Guest guest Posted January 31, 2005 Report Share Posted January 31, 2005 Blood test should have also noted a change in the cell counts and that would have been a warning sign to a doctor of something happening other than just gallstones. http://www.healthscout.com/ency/68/28/main.html If you are familiar with two people having the same condition of cancer and they lived in the same general area it would behoove a quest into seeing if there is an environment condition of which may be a root cause to the disease's forthcoming and just how prevelent it may be in that area for a certain type of cancer. How do you think they figured out that asbestos would be a root cause of lung cancer? Dale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2005 Report Share Posted January 31, 2005 ----- Original Message ----- From: " Dale " <Da_@...> <gallstones > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 9:06 AM Subject: Re: Re: I'm new here, may have a Gall Bladder problem > If you are familiar with two people having the same condition of cancer > and they lived in the same general area it would behoove a quest into > seeing if there is an environment condition of which may be a root cause > to the disease's forthcoming and just how prevelent it may be in that area > for a certain type of cancer. How do you think they figured out that > asbestos would be a root cause of lung cancer? > > Dale Yeah, or diet and lifestyle! -Dave > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2005 Report Share Posted January 31, 2005 ----- Original Message ----- From: " Norton " <sn11386@...> <gallstones > Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 11:50 AM Subject: Re: I'm new here, may have a Gall Bladder problem > > Dear Will, > > My Grandmother just passed away from Gallbladder > cancer 3 months ago. My mom's friend mother just > passed away 3 months ago too from gallbladder cancer > and she was doing the cleanseing stuff, but because > she was doing that it caused her It didn't cause her anything... she decided. to wait 3 years to > get her gallbladder out and when they took it out they > found that she had cancer growing in it, but because > she waited there was nothing they could do for her. And what could they have done for her if she had not? What is the mean life expectancy of gallbladder cancer for someone her age? Was it even gallbladder cancer or a metastases from somewhere else? If she had (?) been cleansing for three years then she at the least was in a pre neoplastic situation when she had whatever incident that prompted her to start cleansing. Those with gallstones are at higher risk of gallbladder cancer. However those that retain their gallbladder have a lower risk of other cancers. If you cut your gallbladder out you cannot get gallbladder cancer. Of course if you cut off your breasts you can't get breast cancer either (some people do... preventatively!). You by the way are far more likely to " get " breast cancer statistically. Come to think of it, we can survive without our colons, we could wear a bag instead and suffer through the inconvenience and then we could not get colon cancer (third largest killer in America) either, could we? While there are many types of cancer, the cellular dysfunctions are similar, they are different tissue types that go whacko (presenting different treatment issues). Saving your gallbladder and going the " natural " route offers no guarantees. Just a better chance at a " quality life. > > I'm glad that you like the herb stuff and cleanseing, Hey, lets see a show of hands. How many of you out there are doing it this way because you like this herb stuff and cleansing? Or is it as I assume, that you would like to retain an important organ and feel that this avenue offers a better chance at length and quality of life? > but sometimes it is a good idea to just get it out. True, but rarely. > Hospitals are not scary, You are far braver than I. as long as you take > precautions What precautions? and ask lots of questions. They can't give me an educated answer to the questions I ask. As of '93 Out of 126 medical schools in the country only 3 had any kind of required nutritional course to get a degree. We put the medical establishment in the position of expert on health both culturally and legally when they have no training in it. They are schooled in sick, and then myopically so. > > I think that she () should at least go get a ultra sound. I agree emphatically. And X-RAYS and radiation dosge does not cause breast cancer. Pardon me- BULLSHIT! > > Norton > > > > > > Learn more from our experience, over 7.000 liver flush stories: > http://curezone.com/forums/fd50.asp?f=4 > http://curezone.com/forums/fd50.asp?f=80 > http://curezone.com/forums/fd50.asp?f=100 > http://curezone.com/forums/fd50.asp?f=112 > > Liver Cleanse Recipe: http://CureZone.com/cleanse/liver/ > > Liver Flush FAQ: http://curezone.com/forums/f.asp?f=73 > > Images: > http://CureZone.com/image_gallery/cleanse_flush/ > http://CureZone.com/image_gallery/intrahepatic_stones/ > > To unsubscribe, send blank e-mail to: > gallstones-unsubscribe and then reply to confirmation > message! > > To Post message: gallstones > Subscribe: gallstones-subscribe > > Web Sites for more information: > http://CureZone.org > http://www.liverdoctor.com/ > http://www.sensiblehealth.com/ > http://www.cyberpog.com/health/index.htm > http://www.relfe.com/gall_stone_cleanse.html > http://www.cleansingorsurgery.com/ > > Group page: gallstones > > To change your subscription to digest send blank e-mail to: > gallstones-digest > To change your subscription to NO-MAIL send blank e-mail to: > gallstones-nomail > To change your subscription to NORMAL send blank e-mail to: > gallstones-normal > You are receiving this email because you elected to subscribe to the > Gallstones group on 's groups. By joining the list you agree to hold > yourself FULLY responsible FOR yourself! > Have a nice day ! > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2005 Report Share Posted February 1, 2005 Do Xrays cause cancer? A question debated here recently. The US government seems to think so. Updated: 12:29 AM EST Hepatitis Viruses, Grilling Added to Cancer Causers List By DARLENE SUPERVILLE, AP (http://ar.atwola.com/link/93179288/html?badsc=B0ahTAbnfVvWY48JMG-BXspuMOtC_KwUd\ 2E0F243_RvJfrLEfYkifAc6KG5EqyBZSiCxTyeTeaeE64ptDgpfXR-x3gRASH_uCQBikONxd7fm P9JX-_NmvrIA$$) (http://ar.atwola.com/link/93179288/813975883/aoladp?target=_blank & border=0) WASHINGTON (Jan. 31) - The government is adding viruses for the first time to its list of known or suspected causes of cancer, including hepatitis B and C and a third virus that causes sexually transmitted diseases. Lead, X-rays and compounds in grilled meats also are joining the list. It has been known that the hepatitis viruses can cause liver cancer and that some forms of the sexually transmitted human papillomavirus can cause cervical cancer. But they were added to the list Monday only after officials decided to go beyond the report's historical focus on the occupational and environmental causes of cancer, said Dr. Portier, associate director of the National Toxicology Program, which prepared the latest update. " We felt (the report) needed to be expanded to include other things in our general environment that can cause cancer,'' Portier said. Dr. Thun, who runs the American Cancer Society's epidemiological program, said adding the viruses was important. " These are human carcinogens and very important carcinogens,'' he said. The list, which now identifies 246 known or suspected cancer-causing agents, is intended to give people who may or may not be exposed to any of the substances something to think about, he said. Take X-rays, added to the " known'' category. " This is simply to remind them that when they are making a decision about an X-ray to think about it and talk it over with your physician,'' Portier said. But the American College of Radiology faulted the addition of X-rays and gamma rays, saying it was misleading and could prompt patients to avoid getting needed care. " X-rays and gamma rays are not substances that the general public has access or exposure to and do not belong on a list of substances that pose a risk to people in the course of their normal, daily lives,'' Dr. Borgstede, chairman of the radiology college's board of chancellors, said in a statement. New to the suspected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.