Guest guest Posted October 20, 2001 Report Share Posted October 20, 2001 yes, rash came after fever broke her appetite is still small, but she is eating and drinking and playing so I'm not worried Kathy Re: measles > did the rash only come after the fever broke? That has been my experience > with Roseola. 2 kids, and 5 years in a daycare center and that's the > typical pattern that I saw. I also noticed with the boys (as the kids in > daycare were home for a few days), that about day 3 of the rash, it started > to lighten up and within a week - 10 days (the boys are 8 and 11 its' hard > to remember that far back) it was gone. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 20, 2001 Report Share Posted October 20, 2001 Mon - fever Tues day - not herself - grumpy, whiny, fever Tues dinner - would not eat, went to bed at 5:30; woke up at 6:30 vomitting; sick again at 9pm and again at 11pm Wed - fever, small apetite, notice a little rash in evening, starting on face (left cheek) Thurs - no fever, rash more prominent; after evening bath rash allover trunk, arms, legs Fri - am rash gone down; bath and rash again; same thing after evening bath - more rash Sat - rash this morning looks like faded red spots allover trunk, arms, legs, and left cheek; will try a bath shortly when the rash gets worse, the spots are very red and raised she didn't seem to have any symptoms of measles, and I looked at pictures of roseola and measles and it looks more like roseola I have given her vit c (sod.asc.), chlorophyll, and echinacea. Nothing else. Kathy > At 09:11 PM 10/19/2001 -0400, you wrote: > >the rash is worse today! looks like roseola > >haven't gone to the doctor, will wait and see > >Kathy > > > > > > I don't remember reading a description of the rash. > Can you describe the chain of events from when your child first got sick > (or anything that preceded getting sick) > all symptoms and order etc > -------------------------------------------------------- > Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 20, 2001 Report Share Posted October 20, 2001 I stopped taking temps because it can be too scary. I just watch their demeanor. I almost took her to the doctor, but couldn't get through when I called. Kathy From: <colinsapmama@...> > When my son had roseola, it started as a really high fever and then when the > fever broke, he had the rash. The rash was totally gone within three days. > Good luck, trying to figure out what it is, I know that it can be > frustrating. When Colin first had his fever, it was so high that I took him > into Urgent Care (this was befoe I " knew " better) and they just automatically > assumed that it was strep and an ear infection, so of course they prescribed > antibiotics. I took him to his regular ped and she said that it was just the > roseola and the only thing that I could do was to keep him comfortable! > Sara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2001 Report Share Posted December 9, 2001 THEY ALWAYS suggest Vaccination... LOL! Yes, it would be nice if they told WHY they think this... did they change the vaccine or something ? The MMR wasn't used until well after 1963 - so ?? What is their point? Stacey > CONCLUSIONS: Infants whose mothers were born after 1963 are more susceptible > to measles than are infants of older mothers. An increasing proportion of > infants born in the United States may be susceptible to measles. Infants at > high risk of exposure to measles should be vaccinated at 12 months of age. > Vaccination programs that reduce transmission of the measles virus in the > general population reduce the risk of infant exposure to measles. > > (SO This means my baby is at higher risk and they are suggesting vaccination > RIGHT?) > Amy OHIO > > AMY > MOMMY TO 4 KIDDIES > Chelsea 9 > Carrigian 5 > 4 > Chaela 10 mo > from the mouth of a 4 yr old > " your not fat mommy just squishy! " !!!! ) > <A HREF= " http://hometown.aol.com/chevy974/myhomepagebaby.html " >The Haskett bunch</A> > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2001 Report Share Posted December 9, 2001 I had to take my son to the ER (he's 15) when he was assaulted by another kid and ended up with 2 black eyes. First thing the doctor asked was When was your last tetanus shot? It didn't even register until later, then I thought about going back and educating her on how you get tetanus. Sherri Re: MEASLES THEY ALWAYS suggest Vaccination... LOL! Yes, it would be nice if they told WHY they think this... did they change the vaccine or something ? The MMR wasn't used until well after 1963 - so ?? What is their point? Stacey > CONCLUSIONS: Infants whose mothers were born after 1963 are more susceptible > to measles than are infants of older mothers. An increasing proportion of > infants born in the United States may be susceptible to measles. Infants at > high risk of exposure to measles should be vaccinated at 12 months of age. > Vaccination programs that reduce transmission of the measles virus