I will be able to drop a few more pounds. Who knows? But I sure can say I am SO GLAD I made the choice to have this surgery and to have it in California with Dr. K. I used to joke about having a mammogram was making my breast in to a pancake and I got a giggle seeing that is exactly what it looked like before they even started to squeeze. Sometimes all you can do is laugh, way better than crying. Thanks for asking! Big hugs from Washington! - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 7, 2004 Report Share Posted April 7, 2004 Well Ann after my panni surgery I weighed on Dr. K's scale at 211 and cried tears of joy to see a number like that. Since then I have lost only 21 more pounds and worked harder for them then the 100 prior I think. If this is where my weight loss stops I am certainly okay with it I am a long long way from where I stared. I have lost 165.5 since the day of my surgery. 177 from my highest weight recorded with my Primary Doctor and since my pre surgery mammogram I have come to actually enjoy my exercise time and I am trying to work through some of my issues with food so perhaps I will be able to drop a few more pounds. Who knows? But I sure can say I am SO GLAD I made the choice to have this surgery and to have it in California with Dr. K. I used to joke about having a mammogram was making my breast in to a pancake and I got a giggle seeing that is exactly what it looked like before they even started to squeeze. Sometimes all you can do is laugh, way better than crying. Thanks for asking! Big hugs from Washington! - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 7, 2004 Report Share Posted April 7, 2004 Hi ! I feel your pain! (Not the mammogram -- the deflated boobs!) I'm saving my money for a breast lift and hopefully can do it sometime next year. I had a mammogram after my surgery, too. Though there was some minor discomfort when they were trying to get up to the underarm area, it really was so much easier than it used to be! Thank goodness, because I have fibrous breasts and it's very important for me to have regular exams. sort of an odd little perk of the surgery. At least until the lift. LOL! Hugs! Tracey > Just a report that I had my first mammogram since my DS. I found it > interesting that they didn't have to squeeze the boobs to get a nice flat pancake they > just set them in the thing and they were plenty flat. That is the bad news. > The good news is it didn't hurt a bit (it did a tad before when things were > still inflated). I got quite a reaction when I told the technician I had lost a > significant amount of weight since my last one and I know they want to note > that for the Doctor, to help explain the changes in tissue. She asked me how > much and I got to say 170 pounds and she was gratifyingly impressed and said > that was the most " significant " weight loss she had ever put on the form and I > look great! Made my day. > Well my point was to encourage others who may have been putting off this > important test that it was a BREEZE with my deflated boobs and not to be afraid > of it. (I was a bit nervous). > So, how was YOUR day?? > in WA > who does kind of wish she could afford surgery to perk the girls up a bit. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 7, 2004 Report Share Posted April 7, 2004 Hi ! I feel your pain! (Not the mammogram -- the deflated boobs!) I'm saving my money for a breast lift and hopefully can do it sometime next year. I had a mammogram after my surgery, too. Though there was some minor discomfort when they were trying to get up to the underarm area, it really was so much easier than it used to be! Thank goodness, because I have fibrous breasts and it's very important for me to have regular exams. sort of an odd little perk of the surgery. At least until the lift. LOL! Hugs! Tracey > Just a report that I had my first mammogram since my DS. I found it > interesting that they didn't have to squeeze the boobs to get a nice flat pancake they > just set them in the thing and they were plenty flat. That is the bad news. > The good news is it didn't hurt a bit (it did a tad before when things were > still inflated). I got quite a reaction when I told the technician I had lost a > significant amount of weight since my last one and I know they want to note > that for the Doctor, to help explain the changes in tissue. She asked me how > much and I got to say 170 pounds and she was gratifyingly impressed and said > that was the most " significant " weight loss she had ever put on the form and I > look great! Made my day. > Well my point was to encourage others who may have been putting off this > important test that it was a BREEZE with my deflated boobs and not to be afraid > of it. (I was a bit nervous). > So, how was YOUR day?? > in WA > who does kind of wish she could afford surgery to perk the girls up a bit. