24 Reasons Why You Should Never Vaccinate Infants

[Guest guest]

24 Reasons Why You Should Never Vaccinate Infants:

Originally by Jagannath Chatterjee and updated by KP Stoller, MD

President, International Hyperbaric Medical Assoc

Medical Director, Hyperbaric Medical Center of New Mexico

1.

There are no long-term studies on vaccine safety. Very short-term

unscientific tests are carried out where the vaccinated subjects are

checked against another group who are given another vaccine.

Technically

the tests should be carried out against a non-vaccinated group. No one

really knows what protocols are followed at such industry-sponsored

trials.

2. There has never been any attempt to compare a

vaccinated population against a non vaccinated population to know what

vaccines are doing to

the children and the society.

3.The child receives not one but many vaccines. There are no tests to determine

the effects of multiple vaccines.

4.

There is no scientific basis for vaccinating infants. As per senior

doctors quoted by the Times of India, " Children suffer from less that

2% of vaccine preventable illnesses but 100% of the vaccines are

targeted towards them. " The vaccine pioneers who have recommended

abundant caution before vaccinating the population have never advocated

Mass vaccinations.

5. Children are vaccinated simply because

parents can be frightened to forcefully vaccinate their children.

Vaccinating infants is the most profitable business both for the

manufacturers as well as the doctors.

6.The Government of India has come out with a quarter page advertisement in The

Hindu warning

parents not to vaccinate beyond the Government approved vaccines.

Parents have been advised against vaccinating in private clinics and

hospitals.

7. The Orissa Chapter of the Indian Association of Pediatricians has admitted in

a letter to the CM, Orissa, that private clinics and

hospitals are ill equipped to store vaccines and warned parents not to

vaccinate upon the advise of private practitioners and hospitals.

8.

Vaccines contain untested heavy metals, cancer causing substances,

toxic chemicals, live and genetically modified viruses, contaminated

serum

containing animal viruses and foreign genetic material,

extremely toxic decontaminants and adjuvants, untested antibiotics,

none of which can be injected without causing any harm.

9. The CDC of USA, the vaccine watchdog, has publicly admitted that its

much-publicized 2003 study denying any link between vaccines and autism,

is flawed. The Chief of CDC Dr Gerberding has confessed to the media

(CNN) that vaccines can cause " autism like symptoms " . The Autism

epidemicis found only in those countries that have allowed mass

vaccinations.

10. In the year 1999, the US Government instructed

vaccine manufacturers to remove mercury from vaccines " with immediate

effect " . But mercury

still remains a part of many vaccines.

11. " Mercury free " vaccines contain 0.05mcg of mercury, enough to permanently

damage a infant.

12.

IN INDIA NO ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO ENSURE THAT MERCURY AND OTHER

HEAVY METALS ARE REMOVED FROM VACCINES SIMPLY BECAUSE IT WOULD MAKE

VACCINES COSTLIER.

13. In a reply to then President Sri Abdul Kalam,

the Health Ministry informed, " mercury is required to make the vaccines

safe " . To the authors query that " what are these vaccines that it

requires the second most dangerous neurotoxin, mercury, to make them

safe? " , there was no reply.

14. Mercury used in vaccines is

second in toxicity only to the radioactive substance, Uranium. It is a

neurotoxin that can damage the entire nervous system of the infant in

no time.

15. Mercury accumulates in fat. The brain being made

entirely of fat cells, most of the mercury accumulates there giving

rise to the peculiar symptoms of the autistic children.

16.

The mercury used in vaccines is ethyl mercury. According to Indian

doctors this is 1000 times more toxic than the usual methyl mercury.

17. The aluminum present in vaccines makes the mercury, in any form, 100 times

more toxic.

18.

As per an independent study aluminum and formaldehyde present in

vaccines can increase the toxicity of mercury, in any form, by 1000

times.

19.

As per a Tehelka article on Autism, children are receiving 250 times

more mercury through vaccines than they can possibly tolerate. The

same

article states that if one considers the WHO limit for mercury in

water, they are receiving 50,000 times the limit. The limits set,

incidentally, are for adults and not infants.

20.