in the > general population reduce the risk of infant exposure to measles. > > (SO This means my baby is at higher risk and they are suggesting vaccination > RIGHT?) > Amy OHIO > > AMY > MOMMY TO 4 KIDDIES > Chelsea 9 > Carrigian 5 > 4 > Chaela 10 mo > from the mouth of a 4 yr old > " your not fat mommy just squishy! " !!!! ) > <A HREF= " http://hometown.aol.com/chevy974/myhomepagebaby.html " >The Haskett bunch</A> > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 10, 2001 Report Share Posted December 10, 2001 The reason, for those who do not know this already, that 1963 is the year after which infants are more susceptible, is that is when measles vaccine was introduced. Because of the vaccine, infants are NOW susceptible, when they didn't used to be (due to maternal antibodies, which were passed on by those moms who had had natural measles). What it all boils down to is they are now recommending vaccinations because vaccination has made infants vulnerable. Hmmmm - anyone bothered by this picture? For those who have not already done so, please read my testimony to the Institute of Medicine (http://www.vaccinationnews.com/Authors/SandyMintz/IOMTest1993.htm). Sandy from Alaska http://www.vaccinationnews.com ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER. MEASLES CONCLUSIONS: Infants whose mothers were born after 1963 are more susceptible to measles than are infants of older mothers. An increasing proportion of infants born in the United States may be susceptible to measles. Infants at high risk of exposure to measles should be vaccinated at 12 months of age. Vaccination programs that reduce transmission of the measles virus in the general population reduce the risk of infant exposure to measles. (SO This means my baby is at higher risk and they are suggesting vaccination RIGHT?) Amy OHIO AMY MOMMY TO 4 KIDDIES Chelsea 9 Carrigian 5 4 Chaela 10 mo from the mouth of a 4 yr old " your not fat mommy just squishy! " !!!! ) <A HREF= " http://hometown.aol.com/chevy974/myhomepagebaby.html " >The Haskett bunch</A> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2002 Report Share Posted February 1, 2002 There is a measles 'outbreak' somewhere in London. As of now, 3 cases confirmed, 22 pending. A friend of mine said she heard the affected kids are unvaxxed.....hhmmmm. Haven't caught it on the news yet to see what panic they are trying to spread..........anyone know anymore? Suzanne dd Ruby 2.7yrs South Wales Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2002 Report Share Posted February 1, 2002 Hi Suzanne, I think you must have posted before you collected. I posted a link on INP about this an hour or so ago... Love, light and peace, Sue > Re: Measles > > > There is a measles 'outbreak' somewhere in London. As of now, 3 > cases confirmed, 22 pending. A friend of mine said she heard the > affected kids are unvaxxed.....hhmmmm. > Haven't caught it on the news yet to see what panic they are > trying to spread..........anyone know anymore? > > Suzanne > dd Ruby 2.7yrs > South Wales > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2002 Report Share Posted February 1, 2002 I had measles as a kid and so did many of the kids in the class. I never made world headlines nor did any of my classmates. Re: Measles There is a measles 'outbreak' somewhere in London. As of now, 3 cases confirmed, 22 pending. A friend of mine said she heard the affected kids are unvaxxed.....hhmmmm. Haven't caught it on the news yet to see what panic they are trying to spread..........anyone know anymore? Suzanne dd Ruby 2.7yrs South Wales Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2002 Report Share Posted February 1, 2002 Those of us who were young when measles was a normal part of life didn't really think much of it. All I remember is being able to be in my parents bed in the dark. It was a treat for me to get to be there. And you knew to stay in the dark (now it would seem to be because of vitamin A deficiencies). Now they compare measles in developed nations to that in developing. HOWEVER, it is true that the death rate from measles has risen since vaccination began, because now the high risk groups get it, infants and adults, instead of children, which is the grooup which can safely get it. Sandy from Alaska http://www.vaccinationnews.com http://www.whale.to/vaccines.html http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm http://www.909shot.com http://www.thinktwice.com http://www.mercola.com http://www.redflagsweekly.com ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER. Re: Re: Measles I had measles as a kid and so did many of the kids in the class. I never made world headlines nor did any of my classmates. Re: Measles There is a measles 'outbreak' somewhere in London. As of now, 3 cases confirmed, 22 pending. A friend of mine said she heard the affected kids are unvaxxed.....hhmmmm. Haven't caught it on the news yet to see what panic they are trying to spread..........anyone know anymore? Suzanne