Guest guest Posted December 16, 2008 Report Share Posted December 16, 2008 nope, not an issue. a thin film of water is too narrow to pass much current along. it will dive into the underlying artery just fine even if skin is wet or you stand on your head and bow three times to Chicago..nothing will stop it. bG > > Is it very important to keep the skin between the two electrodes dry when using the device? I have gotten the impression that if there is moisture between the two then the current may just pass over the surface of the skin and not electrify the blood. If it is important, then how is dryness best accomplished? I personally get good results with dampness on the whole inside of the wrist, but any improvement in technique is welcome. tia pj > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2008 Report Share Posted December 16, 2008 Hi baby_grand, thats true unless they are using Salt water for a wrist electrode then it just shorts out the electrodes, try it yourself, you wont feel anything if there is salt water on the skin between the two electrodes because almost none of it will go into the tissue. Salt water is a good conductor. Take care, V > nope, not an issue. a thin film of water is too narrow to pass much > current along. it will dive into the underlying artery just fine even > if skin is wet or you stand on your head and bow three times to > Chicago..nothing will stop it. > bG > >> Is it very important to keep the skin between the two electrodes > dry when using the device? I have gotten the impression that if there > is moisture between the two then the current may just pass over the > surface of the skin and not electrify the blood. If it is important, > then how is dryness best accomplished? I personally get good results > with dampness on the whole inside of the wrist, but any improvement in > technique is welcome. tia pj -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2008 Report Share Posted December 16, 2008 That sounds about right, V, thanks bG > > >> Is it very important to keep the skin between the two electrodes > > dry when using the device? I have gotten the impression that if there > > is moisture between the two then the current may just pass over the > > surface of the skin and not electrify the blood. If it is important, > > then how is dryness best accomplished? I personally get good results > > with dampness on the whole inside of the wrist, but any improvement in > > technique is welcome. tia pj > > > > > > -- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 Hi, I have some technical questions. I'm sure there are many readers here who have had similar, so I apologise in advance for any repetition. Dr.Beck's Sota wrist device he states is powered by a 9 volt battery stepped up to 27 volts output to allow current to get into the blood rather than just the skin. The range is supposedly 50-100 micro-amperes. I'm not electronically practiced beyond the simple basics and I can't figure out how a 4.5V apparatus can achieve the same effect. I'm not suggesting anything to the contrary however, and I am simply trying to interpret the data as I understand it. If I=V/R and R is the skin/body resistance doesn't that mean using 4.5V (for the wrist device) as opposed to 27V output will result in 7 times less available current output: and how will this still reach the blood rather than just the skin - assuming this is indeed required - and is the device therefore as effective? http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-234247273689402090 (details on amperage at the 15min mark) I know practitioners here have had good results using bG's blood electrifier as worn on the wrist. I do not doubt it - I am using it. But I am wondering why? What am I missing that can explain the effect of two different electronically designed devices? I just don't understand the electronics well enough or perhaps I'd build the Beck unit from his schematics myself (if that is the preferred method). Otherwise, maybe invest in a ready-made...? From the Protocol website there appear to be two devices commercially available, one being the Sota device: http://www.thewolfeclinic.com/sota/index.html and the other:Altered States. http://altered-states.net/index2.htm?/healing/combination.htm And for those who compute these things, one more question. Electronically, is there any advantage of any one unit over the other? Kind Regards, tcc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 the beck devices all have internal fixed and adjustable resistors to reduce the voltage. the reason 27 or 36 volts in some models is used is to operate the switching mechanism, not to apply that to the body. people who write about these devices always get it wrong. all you would have to do is take 3 9 volt batteries in series and apply to the wrist as I have, to know it is not really 27 they are using, nowhere near it. (do not do this, I got 3rd degree burns that way almost into the artery itself). bG > > Hi, > > I have some technical questions. I'm sure there are many readers here > who have had similar, so I apologise in advance for any repetition. > > Dr.Beck's Sota wrist device he states is powered by a 9 volt battery > stepped up to 27 volts output to allow current to get into the blood > rather than just the skin. The range is supposedly 50-100 micro- amperes. > > I'm not electronically practiced beyond the simple basics and I can't > figure out how a 4.5V apparatus can achieve the same effect. I'm not > suggesting anything to the contrary however, and I am simply trying to > interpret the data as I understand it. > > If I=V/R and R is the skin/body resistance doesn't that mean using > 4.5V (for the wrist device) as opposed to 27V output will result in 7 > times less available current output: and how will this still reach the > blood rather than just the skin - assuming this is indeed required - > and is the device therefore as effective? > > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-234247273689402090 > (details on amperage at the 15min mark) > > I know practitioners here have had good results using bG's blood > electrifier as worn on the wrist. I do not doubt it - I am using it. > But I am wondering why? What am I missing that can explain the effect > of two different electronically designed devices? > > I just don't understand the electronics well enough or perhaps I'd > build the Beck unit from his schematics myself (if that is the > preferred method). Otherwise, maybe invest in a ready-made...? > > From the Protocol website there appear to be two devices commercially > available, one being the Sota device: > http://www.thewolfeclinic.com/sota/index.html > > and the other:Altered States. > http://altered-states.net/index2.htm?