Autism in India has emerged as the most rapidly growing epidemic

amongst children. From 1 in 500 it has steadily climbed to 1 in 37

today. As per Indian doctors, " You can go to any class of any school

today and find an autistic child. "

21 The live polio viruses used in the Oral Polio Vaccine has caused Vaccine

Attributed Paralytic Polio in more than 65,000 children as per doctors of the

Indian Medical Association.

In the USA this vaccine has caused polio 16 years after administration.

The OPV has also let loose a new strain of polio in both India and

Africa. The OPV is banned in other countries.

22. In the USA

vaccine adverse effects are recorded and the Government offers

compensation of millions of dollars to victims (the most recent

case

in its Vaccine Court may have received upto $200 million in damages).

The Indian Government simply refuses to acknowledge that vaccines can

cause deaths and permanent disability.

23. In the USA parents

are informed about vaccine after effects and their consent has to be

taken before vaccinating their children. In India the Government

assures the population through massive

advertising campaigns that vaccines are extremely safe. Parents refusing to

vaccinate are threatened by the administration.

24. THERE IS NO SYSTEM OF TREATMENT TO TREAT A VACCINE DAMAGED CHILD.

The

parents have to run from one hospital to another. The Government turns

a blind eye and refuses to even acknowledge the vaccine connection.

TREMORA

Win a MacBook Air or iPod touch with 7.

http://au.docs./homepageset

[Guest guest]

EXCELLANT INFORMATION !!

 

{{{THANKS FOR SENDING}}}

 

~ Dee

" When Life Gives Ya Lemons...Make lemonade "

and if a friend has Vodka...

Have a Party!

From: tremora howells <tremorahowells@...>

Subject: [ ] 24 Reasons Why You Should Never Vaccinate Infants

Date: Monday, September 1, 2008, 10:57 PM

24 Reasons Why You Should Never Vaccinate Infants:

Originally by Jagannath Chatterjee and updated by KP Stoller, MD

President, International Hyperbaric Medical Assoc

Medical Director, Hyperbaric Medical Center of New Mexico

1.

There are no long-term studies on vaccine safety. Very short-term

unscientific tests are carried out where the vaccinated subjects are

checked against another group who are given another vaccine.

Technically

the tests should be carried out against a non-vaccinated group. No one

really knows what protocols are followed at such industry-sponsored

trials.

2. There has never been any attempt to compare a

vaccinated population against a non vaccinated population to know what

vaccines are doing to

the children and the society.

3.The child receives not one but many vaccines. There are no tests to determine

the effects of multiple vaccines.

4.

There is no scientific basis for vaccinating infants. As per senior

doctors quoted by the Times of India, " Children suffer from less that

2% of vaccine preventable illnesses but 100% of the vaccines are

targeted towards them. " The vaccine pioneers who have recommended

abundant caution before vaccinating the population have never advocated

Mass vaccinations.

5. Children are vaccinated simply because

parents can be frightened to forcefully vaccinate their children.

Vaccinating infants is the most profitable business both for the

manufacturers as well as the doctors.

6.The Government of India has come out with a quarter page advertisement in The

Hindu warning

parents not to vaccinate beyond the Government approved vaccines.

Parents have been advised against vaccinating in private clinics and

hospitals.

7. The Orissa Chapter of the Indian Association of Pediatricians has admitted in

a letter to the CM, Orissa, that private clinics and

hospitals are ill equipped to store vaccines and warned parents not to

vaccinate upon the advise of private practitioners and hospitals.

8.

Vaccines contain untested heavy metals, cancer causing substances,

toxic chemicals, live and genetically modified viruses, contaminated

serum

containing animal viruses and foreign genetic material,

extremely toxic decontaminants and adjuvants, untested antibiotics,

none of which can be injected without causing any harm.

9. The CDC of USA, the vaccine watchdog, has publicly admitted that its

much-publicized 2003 study denying any link between vaccines and autism,

is flawed. The Chief of CDC Dr Gerberding has confessed to the media

(CNN) that vaccines can cause " autism like symptoms " . The Autism

epidemicis found only in those countries that have allowed mass

vaccinations.

10. In the year 1999, the US Government instructed

vaccine manufacturers to remove mercury from vaccines " with immediate

effect " . But mercury

still remains a part of many vaccines.