dd Ruby 2.7yrs South Wales Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2002 Report Share Posted February 2, 2002 i couldn't find much on the net, and nothing was said in the news this morning. here is an article. http://uk.news./020201/140/crf7w.html it says that none of the kids had received the MMR, but didn't say anything about the single vaccines. claudia __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2002 Report Share Posted February 2, 2002 In a message dated 2/2/02 7:25:42 AM GTB Standard Time, sandym@... writes: << HOWEVER, it is true that the death rate from measles has risen since vaccination began, because now the high risk groups get it, infants and adults, instead of children, which is the grooup which can safely get it. >> Has anyone investigated the causes of measles death in Japan? From the mercola article: <<<< since they stoped the trivalent vaccine there have been 90 deaths from measles. http://www.mercola.com/2001/feb/21/mmr_ban_japan.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2002 Report Share Posted February 2, 2002 Yup Sue! Posted this straightaway....before I read any others,,,,,,LOL! Suzanne dd Ruby 2.7yrs South Wales Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2002 Report Share Posted February 2, 2002 Yeh ...some of the people I know that had measles as a child didn't make the headlines either......favouritism i call it! Hehehe. Laughing aside though, this will scare a lot of parents in the UK I expect. And it won't be reported without scaremongery (have I just invented a word?!) and half-truths. Shheeesh. I am not concerned about it. If Ruby gets measles, she will see our homeopath and he will help us with it. I have already had 2 friends ring me this morning though, asking questions about it....*sigh*. Suzanne dd Ruby 2.7yrs South Wales Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2002 Report Share Posted February 2, 2002 Yes, I too had measles as a child and suffered no ill effects. I have 21 month old who does not have a thymus. She has been suffering from respiratory infections since November and was in hospital for 2 days this week because she was so ill. Unfortunately she does not eat much at all and has lost 4lbs in weight. She is one of those children that if she did catch measles she would be very ill indeed. She is still breastfed although she has been off that also over the last 2 weeks but is now having small amounts again. I just hope that it is doing her some good. > I had measles as a kid and so did many of the kids in the class. I never made world headlines nor did any of my classmates. > > > > > Re: Measles > > > There is a measles 'outbreak' somewhere in London. As of now, 3 cases confirmed, 22 pending. A friend of mine said she heard the affected kids are unvaxxed.....hhmmmm. > Haven't caught it on the news yet to see what panic they are trying to spread..........anyone know anymore? > > Suzanne > dd Ruby 2.7yrs > South Wales > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2002 Report Share Posted February 2, 2002 At 02:15 PM 02/02/2002 -0000, you wrote: >Yes, I too had measles as a child and suffered no ill effects. I have >21 month old who does not have a thymus. She has been suffering from >respiratory infections since November and was in hospital for 2 days >this week because she was so ill. Unfortunately she does not eat much >at all and has lost 4lbs in weight. She is one of those children that >if she did catch measles she would be very ill indeed. She is still >breastfed although she has been off that also over the last 2 weeks >but is now having small amounts again. I just hope that it is doing >her some good. > I really encourage you to find a quality classical homeopath to assist you when or if your daughter is ill. This can certainly be EXTREMELY helpful, whether she has a thymus or not. Sheri -------------------------------------------------------- Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK $$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account vaccineinfo@... (go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail PO Box 1563 Nevada City CA 95959 530-740-0561 Voicemail in US http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION TO VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE. Well Within's Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin International Tours, Homestudy Courses, ANTHRAX & OTHER Vaccine Dangers Education, Homeopathic Education CEU's for nurses, Books & Multi-Pure Water Filters Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2002 Report Share Posted March 17, 2002 I had " roseola " as a child, too... about the same age, too, I think. Hmm.... My parents were sure to get all of the vaccinations on time but we went to a clinic because when I was younger they didn't have insurance. I think they just automatically assume you don't have something if you've been immunized for it. Since my parents had both had measles as a child, they wouldn't have caught it from me, anyway. Don't think my sister caught it, though. Isn't measles very contagious? - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2002 Report Share Posted March 17, 2002 > One that I believe that to be true for is measles - it was everywhere and then overnight, pretty much gone. However, that doesn't mean I think that makes it a good thing.....as most of you know.