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 7, 2004 Report Share Posted April 7, 2004 wow you are doing so good i bet you look fab. take care amber Re: mammogram Well Ann after my panni surgery I weighed on Dr. K's scale at 211 and cried tears of joy to see a number like that. Since then I have lost only 21 more pounds and worked harder for them then the 100 prior I think. If this is where my weight loss stops I am certainly okay with it I am a long long way from where I stared. I have lost 165.5 since the day of my surgery. 177 from my highest weight recorded with my Primary Doctor and since my pre surgery mammogram I have come to actually enjoy my exercise time and I am trying to work through some of my issues with food so perhaps I will be able to drop a few more pounds. Who knows? But I sure can say I am SO GLAD I made the choice to have this surgery and to have it in California with Dr. K. I used to joke about having a mammogram was making my breast in to a pancake and I got a giggle seeing that is exactly what it looked like before they even started to squeeze. Sometimes all you can do is laugh, way better than crying. Thanks for asking! Big hugs from Washington! - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 7, 2004 Report Share Posted April 7, 2004 wow you are doing so good i bet you look fab. take care amber Re: mammogram Well Ann after my panni surgery I weighed on Dr. K's scale at 211 and cried tears of joy to see a number like that. Since then I have lost only 21 more pounds and worked harder for them then the 100 prior I think. If this is where my weight loss stops I am certainly okay with it I am a long long way from where I stared. I have lost 165.5 since the day of my surgery. 177 from my highest weight recorded with my Primary Doctor and since my pre surgery mammogram I have come to actually enjoy my exercise time and I am trying to work through some of my issues with food so perhaps I will be able to drop a few more pounds. Who knows? But I sure can say I am SO GLAD I made the choice to have this surgery and to have it in California with Dr. K. I used to joke about having a mammogram was making my breast in to a pancake and I got a giggle seeing that is exactly what it looked like before they even started to squeeze. Sometimes all you can do is laugh, way better than crying. Thanks for asking! Big hugs from Washington! - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 8, 2004 Report Share Posted July 8, 2004 Helen, Hope your test results come out okay. I've got to get my yearly check up and mammogram scheduled. I'm taking a break from painting my living/dining room and my kitchen. The fellow is coming to reappraise it tomorrow afternoon. Hopefully he will rate it high enough so that I can get a bit of cash out of my refinancing. I am going to use the money to get some past medical bills paid off for myself and for my son. Anyway, back to painting. I am almost finished and it does look good, if I do say so myself....lol. Hugs, Libby On Jul 9, 2004, at 12:20 AM, angelbear1129@... wrote: >  Had my mammogram done yesterday, they read it this morning, and doc > called me this morning, saying the mass that was being watched has > doubled in size since six months ago, so I have to go in for a > magnifying on the right side at 7am in the morning to see if we are > dealing with cancer... >  So how is your day??? ) > ((( Love and Hugs ))) > Helen >  >  >  > >  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2004 Report Share Posted July 9, 2004 Good luck to you.I sure hope it isn't cancer. Please keep us posted. -- Mammogram Had my mammogram done yesterday, they read it this morning, and doc called me this morning, saying the mass that was being watched has doubled in size since six months ago, so I have to go in for a magnifying on the right side at 7am in the morning to see if we are dealing with cancer... So how is your day??? ) ((( Love and Hugs ))) Helen angelbear1129@...One wordfrees us of all the weight and pain of life: That word is,Love! Sophocles Surnames I am following:Mc Intosh/Mac Intosh/Mac k Intosh -- Lambert -- Osterhout -- Spring -- Fauver -- Tilden -- Handy -- Haller -- Leininger -- Beckham -- Godden -- Brown -- -- Barbara -- Losure -- Spade -- Ferris -- -- Chronninger -- Myles -- Weirich -- Shonk -- Inches -- Burditt -- 's -- Frosch/Frozeck -- Turrittin -- Proudfoot/Stoltzfuss -- Mattocks -- Oliver -- Peth -- Etc.... ~~~~ *** ~~~ *** ~~~ *** ~~~~ The Being Sick CommunityMessage Archives-/messagesChat:- Scheduled Chats at /chatBookmarks:-Add a website URL you have found useful./linksPersonal Complaints or problems:-Please contact a moderator email: -owner Subscription Details:-1) Individual email - means that every email sent to the list you receive.2) Daily Digest - sends you 25 messages in one single email for you to browse. This is an excellent option if you receive alot of email.3) Web only/No mail - means that you can pop into groups at your convenience and receive no email.To modify your subscription settings please visit:- /joinTo subscribe or unsubscribe please email:--subscribe -unsubscribe This group is not intended to diagnose or treat illnesses. No one on this group is qualified to diagnose medical conditions. If you feel you need medical attention, seek the advice of a qualified physician.