11. " Mercury free " vaccines contain 0.05mcg of mercury, enough to permanently

damage a infant.

12.

IN INDIA NO ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO ENSURE THAT MERCURY AND OTHER

HEAVY METALS ARE REMOVED FROM VACCINES SIMPLY BECAUSE IT WOULD MAKE

VACCINES COSTLIER.

13. In a reply to then President Sri Abdul Kalam,

the Health Ministry informed, " mercury is required to make the vaccines

safe " . To the authors query that " what are these vaccines that it

requires the second most dangerous neurotoxin, mercury, to make them

safe? " , there was no reply.

14. Mercury used in vaccines is

second in toxicity only to the radioactive substance, Uranium. It is a

neurotoxin that can damage the entire nervous system of the infant in

no time.

15. Mercury accumulates in fat. The brain being made

entirely of fat cells, most of the mercury accumulates there giving

rise to the peculiar symptoms of the autistic children.

16.

The mercury used in vaccines is ethyl mercury. According to Indian

doctors this is 1000 times more toxic than the usual methyl mercury.

17. The aluminum present in vaccines makes the mercury, in any form, 100 times

more toxic.

18.

As per an independent study aluminum and formaldehyde present in

vaccines can increase the toxicity of mercury, in any form, by 1000

times.

19.

As per a Tehelka article on Autism, children are receiving 250 times

more mercury through vaccines than they can possibly tolerate. The

same

article states that if one considers the WHO limit for mercury in

water, they are receiving 50,000 times the limit. The limits set,

incidentally, are for adults and not infants.

20.

Autism in India has emerged as the most rapidly growing epidemic

amongst children. From 1 in 500 it has steadily climbed to 1 in 37

today. As per Indian doctors, " You can go to any class of any school

today and find an autistic child. "

21 The live polio viruses used in the Oral Polio Vaccine has caused Vaccine

Attributed Paralytic Polio in more than 65,000 children as per doctors of the

Indian Medical Association.

In the USA this vaccine has caused polio 16 years after administration.

The OPV has also let loose a new strain of polio in both India and

Africa. The OPV is banned in other countries.

22. In the USA

vaccine adverse effects are recorded and the Government offers

compensation of millions of dollars to victims (the most recent

case

in its Vaccine Court may have received upto $200 million in damages).

The Indian Government simply refuses to acknowledge that vaccines can

cause deaths and permanent disability.

23. In the USA parents

are informed about vaccine after effects and their consent has to be

taken before vaccinating their children. In India the Government

assures the population through massive

advertising campaigns that vaccines are extremely safe. Parents refusing to

vaccinate are threatened by the administration.

24. THERE IS NO SYSTEM OF TREATMENT TO TREAT A VACCINE DAMAGED CHILD.

The

parents have to run from one hospital to another. The Government turns

a blind eye and refuses to even acknowledge the vaccine connection.

TREMORA

Win a MacBook Air or iPod touch with 7. http://au.docs. /

homepageset

[Guest guest]

I tell you what, I have studied mercury for years, even speaking to and

observing a few adults who were diagnosed mercury poisoned who had

immediately-obvious outward neurological damage, and some of the information I

have learned was directly received by conversations with Dr. Cutler, who

wrote a book on the subject.  It stands to reason that just by virtue of body

weight, it is like I said before, there are infants who have been immediately

killed.  If an adult can become permanently injured when their body systems are

so much more highly developed, how can a, in some cases, developing child

withstand being poisoned?

 

This is the most comprehensive, consistent list of information I have ever

seen.  I cannot fathom how any seeing human being can read even a few of these

points, and then stick their arm out, and as I said before, play Russian

roulette.  Even based on one or two or three points, any thinking person using

the brain they were given to peruse information, I really do believe, would more

than likely step back and question the safety of something so flawed - -

supported only by the very industry making all the money from it.  If a mechanic

working on a stood to make a ton of money off someone, tell me how many people

in this economy would not question it before handing over the contents of their

entire wallet?  But yet when a government agency stands to make more money than

we can imagine ever seeing or having, people shrug. 