< Sandy, My daughter who is 24 now received the MMR or measles vaccine at 15 months. At age 6 she had a severe case of the measles. I assure you the doctor didn't report that case. A grandmother posted that her autistic grandchild broke out in a rash soon after receiving the MMR, one in which she, an RN and the other grandmother, an RN, recognized as measles. But the doctor said it was roseola. This caught my attention because my grandson also broke out in a rash, as well as being very ill, shortly after his MMR. The doctor said it was roseola! My point is that it is likely the true number of measles cases isn't being reported, or is being called something else. Carlson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2002 Report Share Posted March 17, 2002 Perhaps I overstated my case, but that's why I said it was " pretty much gone " . It is also occurring in atypical ways, as well as mild or subclinical cases. But it is not occurring the way it used to, believe me. It was a normal part of childhood. Since it is still circulating, those whose vaccine-induced " immunity " has waned enough for a full-blown case, will show symptoms of one sort or another. I completely agree with you that it is going unrecognized, renamed and/or unreported, though, at least to some extent. Same with whooping cough, same with polio. Sandy http://www.vaccinationnews.com http://www.whale.to http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm http://www.909shot.com http://www.redflagsweekly.com http://www.thinktwice.com http://www.mercola.com Re:measles > One that I believe that to be true for is measles - it was everywhere and then overnight, pretty much gone. However, that doesn't mean I think that makes it a good thing.....as most of you know.< Sandy, My daughter who is 24 now received the MMR or measles vaccine at 15 months. At age 6 she had a severe case of the measles. I assure you the doctor didn't report that case. A grandmother posted that her autistic grandchild broke out in a rash soon after receiving the MMR, one in which she, an RN and the other grandmother, an RN, recognized as measles. But the doctor said it was roseola. This caught my attention because my grandson also broke out in a rash, as well as being very ill, shortly after his MMR. The doctor said it was roseola! My point is that it is likely the true number of measles cases isn't being reported, or is being called something else. Carlson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2002 Report Share Posted April 4, 2002 Antipyretics are drugs used to lower fever such as Tylenol and the million other brands. Fever is generally something we need to learn to leave alone. A doctor on the Vaccinations List put it very well " The body is not suicidal " . I love that. If you study Pasteur and Bechamp, one of the things you will learn is that germs don't come from without but rather within the body itself. If you ever have a properly done throat culture, you will be shocked at the germs that the body lives in perfect harmony with UNTIL the body for whatever reason becomes susceptible. By the way, diphtheria is common in throat cultures of healthy people (has to be a special culture though). Here is information from a 20-year medical researcher - . Please read all of it, you will be most enlightened and you will find reference to chickenpox and necrotising fasciitis or what I like to call the " eat you up " bug. QUOTE PARACETAMOL. (USA TYLENOL,IBUPROFEN etc) Your child is scratchy, your child has a temperature, your child is irritable, and you ring the doctor's surgery, and the voice on the other end says what it always says " " Just give Pamol, dear, and come back tomorrow if you are still worried. What is the purpose of fever? What do parents believe about fever? Should it be treated with antipyretics? Why do doctors prescribe antipyretics? What does the medical literature say about the biological impact of paracetamol? Antipyretics are also recommended prior to vaccination, though in this country, this advice is given hesitantly, since there is debate that antipyretics could " conceal " medically significant symptoms, and confuse diagnosis. EXTRACTS FROM MEDICAL LITERATURE: " Not all fevers need to be treated but many physicians do so to relieve parental concern. " (Eur J Ped 1994 Jun; 153 (6): 394-402) " An elevation in temperature following bacterial infection results in a significant increase in host survival " (Science 1975 Apr 11; 188 (4184): 166- " Many components of the nonspecific host defence response to infection such as leukocyte mobility, lymphocyte