~~~~ *** ~~~ *** ~~~ *** ~~~~When nothing is sure, everything is possible.--- Margaret Drabble~~~~ *** ~~~ *** ~~~ *** ~~~~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2006 Report Share Posted May 13, 2006 A word of caution to those who aren’t yet aware of the fact.  Mammograms have been shown in seven randomised controlled trials to produce no benefits in terms of increased overall survival or reduced overall mortality and have been shown in the UK to result in a 500% increase in unnecessary surgical intervention for ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS) apart for the many false positives.  I can provide references for those interested. Don Convenor/Research Officer Cancer Information & Support Society St Leonards NSW From: qxci-english [mailto:qxci-english ] On Behalf Of jadespring2003 Sent: Saturday, 13 May 2006 9:34 AM qxci-english Subject: mammogram Just a word of encouragement out there. I didn't have to get a mammogram to figure out what was going on with my left breast. I started out with thermography. One of the doctors said something looked suspicious, another dr. said he didn't think it was anything serious. One MD wanted me to get a mammogram but I opted for an ultrasound instead which showed a benign cyst. There are a lot of false positives with mammograms. I also had a cancer tumor marker blood test which turned out negative. Mammograms, if done regularly, can CAUSE breast cancer. Needle aspiration is also starting to catch on which is supposed to be less invasive than taking a biopsy of a lump. They give an anesthetic before drawing out the milk sample which will show if there are cancer cells in breast. So think carefully and out of the box and if you can, get a good MD whose up on the latest to back you up, not someone who was schooled in the dark ages. is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2006 Report Share Posted May 14, 2006 > From: " jadespring2003 " jadespring2003@... > Date: Sat May 13, 2006 9:56am(PDT) > Subject: mammogram > > Just a word of encouragement out there. I didn't have to get a > mammogram to figure out what was going on with my left breast. I > started out with thermography. One of the doctors said something > looked suspicious, another dr. said he didn't think it was anything > serious. One MD wanted me to get a mammogram but I opted for an > ultrasound instead which showed a benign cyst. There are a lot of > false positives with mammograms. I also had a cancer tumor marker > blood test which turned out negative. Mammograms, if done regularly, > can CAUSE breast cancer. Needle aspiration is also starting to catch > on which is supposed to be less invasive than taking a biopsy of a > lump. They give an anesthetic before drawing out the milk sample > which will show if there are cancer cells in breast. So think > carefully and out of the box and if you can, get a good MD whose up on > the latest to back you up, not someone who was schooled in the dark ages. > > is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC > > is, I just had a thermography done, the result was " equivocal " , rating 3. I did on my own. However, my family doctor insisted that I take a mammogram. I really don't want to have x-ray since I have a thyroid nodule. What kind of tumor marker did you do? How did you get an ultrasound? It is great it can detect a benign cyst, did you want to remove it? mei Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2006 Report Share Posted May 16, 2006 Get yourself a holisitc MD to help you out. He can write a blood test for you for cancer tumor markers and he can also give you an order for an ultrasound. Or even needle aspiration! You have to be your own advocate and ask for what you want but we need the help of allopathic doctors--they are out there; you can find one. is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC > > > From: " jadespring2003 " jadespring2003@... > > Date: Sat May 13, 2006 9:56am(PDT) > > Subject: mammogram > > > > Just a word of encouragement out there. I didn't have to get a > > mammogram to figure out what was going on with my left breast. I > > started out with thermography. One of the doctors said something > > looked suspicious, another dr. said he didn't think it was anything > > serious. One MD wanted me to get a mammogram but I opted for an > > ultrasound instead which showed a benign cyst. There are a lot of > > false positives with mammograms. I also had a cancer tumor marker > > blood test which turned out negative. Mammograms, if done regularly, > > can CAUSE breast cancer. Needle aspiration is also starting to catch > > on which is supposed to be less invasive than taking a biopsy of a > > lump. They give an anesthetic before drawing out the milk sample > > which will show if there are cancer cells in breast. So think > > carefully and out of the box and if you can, get a good MD whose up on > > the latest to back you up, not someone who was schooled in the dark ages. > > > > is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC > > > > > > is, > > I just had a thermography done, the result was " equivocal " , rating 3. I did on my own. However, my family doctor insisted that I take a mammogram. I really don't want to have x-ray since I have a thyroid nodule. > > What kind of tumor marker did you do? How did you get an ultrasound? It is great it can detect a benign cyst, did you want to remove it? > > mei > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2006 Report Share Posted May 16, 2006 You know, most MDs are so stuck in the dark ages. When the radiologist read my ultrasound and pronounced the lump a benign cyst, she then proceeded to tell me, " Get a mammogram once in a while. There's not that much radiation involved. " Oi vei is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC > > A word of caution to those who aren't yet aware of the fact. Mammograms > have been shown in seven randomised controlled trials to produce no benefits > in terms of increased overall survival or reduced overall mortality and have > been shown in the UK to result in a 500% increase in unnecessary surgical > intervention for ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS) apart for the many false > positives. I can provide references for those interested. > > > > Don > > Convenor/Research Officer > > Cancer Information & Support Society > > St Leonards NSW > > > > _____ > > From: qxci-english [mailto:qxci-english ] On > Behalf Of jadespring2003 > Sent: Saturday, 13 May 2006 9:34 AM > qxci-english > Subject: mammogram > > > > Just a word of encouragement out there. I didn't have to get a > mammogram to figure out what was going on with my left breast. I > started out with thermography. One of the doctors said something > looked suspicious, another dr. said he didn't think it was anything > serious. One MD wanted me to get a mammogram but I opted for an > ultrasound instead which showed a benign cyst. There are a lot of > false positives with mammograms. I also had a cancer tumor marker > blood test which turned out negative. Mammograms, if done regularly, > can CAUSE breast cancer. Needle aspiration is also starting to catch > on which is supposed to be less invasive than taking a biopsy of a > lump. They give an anesthetic before drawing out the milk sample > which will show if there are cancer cells in breast. So think > carefully and out of the box and if you can, get a good MD whose up on > the latest to back you up, not someone who was schooled in the dark ages. > > is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC > > > > > > > > ............................................ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2006 Report Share Posted May 17, 2006 make sure you do not have the gene for breast cancer before doing a mamogram. the ama(JAMA) has stated that one in ten women develope breast cancer from a mammogram. this means that if you have the gene u will have a greater predispotion to cancer which will increase those odds greatly a further note: can you imagine giving out a free screening (in any field of business) knowing that one in ten folks who take the screen will be worth 100-200k becuase of what the screen will do to them? the whole field...of mammography screening is another scare tactic as is most of modern medicine. modern medicne is incredible when it comes to genetic work and hereditary diseases but with chronic diseases of any kind, including cancer, the last place to turn is for diagnostics and treatment is your westernn medical profession From: mt <mtien@...>Reply-qxci-english To: qxci-english Subject: Re: mammogramDate: Sun, 14 May 2006 21:37:21 -0400> From: "jadespring2003" jadespring2003@...> Date: Sat May 13, 2006 9:56am(PDT)> Subject: mammogram>> Just a word of encouragement out there. I didn't have to get a> mammogram to figure out what was going on with my left breast. I> started out with thermography. One of the doctors said something> looked suspicious, another dr. said he didn't think it was anything> serious. One MD wanted me to get a mammogram but I opted for an> ultrasound instead which showed a benign cyst. There are a lot of> false positives with mammograms. I also had a cancer tumor marker> blood test which turned out negative. Mammograms, if done regularly,> can CAUSE breast cancer. Needle aspiration is also starting to catch> on which is supposed to be less invasive than taking a biopsy of a> lump. They give an anesthetic before drawing out the milk sample> which will show if there are cancer cells in breast. So think> carefully and out of the box and if you can, get a good MD whose up on> the latest to back you up, not someone who was schooled in the dark ages.>> is Rotella, M.Ac., CNC>>is,I just had a thermography done, the result was "equivocal" , rating 3. I did on my own. However, my family doctor insisted that I take a mammogram. I really don't want to have x-ray since I have a thyroid nodule.What kind of tumor marker did you do? How did you get an ultrasound? It is great it can detect a benign cyst, did you want to remove it?mei............................................ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2009 Report Share Posted June 20, 2009 Hi Ruth - this is a no brainer. You need a biopsy. The two docs disagree, why take a chance? If it's CLL, fine. If it's not, you need to do something. In a message dated 6/20/2009 11:56:49 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, rsnider@... writes: Hi Everyone, Prepare for an epic! I have a problem that I need some input.I started the Revlimid trial last September. I have had a few bumps in the road, but all in all, I am very happy with my results. In November, here in Beaumont, I had a annual mammogram. Of course, it was full of lymph nodes, as I was in full flare at that time. My PCP and the Radiologist here wanted a biopsy done. I decided to have Dr. O'Brien look at it. She said it was just CLL. I have "stewed" about it all this time. I call Dr. O'Brien's PA and requested an appointment at MDA for their breast people to look at it. Never can remember what that department is named. I never did see a doctor, but they did another mammogram. When I read the report, it said "Nodules in both breasts are highly suggestive of malignancy", "Axillary adenopathy in both breasts are highly suggestive of malignancy". I email Dr. O'Brien, and she not to worry, it was CLL. That was a couple weeks ago. This morning I received a letter from a Dr. Adrada at MDA, stating that the Radiologist who read the mammogram, highly recommended a biopsy. I have just emailed Dr. O'Brien requesting she arrange the biopsy. There is so much about this I do not understand. Dr. O'Brien is a great CLL doctor, but not inclined to go into detail in her explanations. If this is a secondary cancer, the decisions become clear. If it is CLL, in the breast tissue, what does that mean exactly? As all of you see, I am very disturbed about the whole thing. Happy to hear all your ideas. Ruth P.S. Had my checkup May, even bone marrow. My blood counts are normal in all areas except platelets. They are still low. My bone marrow Lymphocyte percent has dropped from 74% to 49%. Absolute Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Monocyte, Eosinophil. and Basophil counts are in normal ranges. YEH!! A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2009 Report Share Posted June 20, 2009 RuthDid Dr. O'Brien give you any reason not to have the biopsy (health wise)? I am a CLL patient who was diagnosed with breast cancer 2 years ago. It was caught early and I'm doing well with both, but would encourage you to go with your " gut " which is clearly telling you to pursue this or you would have let it go a long time ago. If the biopsy shows no cancer - great. If there is breast cancer you need to deal with it now. PatOn Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Ruth Snider <rsnider@...> wrote: Hi Everyone, Prepare for an epic! I have a problem that I need some input.I started the Revlimid trial last September. I have had a few bumps in the road, but all in all, I am very happy with my results.  In November, here in Beaumont, I had a annual mammogram. Of course, it was full of lymph nodes, as I was in full flare at that time. My PCP and the Radiologist here wanted a biopsy done. I decided to have Dr. O'Brien look at it. She said it was just CLL. I have " stewed " about it all this time. I call Dr. O'Brien's PA and requested an appointment at MDA for their breast people to look at it. Never can remember what that department is named. I never did see a doctor, but they did another mammogram. When I read the report, it said " Nodules in both breasts are highly suggestive of malignancy " , " Axillary adenopathy in both breasts are highly suggestive of malignancy " . I email Dr. O'Brien, and she not to worry, it was CLL. That was a couple weeks ago. This morning I received a letter from a Dr. Adrada at MDA, stating that the Radiologist who read the mammogram, highly recommended a biopsy. I have just emailed Dr. O'Brien requesting she arrange the biopsy. There is so much about this I do not understand. Dr. O'Brien is a great CLL doctor, but not inclined to go into detail in her explanations. If this is a secondary cancer, the decisions become clear. If it is CLL, in the breast tissue, what does that mean exactly? As all of you see, I am very disturbed about the whole thing. Happy to hear all your ideas. Ruth  P.S. Had my checkup May, even bone marrow. My blood counts are normal in all areas except platelets. They are still low. My bone marrow Lymphocyte percent has dropped from 74% to 49%. Absolute Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Monocyte, Eosinophil. and Basophil counts are in normal ranges. YEH!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2009 Report Share Posted June 20, 2009 Pat, No she did not give a reason. I will insist on the biopsy. Writing about it has cleared my mind about the whole thing. I am sure Dr. O'Brien will arrange it. Ruth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 30, 2011 Report Share Posted April 30, 2011 Hi Bee, Is Mammogram safe? if we get healthy on your pgm, do we need it 1/yr or 2/yr? I had 1 back in 1999. Thanks -- Wanda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.