 

I started copying and pasting, but really, I could have gone on doing that time

and time again without stopping, as each point was significant.  Even just these

should be enough to frighten someone.  It is just the point I made,

that considering the very miniscule chance someone would contract one of these

diseases (which is nearly nill), the statistical chances of, instead, receiving

neurological damage is just common sense if you can add two plus two.  It

doesn't take a scientist to figure this out, only as I said before, cause and

effect reasoning.  These points alone are tremendously mind-blowing to me, and

it is a proven fact that mercury does indeed have an affinity for the brain, the

one place where it can do the most damage since, even just considering all the

functions controlled by the brain stem (which is only one small, but significant

area) that if malfunctioning, can kill us.  Ah-ha, but mercury and the other

toxins doesn't kill us

immediately, it is slow and insidious because the bodies of some people

desperately try to metabolize the poisons.  And those whose bodies are

compromised by all the other things in the environment I won't even bother to

mention, well, a human body just wasn't designed to fight that.  Even just these

points are truly excellent.  I trust the vaccine debate has now ended, when it

should have after only a few posts.  When the very organization that advocates

something which they have a personal financial interest in admits they got

" caught, " then game over, as far as I am concerned.  Thanks for this, amazing

stuff!!!

 

9. The CDC of USA, the vaccine watchdog, has publicly admitted that its

much-publicized 2003 study denying any link between vaccines and autism,

is flawed. The Chief of CDC Dr Gerberding has confessed to the media

(CNN) that vaccines can cause " autism like symptoms " . The Autism

epidemicis found only in those countries that have allowed mass

vaccinations.

10. In the year 1999, the US Government instructed

vaccine manufacturers to remove mercury from vaccines " with immediate

effect " . But mercury

still remains a part of many vaccines.

11. " Mercury free " vaccines contain 0.05mcg of mercury, enough to permanently

damage a infant.

12.

IN INDIA NO ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO ENSURE THAT MERCURY AND OTHER

HEAVY METALS ARE REMOVED FROM VACCINES SIMPLY BECAUSE IT WOULD MAKE

VACCINES COSTLIER.

13. In a reply to then President Sri Abdul Kalam,

the Health Ministry informed, " mercury is required to make the vaccines

safe " . To the authors query that " what are these vaccines that it

requires the second most dangerous neurotoxin, mercury, to make them

safe? " , there was no reply.

14. Mercury used in vaccines is

second in toxicity only to the radioactive substance, Uranium. It is a

neurotoxin that can damage the entire nervous system of the infant in

no time.

15. Mercury accumulates in fat. The brain being made

entirely of fat cells, most of the mercury accumulates there giving

rise to the peculiar symptoms of the autistic children.

16.

The mercury used in vaccines is ethyl mercury. According to Indian

doctors this is 1000 times more toxic than the usual methyl mercury.

17. The aluminum present in vaccines makes the mercury, in any form, 100 times

more toxic.

18.

As per an independent study aluminum and formaldehyde present in

vaccines can increase the toxicity of mercury, in any form, by 1000

times.

19.

As per a Tehelka article on Autism, children are receiving 250 times

more mercury through vaccines than they can possibly tolerate. The

same

article states that if one considers the WHO limit for mercury in

water, they are receiving 50,000 times the limit. The limits set,

incidentally, are for adults and not infants.

[Guest guest]

Well, I wish I had a succinct answer to that.  I really do - - BUT . . .

 

A short-term study will not reflect the entire scope of the issue.  A long-term

study will reflect side-effects that result over time, and mercury will indeed

damage body systems over time for some people.

 

And whatever studies there are, many have been studied, and they are either

misleading or skewed, in the opinion of many authorities on the subject.  What I

would personally like to see is a study proving vaccines are NOT harmful. 

Preferably, long-term.  The chief of the CDC admitted himself that " ooooops, " we

did something wrong.  If the big guy stands up and admits wrongdoing, that is a

bit scary to me.  How do we believe a person or entity that just admitted their

word cannot be depended upon?  If someone proves that mercury is harmless, I

will stick my arm out, I promise you that.  But chemically, it ain't gonna

happen.  So, I don't stick the 'ol arm out.

 

Don't get me wrong.  As a " for instance, " the polio epidemic of 1952 was

considered to be extremely serious.  But there were 58,000 cases in the U.S. 