transformation, and the effects of interferon, appear to be enhanced by elevations in temperature that simulate moderate fevers. In addition, some evidence indicates that a fever in conjunction with the changes in plasma iron levels known to occur during infections is a synergistic host defence response. " (Pediatrics 1980, No: 66 (5) : 720 - 723) " Parental fever phobia and its correlates...surprising, higher socioeconomic status was not associated with a lesser degree of fever phobia...undue fear and overly aggressive treatment of fever are epidemic among parents of infants and young children, even among the highly educated and well-to-do. considerable effort will be required on the part of pediatricians and other child health workers to reeducate that parents about the definition, consequences and appropriate treatment of fever. " (Pediatrics 1985 June;75 (6) 1110-1113) " There is no convincing evidence that naturally occuring fevers are harmful. In contrast, animal studies have shown that fever helps animals to survive and infection whereas antipyretic increases mortality. Moreover there is considerable in vitro evidence that a variety of human immunological defences function better at febrile temperatures than at normal one. " (The Lancet, Volume 337, March 9, 1991) " Many cytokines are endogenous mediators of fever including interleukin (IL) -, 1 beta, IL-6 and others. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha may be both an endogenous pyrogen and an endogenous antipyretic or cryogen. " (Neuroimmunomodulation 1995 Jul-Aug; 2 (4):216-223) " There is overwhelming evidence in favor of fever being an adaptive host response to infection... as such, it is probable that the use of antipyretic/anti-inflammatory/analgesic drugs, when they lead to suppression of the fever, result in increased morbidity and mortality during most infections; this morbidity and mortality may not be apparent to most health care workers... " Infect Dis Clin North Am 1996 Mar;10(1) : 1-20.) Acetaminophen can induce pneumonia...'These finding suggest that allergic mechanism was involved in the pathogenesis of the pneumonitis. Underlying immunological disorders may have enhanced the occurrence. " Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Sasshi 1997 Sep; 35 (9) 974-9) There are other reports of this as well... " The results suggest that lung disease (rheumatoid lung) associated with collagen vascular diseases may be exacerbated by drug-induced (acetaminophen) pneumonitis. " Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Sasshi 1997 Oct; 35 (10) 1113-111 " Despite our lack of knowledge about its therapeutic mechanism, it has been claimed to be a safe drug, especially for children... paracetamol syrup (presumably for children) is extensively prescribed in large volumes...There is mounting evidence that paracetamol is not the benign drug that it was formally thought to be... We would question the whole rationale of prescribing the drug in near epidemic proportions. If it is to be used as a placebo, then it is a very dangerous placebo... The whole place of paracetamol prescribing for children has been questioned. While there is little concern about its use in the short term as an analgesic, there is considerable controversy over its use as an antipyretic....there is little evidence to support the use of paracetamol to treat fever in patients without heart or lung disease. Paracetamol may decreast antibody response to infection and increase morbidity and mortality in severe infections...too many parents and health workers think that fever is bad and needs to be suppressed by paracetamol when, indeed, moderate fever may improve the immune response...the use of paracetamol in children with acute infection did not result in an improvement in mood, comfort, appetite or fluid intake. " (Family Practice, Volume 13, No 2, 1996 pgs 179 - 181) " Fever is rarely harmful. Only extremely high fevers of 42.2C or 108 F or higher have been known to cause brain damage. Only fevers of 40.5C or 105F and higher need immediate attention, mainly because they are a clue that a serious infection could be present " (such as meningitis) (Sunday Star Times, May 3, 1998, C3) doctor's column. " Paracetamol has no antipyretic benefits over mechanical antipyreses alone in ...malaria. Moreover, paracetamol prolongs parasite clearance time, possible by decreased production of TNF and oxygen radicals. " (Lancet 1997;350:704-709) " The data suggest that frequent administration of antipyretics to children with infectious disease may lead to a worsening of their illness. " (Acta Paed. Jpn 1994 Aug;36 (4) 375-37 " Fever is an important indicator of disease and should not be routinely suppressed by antipyretics...fever may actually benefit the host defense mechanism...fever is short-lived and causes only minor discomfort...routine antipyretic therapy should be avoided and may be necessary in individual patients with cardiovascular or