Guest guest Posted January 27, 2011 Report Share Posted January 27, 2011 Getting Pregnant While Unhealthy & Breastfeeding When a person has candida it means they are very unhealthy. Being unhealthy alone means the body is already lacking the nutrients and strength it needs in order to support a pregnancy. And if a woman is also breastfeeding a previous child it just adds insult to injury, not only because of her own health but also for the health of the developing fetus. The least a woman can do when she is in that situation is to stop breastfeeding since the breastfed child would be old enough to eat normal foods and can be perfectly healthy without breast milk. Dr. Weston A. Price writes the following in his book Nutrition and Physical Degeneration, Chapter 17, One origin of physical deformities - available online: http://journeytoforever.org/farm_library/price/price17.html It is significant that while these important factors are just coming to light in our modernized civilization, the evidence clearly indicates that several so-called primitive races have been conscious of the need for safeguarding motherhood from reproductive overloads which would reduce the capacity for efficient reproduction. For example, G. T. Baden (3) in his book " Among the Ibos of Nigeria " states: It is not only a matter of disgrace but an actual abomination, for an Ibo woman to bear children at shorter intervals than about three years. . . . The idea of a fixed minimum period between births is based on several sound principles. The belief prevails strongly that it is necessary for this interval to elapse in order to ensure the mother being able to recuperate her strength completely, and thus be in a thoroughly fit condition to bear another child. Should a second child be born within the prescribed period the theory is held that it must inevitably be weak and sickly, and its chances jeopardized. Similarly, the Indians of Peru, Ecuador and Columbia have been familiar with the necessity of preventing pregnancy overloads of the mother. Whiffen (4) in his book " North-West Amazons " states: The numbers (of pregnant women) are remarkable in view of the fact that husbands abstain from any intercourse with their wives, not only during pregnancy but also throughout the period of lactation--far more prolonged with them than with Europeans. The result is that two and a half years between each child is the minimum difference of age, and in the majority of cases it is even greater. It may also be important to note that the Amazon Indians have been conscious of the fact that these matters are related to the nutrition of both parents. Whiffen states that: These Indians share the belief of many peoples of the lower cultures that the food eaten by the parents--to some degree of both parents--will have a definite influence upon the birth, appearance, or character of the child. This problem of the consciousness among primitives of the need for spacing children has been emphasized by Brown (5) in his studies among Melanesians and Polynesians in which he reports relative to the natives on one of the Islands as follows: After the birth of a child the husband was not supposed to cohabit with his wife until the child could walk. If a child was weak or sickly, the people would say, speaking of the parents, " Ah, well, they have only themselves to blame. " All the best, Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.