Hey, I wouldn't want to be one of the 58,000.  But the population of the U.S.,

at that time, was 157-1/2 million.  It is now about 300 million.  That means

chances of getting things have DECREASED.  And in 1952, that was considered a

serious  " epidemic. "   So, it is what I said before.  Comparing the amount of

people who will be affected to the entire population, nevermind the world

population (just talking the U.S. here), it can be considered statistically

miniscule, depending on your own opinion.  However, IMHO, the recommendations of

mandatory inoculation are over-kill.  That's all I'm saying.

 

Now, if I had been alive in 1952, and I was of semi-adult reasoning capability,

I would have probably considered the chances and outcome of " possibly " being

infected.  Okay, of the 58,000 reported cases, 3,000 died.  A life is a life, I

understand that, it goes without saying.  Not even one should be lost; I

wouldn't want it to be my child, absolutely not.  But in that case, I

(personally) would not be horribly concerned that statistical odds were in favor

of myself or my child dying.  I might self-educate and consider the possible

effects of the vaccine as a whole, against the possible effects of polio. 

However, on the other hand, 21,000 were left with mild or disabling paralysis. 

IMHO, 21,000 as compared to the U.S. population at that time is still,

statistically-speaking, a small percentage.  I personally think if mandatory

inoculation was recommended, it should have been MOST recommended for

areas where outbreaks were more

prevalent, such as large cities.  And leave it up to the person, not " let's all

be inoculated because we are ALL going to get it. "   Untrue.  And if a person

wants to be inoculated, let them.  All I am stressing is SELF-EDUCATION.  If a

person doesn't want to educate themselves as to the risks or the statistics, and

wants to take a chance of mercury side-effects, so be it.  That is their right. 

But I personally think if you are going to do it, just educate yourself first. 

That is my biggest point.  There is a fact on that list about mercury-free

vaccines.  They use the word " free, " but they are not free of harm, either.  I

am not saying " let's all get polio " in 1952.  If I had a child at that time, I

MIGHT have done it out of fear of POSSIBLE consequences.  But media is very

hyped on these subjects, and if I had indeed done it, it might have been because

the actual risk was EXAGGERATED.

 

I am not saying vaccines are bad.  I am saying the crap they PUT IN THEM are

bad.  If they take the crap out, let's all get in line.  I would be first in

line, believe me.  But I am not in line, and my GP asks me every single time I

come in to get a flu shot (which also has mercury), and every single time, I say

I would rather get sick.  I will take a chance of getting sick, rather than take

a chance of mercury side-effects because I personally think the chances of

having permanent damage from the flu virus is less.  If ebola was floating

around, I might study the statistics and change my mind.  It all depends.

 

The quote you included in your post is at least partially true, Pepper.  I

personally think the story of Jonas Salk is a fascinating one.  We will never

know how many people didn't come down with polio.  And this is a free country,

that's the great thing about America.  If someone wants to make sure they don't

get it, the choice and the vaccine is accessible.

 

I am not trying to hog the board at all because usually I stay in the background

in groups.  Almost always.  I haven't posted a whole lot.  But if there is an

issue that I feel strongly about, I might come out of the woodwork.  I might.

 

I posted again because I wanted to give your quote and post a fair shot.  It is

true that vaccines were a massively great medical development.  Just take the

crap out of them and find another way to preserve them.  I won't get on why I

think they allow these substances in there, that is another post, and only my

opinion, anyway.  I have written enough on the subject, let's get back to

epilepsy now?  Stay then, Pepper, if the moderator decides you have the option -

- just talk about epilepsy, and use those good brains you have up there to share

what you've learned.  I imagine most of us will be open to reading what you have

to say.  Most of us have read your posts thusfar.  Just don't press buttons,

unless you like it that much.  Maybe instead, show you are a valuable member of

the group, and all will be forgotten in time.  I bet nearly everyone in this

group will give you a shot.  And if someone wants to tell me I am wrong, I don't

mind

being wrong about my opinions.  Maybe I am, after all, full of crap.  Maybe,

possibly, perhaps I don't know what the heck I am talking about.  It's just my

suggestion, that's all.  And we all know the saying about opinions.

 

Can we talk about epilepsy now?  Pleeeez?  :-/

 

Diane