Cancer-enabling enzyme is electrically unbalanced

[Guest guest]

The current theory we have been running into when we see a cancer

remission using our devices is that of enzyme inactivation.

Like inactivation of a germ, enzyme inactivation stops short of

destruction, and instead runs interference at the molecular level.

We bombard an enzyme with dc current and it alters something.

Cancer cells contain a huge amount (abnormal amount) of ribonucleic

reductase. This enzyme, in large amounts, leads to rapid cellular

division and growth of tumors. Normal cells contain thousands of

time less of the enzyme, and are not as aggressively multiplying as

are cancer cells.

This enzyme (call it RR) has an extra electron on one end of each

molecule. This electron may be the target we are hitting with dc

current. If we remove this electron, the RR may not be able to do

its job. Many cancer cells will stop reproducing so fast and the

immune system may be able to spot and remove them efficiently once

their numbers are static or reduced.

How much dc current do we need in order to inactivate RR? We don't

know, however it does appear from the GEIPE site that it's pretty

low, certainly a safe amount.

Does this mean we have cancer licked? Hardly. But it offers some

hope of a path to find out the effectiveness and to research it

further based on a soundly-reasoned hypothesis.

I am hoping we can at least slow down tumors. We have so far removed

a liver cancer, basal cell carcinoma, and lymphoma. That would alert

me if I had cancer that this stuff is worth a try!

IT ALSO MEANS YOU DON'T QUIT YOUR MEDICAL TREATMENTS! This method of

ours is no subsitute, but may be an awesome combination therapy if it

gets full testing and passes. Meanwhile we have to test without

jeopardizing anyone's standard treatments. There have been cases

where people abandoned their doctor thinking they had beaten it, and

found it was still there worse than ever, and lost valuable time or

their lives because they failed to take competent medical advice in

favor of what sounded good.

I will say I was very surprised to hear about RR and electricity.

Chemo treatments, at least some of them, aim to defeat RR and rapidly

growing cells like hair fall out on chemo.

The electricity offers targetted attack on RR only in the tumor, with

very little collateral damage to healthy cells, since their levels of

RR are so low that it is unlikely to remove it all. It is likely to

reduce RR to acceptable levels in the cancer cells and cut down their

reproductive rates, I think. I am just a layman, not a doc or other

expert.

I am setting out here to research germs, not cancer, but if it is

easy to do and harmless (if) as well as effective in some cases, it's

certainly a worthwhile enterprise, and I will not veto messages about

using this on cancer.

bG