neurologic disorders. " (Infect Dis Clin North Am 1996 Mar;10 (1) 211-216) " Studies of bacterial and viral-infected animals have shown that moderate fevers decrease morbidity and increase survival rate " (Yale J Biol Med 1986 Mar-April; 59 (2) : 89-95) " Antipyretic drugs are effective in diminishing fever, but have significant side effects and may suppress signs of ongoing infections " (Arch Intern Med 1990, Aug; 150 ( : 1589-1597) MENINGOCOCCAL Disease: " use of analgesics were associated with disease...analgesic use was defined as analgesics taken in the past 2 weeks, excluding, for cases, those taken for identified early symptoms of meningococcal disease. These analgesics were predominantly acetaminophen products......because analgesics showed a stronger relationship with meningococcal disease, the use of analgesics may be a better measure of more severe illness than reported individual symptoms....we cannot exclude the possibility that acetaminophen use itself is a risk factor for meningococcal disease " (Ped Infec Dis, Oct 2000, Vol 19, No 10, 983-990) " Antipyretics prolong illness in patients with Influenza A.... The duration of illness was significantly prolonged from 5 days(without) to 8 1/2 days (with). Pharmacotherapy 2000, 20: 417-422) Take two aspirin, prolong the flu - 2 January 2001 Anne Burke, HealthScout Reporter (also reported by Reuters medical news...) " Taking aspirin or Tylenol for the flu actually prolongs the illness by up to 3 1/2 days, say researchers at the University of land. That is because fever may be the body's natural way of fighting an infection and taking aspirin or acetaminophen - the generic name for products such as Tylenol - may interefere with the process. " You are messing with Mother Nature, " Says Dr Leland Rickman, an associate clinical professor of medicine at the University of California San Diego. " An elevated temperature may actually help the body fight the infection quicker or better than if you don't have a fever. " " Whatever you do, don't give aspirin or Tylenol to children who have the flu or any other viral illness " , Rickman said " These results suggest that the systematic suppression of fever may not be useful in patients without severe cranial trauma or significant hypoxemia. Letting fever take its natural course does not seem to harm patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome, or influence the discomfort level AND MAY SAVE COSTS. " (wow!!!) (Arch Intern Med 2001, Jan 8; 161 (1) 121-123) Chickenpox treated with Tylenol/Ibuprofen provokes bacterial skin infections into fulminant necrotising fasciitis (Pediatr I(Pediatrics Vol 103, No 4, April 1999, 783-784 and 785-790) (Infect Med1999 16 (5):307) Just two of many references for antipyretic induced complications of chickenpox. (In MMWR - May 15, 1998, Vol 47 No 18. All cases of Varicella related deaths were treated with antipyretics. No causal association was investigated or ascribed. The " solution " to the problem was considered to be mandatory vaccination.) What you do as a parent, is your choice. Make sure that it is an " informed " choice. Get the articles referenced, do a med-line search - retrieve any others. REad the whole articles. Give them to your doctor to read, and discuss them with him/her. Most importantly, if you feel your child has an immunodeficiency, get your child tested so that you know what you are dealing with. How a child handles any infectious disease is dependant upon the immune system inherited, nutritional status, life-style, environment and resultant stresses and how the child reacts to them. The choice is yours. END QUOTE In a message dated 4/3/2002 7:55:37 PM Central Standard Time, larana@... writes: > what are antipyretics?? I thought the flesh eating virus was caused by a > strep virus, like strep throat that gets into an open sore causing havoc?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2002 Report Share Posted November 7, 2002 At 06:25 PM 11/07/2002 -0000, you wrote: >me neither I never saw measles in my life, is the vaccination >responsible for the rarity of measles? if so, aren't they affective? >I never saw adults with measles... In my opinion from my homeopathic perspective. People are being given the vaccine and they are sensitized - they basically have a chronic case of measles. They can't get an acute, normal case, because they have a chronic case. The vaccine goes around and around in the blood wreaking havoc. That is why children aren' getting measles. Instead they are getting autoimmune disease, autism, asthma, allergies, diabetes and MORE. > >so the same with rubella and mumps same thing > >as the mainstreamers say? these germs are out there even if the kids >are vaccinates, so can these diseases be caught and have natural >immunity accuired? Yes, the still can be gotten and natural immunity acquired. The are a vital part of our immune system development and THEY have messed with the fabric of life that has developed over thousands