Re: colloidal minerals DAVE

[Guest guest]

Dave

----- Original Message -----

From: " denise milfort " <mllebondgirl007@...>

<gallstones >

Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 10:53 PM

Subject: Re: colloidal minerals DAVE

>

>

>

> hi Dave,

> can you just plain right out recommend a brand of

> colloidal minerals that are worth the money?

> Or are you saying it's just plain better to eat or

> juice the vegetables. In the tape one of the

> arguments was that if the soil is mineral depleted

> than so are the vegetables.

He is absolutely correct about the soils. If a soil has been depleted, left

fallow for 13 years it is considered organic but still pretty much depleted.

It is going to depend most on the conditioning of the soils the crops are

grown on. Organic growers are quite conscious of this and the soils within

the " organic " realm are getting better and better. This is why I say it is

mostly common sense which we have been educated away from and need to sit

back and observe from a common sense viewpoint. It is far better to get

our nutrition in the form the human organism spent millions of years

developing into through the divine process of evolution (assuming the soils

are nutrient rich. Hence cultures that irrigate with glacial milt). If you

eat a Payday bar the body does not say " uh oh, here comes a payday bar I

need to make some insulin. " It Says, " Uh oh, here comes a peck of apples, I

need to make a #*%! of insulin. " . Same goes for supplements; They are hard

on the mucousa, liver, etc. no matter how well made.

Grow organic, buy organic, eat organic. We should never have started trying

to warp and control the natural process at our level of science. This is

like milling out 100 plus nutrients from flour and then mandating the

" enrichment " of seven of those, and then calling the job done.

In terms of colloidal mineral supplements on the market, they just are not

what they are cracked up to be. Many are extremely high in aluminum and/or

salt, none have an appreciable amount of the trace elements, and most are

way out of balance in what they contain. Are they a Higher quality of

mineral bonding than lab made? Yes, but you just are not going to get what

you need out of them.

Mineral bonding is critically important. It has to do with the

strength of the valent bonding of the mineral (positively charged) and the

acid (negatively charged) portion. Strong enough to get through the stomach

acids, yet weak enough to be cleaved at the " cellular " level. Citrates,

malates, orotates, amino acid chelates, in the lighter minerals, the bonding

in the heavier minerals becomes even more important but individually

specific and too long a discussion for here. I can not recommend a

particular brand; suffice to say that you need to find a lab you trust, and

stick with their higher priced products (even the good labs make garbage

cheap in order to compete in the marketplace). Seeing a professional that

uses some type of non protocol based evaluation method is ultimately a good

idea.

>

[Guest guest]

Dave,

I agree with you on the organic eating, though I don't

practice it faithfully. But it is disheartening to me

when I hear reports here and there that they are

lowering the standard on what " organic " is. But I

supposed that food is better than some.

=====

L. Meydrech, CN

http://nutritionist.bravehost.com

" A cheerful heart is good medicine " Prov. 17:22a

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

That's great the twitching stopped. Mine stopped right away too after

taking magnesium. I finished that bottle and have never taken it again

and still don't have twitching. None if the rest of my symptoms would

abate so easily ....

>I want to also add that today is the first day my

>eyes didn't twitch and I didn't have the pulsing thing

>my muscles have been prone to lately.

[Guest guest]

----- Original Message -----

From: " Meydrech, CN " <journey2health@...>

<gallstones >

Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:55 PM

Subject: Re: colloidal minerals DAVE

> Dave,

>

> I agree with you on the organic eating, though I don't

> practice it faithfully. But it is disheartening to me

> when I hear reports here and there that they are

> lowering the standard on what " organic " is. But I

> supposed that food is better than some.

Yes, it is a shame but the economic interests of major players is and always

has swayed the hands of government regulation. If only we had a system with

our best interests at heart.

Do as I say not as I do, I too don't practice it faithfully. But the

most important thing is that we seek and understand, then make our own

decisions right or wrong. The goal of all organic is an unattainable ideal

we should strive for, and feel guiltless when we inevitably fall short.

Thanks . Always, in all ways, -Dave

>

>

>

>

> =====

> L. Meydrech, CN

> http://nutritionist.bravehost.com

>

>

> " A cheerful heart is good medicine " Prov. 17:22a

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> __________________________________________________

>