of years. Our relationship with these viruses. Sheri -------------------------------------------------------- Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK $$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account vaccineinfo@... voicemail US 530-740-0561 (go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm Homeopathy course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION TO VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE. Well Within's Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin International Tours, Homestudy Courses, ANTHRAX & OTHER Vaccine Dangers Education, Homeopathic Education CEU's for nurses, Books & Multi-Pure Water Filters Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 8, 2002 Report Share Posted November 8, 2002 Even from a non-homeopathic perspective...... http://www.vaccinationnews.com/scandals/may%5F31%5F02/scandal18.htm Sandy from Alaska http://www.vaccinationnews.com http://www.vaccinationnews.com/Scandals/past_scandals.htm http://www.whale.to http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm http://www.909shot.com http://www.redflagsweekly.com http://home.san.rr.com/via/ http://www.vaccine-info.com http://healing-arts.org/children/vaccines/ ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER. IN ADDITION, THE FACT THAT THIS EMAIL HAS BEEN FORWARDED IN NO WAY NECESSARILY IMPLIES ENDORSEMENT OF THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE AUTHOR OR AUTHORS OF THE ARTICLE OR EMAIL. Re: Measles At 06:25 PM 11/07/2002 -0000, you wrote: >me neither I never saw measles in my life, is the vaccination >responsible for the rarity of measles? if so, aren't they affective? >I never saw adults with measles... In my opinion from my homeopathic perspective. People are being given the vaccine and they are sensitized - they basically have a chronic case of measles. They can't get an acute, normal case, because they have a chronic case. The vaccine goes around and around in the blood wreaking havoc. That is why children aren' getting measles. Instead they are getting autoimmune disease, autism, asthma, allergies, diabetes and MORE. > >so the same with rubella and mumps same thing > >as the mainstreamers say? these germs are out there even if the kids >are vaccinates, so can these diseases be caught and have natural >immunity accuired? Yes, the still can be gotten and natural immunity acquired. The are a vital part of our immune system development and THEY have messed with the fabric of life that has developed over thousands of years. Our relationship with these viruses. Sheri -------------------------------------------------------- Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK $$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account vaccineinfo@... voicemail US 530-740-0561 (go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm Homeopathy course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION TO VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE. Well Within's Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin International Tours, Homestudy Courses, ANTHRAX & OTHER Vaccine Dangers Education, Homeopathic Education CEU's for nurses, Books & Multi-Pure Water Filters Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 5, 2003 Report Share Posted August 5, 2003 Hi Sinead, I am a mother of 3 boys, and I have experienced this. It is actually called ROSEOLA, and sometimes referred to as " infant measles " ...although it really is not measles. It is a virus, and the rash should pass quickly. My (former) pediatrician tried to tell me it was scarlet fever, which is caused by strep, even after the lab work came up negative. But, that's another story! Hope your little one is feeling better already! Carolyn P Dayton, OH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 5, 2003 Report Share Posted August 5, 2003 My son had this when he was 13 months old. He vomited several times, and had a fever of 105. When the fever broke, he had a rash on his trunk. That was it! Very scary while it lasted, but he came through with flying colors, and our daughter, who was 2 didn't " catch " it from him. Kay **************** Well, first she puked, then she got a fever which lasted 3-4 days and then went right down and a rash on her trunk came out. I was frantic and called NHS Line etc etc and they were useless diagnosing meningitus and I was sure it wasn't that. Isn't that the first thing everyone checks for anyway? So I was trawling on the net and found baby measles - basically it fits the exact symptons and is considered the mildest form of measles and afflicts babies aged 6mos-2 yrs. I will look on the net for some info but just wondered if any of you experienced mothers out there could advise me.... Thanks Sinead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2004 Report Share Posted January 29, 2004 Well it is stories like this that make the worries real. Amy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.