/healing/combination.htm > > And for those who compute these things, one more question. > Electronically, is there any advantage of any one unit over the other? > > > Kind Regards, > > tcc > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Hello! I hope it's OK to resurrect a thread. Seems as though my question might best be posed here. I am also only basically electronically inclined and am not attempting to dispute anyone's conclusions; just looking for some clarification. Beck's original device pulses the blood at around 4hz while the wrist electrifier constructed with AA batteries appears to apply a steady current. I was under the impression that the 4hz pulsing action of the blood electrifier was part of blood electrification's therapeutic value. Am I mistaken on this? Thanks for your time! jk > > > > Hi, > > > > I have some technical questions. I'm sure there are many readers > here > > who have had similar, so I apologise in advance for any repetition. > > > > Dr.Beck's Sota wrist device he states is powered by a 9 volt battery > > stepped up to 27 volts output to allow current to get into the blood > > rather than just the skin. The range is supposedly 50-100 micro- > amperes. > > > > I'm not electronically practiced beyond the simple basics and I > can't > > figure out how a 4.5V apparatus can achieve the same effect. I'm not > > suggesting anything to the contrary however, and I am simply trying > to > > interpret the data as I understand it. > > > > If I=V/R and R is the skin/body resistance doesn't that mean using > > 4.5V (for the wrist device) as opposed to 27V output will result in > 7 > > times less available current output: and how will this still reach > the > > blood rather than just the skin - assuming this is indeed required - > > and is the device therefore as effective? > > > > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-234247273689402090 > > (details on amperage at the 15min mark) > > > > I know practitioners here have had good results using bG's blood > > electrifier as worn on the wrist. I do not doubt it - I am using it. > > But I am wondering why? What am I missing that can explain the > effect > > of two different electronically designed devices? > > > > I just don't understand the electronics well enough or perhaps I'd > > build the Beck unit from his schematics myself (if that is the > > preferred method). Otherwise, maybe invest in a ready-made...? > > > > From the Protocol website there appear to be two devices > commercially > > available, one being the Sota device: > > http://www.thewolfeclinic.com/sota/index.html > > > > and the other:Altered States. > > http://altered-states.net/index2.htm?/healing/combination.htm > > > > And for those who compute these things, one more question. > > Electronically, is there any advantage of any one unit over the > other? > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > tcc > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 steady current work best and more consistantly...30 seconds to 3 minutes before reversing polarity. In a message dated 30-07-09 4:56:00 AM GMT Daylight Time, no_reply writes: Hello! I hope it's OK to resurrect a thread. Seems as though my question might best be posed here. I am also only basically electronically inclined and am not attempting to dispute anyone's conclusions; just looking for some clarification. Beck's original device pulses the blood at around 4hz while the wrist electrifier constructed with AA batteries appears to apply a steady current. I was under the impression that the 4hz pulsing action of the blood electrifier was part of blood electrification'Beck's original device pulses the blood at Thanks for your time! jk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 after studying this it seems to me the best way to use blood electrification would be to apply to the chest area by being between a sandwich of wet towels/sponges in front and back of the chest down to the last rib. swine flu kills due to resperitory failure/pnueomonia of the chest area and the lungs. using the (2 x 1.5 VOLTS AA) batteries and reversing the polarity every 3 minutes would be optimum.you can use a cheap meter to monitor the currrent flow.adjusting the wetness of the towels or how hard they press against you can adjust the current flow. use it for up to 15 to 20 minutes 3 times a day until the flu is gone. here is a picture of a very simple blood electrification device using sponges. health.dir.groups.health.dirhe here is some peer reviewed related research papers too. __http://www.papimi.http:_ (http://www.papimi.gr.._/) (_http://www.papimi.http:_ (http://www.papimi.gr../) ) . in my opinion it seems to work by micro electrolysis of tissue/blood/in my fluids which creates a hostile environment for pathogens. micro electrolysis may also occur on the pathogens. micro electrolysis may create a non stable ion filled environment for the pathogen to which they can not adapt as the electrolysis would would create non predictable changes to that environment at the microscopic level. electrolysis is used to sterilize water.for example the MIOX Disinfection Pen used by campers/hikers/Pen used by campers/hikers/<WBR>army uses a very passing a current for a minute through it.look it up in google. __http://www.bushwalkhttp://www.ht_ (http://www.bushwalking.org.au.._/) (_http://www.bushwalkhttp://www.ht_ (http://www.bushwalking.org.au../) ) . could anyone who uses this for swine flu report back to help others? What does bg think of this prtocol.Could you give your input or modify the above? Thanks. In a message dated 30-07-09 5:08:42 AM GMT Daylight Time, no_reply writes: it is a fine, on topic question. the use of 4 hertz by beck (and he said frequency is not critical) was to help insure two things: reversal of current reduces electrolysis or chemical changes due to electricity in the skin, and second, by staying to a low frequency instead of higher hertz, you help to insure no possible heart interference. the heart would be sensitive to 60 hertz for instance, but not to 4 hertz. still it's not advised to use above the waist if pacemaker, or unhealthy heart. There's no therapeutic value to 4 hertz, in fact it's less powerful than straight dc. but to get 4 hertz you have to have a device. beck's first devices were slower than 4 hertz, reversing current about every 2 seconds or so. the problem with 4 hertz (nothing is perfect) is the jarring effects of the spikes of current. the user experiences discomfort and turns it down. also the current going back and forth tends to negate the buildup of charge on microbes. so it is debatable if you lose or gain by using 4 hertz vs dc. dc can be dangerous if used too long in one direction, causes sore joints we have found. so we reverse it manually by switching pads positions every 5-10 minutes or so. My own auto-unit has both 4 hertz and 1/60 hertz to reverse it every 30 seconds or so. the use of square wave was to ensure the current is fully " on " in both directions as long as possible. a sine wave has the current rising and falling more gradually so that the current is rarely at the top or bottom of the curve, and it reduces the power too much. so he chose a square wave. that causes a spike and is uncomfortable, so my design uses a ceramic disk capacitor across the output leads to dampen the square wave spike. it's all interesting but not much to do with the effect on the germs. the biggest thing is just knowing a germ is there, finding it, and putting electrodes on each side of it to pass some current through it. people wanting more than that are not really infected (infected people really know it and get right to work). I have lots of folks here hoping for " better health " and this is good if that includes a real infection. too many times people believe for one reason or another, they are infected, when they aren't. that's when the discussion livens up about frequencies and such. they know it does nothing for them except some vague effect and want to modify it and try again. most people have no use for beck or this thing unless something crops up on the skin, etc and then they can knock it out with this or beck's either one, but use beck's electrifier directly on the skin where the germ is, and it should then work. bG > > Hello! > > I hope it's OK to resurrect a thread. Seems as though my question might best be posed here. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 it is a fine, on topic question. the use of 4 hertz by beck (and he said frequency is not critical) was to help insure two things: reversal of current reduces electrolysis or chemical changes due to electricity in the skin, and second, by staying to a low frequency instead of higher hertz, you help to insure no possible heart interference. the heart would be sensitive to 60 hertz for instance, but not to 4 hertz. still it's not advised to use above the waist if pacemaker, or unhealthy heart. There's no therapeutic value to 4 hertz, in fact it's less powerful than straight dc. but to get 4 hertz you have to have a device. beck's first devices were slower than 4 hertz, reversing current about every 2 seconds or so. the problem with 4 hertz (nothing is perfect) is the jarring effects of the spikes of current. the user experiences discomfort and turns it down. also the current going back and forth tends to negate the buildup of charge on microbes. so it is debatable if you lose or gain by using 4 hertz vs dc. dc can be dangerous if used too long in one direction, causes sore joints we have found. so we reverse it manually by switching pads positions every 5-10 minutes or so. My own auto-unit has both 4 hertz and 1/60 hertz to reverse it every 30 seconds or so. the use of square wave was to ensure the current is fully " on " in both directions as long as possible. a sine wave has the current rising and falling more gradually so that the current is rarely at the top or bottom of the curve, and it reduces the power too much. so he chose a square wave. that causes a spike and is uncomfortable, so my design uses a ceramic disk capacitor across the output leads to dampen the square wave spike. it's all interesting but not much to do with the effect on the germs. the biggest thing is just knowing a germ is there, finding it, and putting electrodes on each side of it to pass some current through it. people wanting more than that are not really infected (infected people really know it and get right to work). I have lots of folks here hoping for " better health " and this is good if that includes a real infection. too many times people believe for one reason or another, they are infected, when they aren't. that's when the discussion livens up about frequencies and such. they know it does nothing for them except some vague effect and want to modify it and try again. most people have no use for beck or this thing unless something crops up on the skin, etc and then they can knock it out with this or beck's either one, but use beck's electrifier directly on the skin where the germ is, and it should then work. bG > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have some technical questions. I'm sure there are many readers > > here > > > who have had similar, so I apologise in advance for any repetition. > > > > > > Dr.Beck's Sota wrist device he states is powered by a 9 volt battery > > > stepped up to 27 volts output to allow current to get into the blood > > > rather than just the skin. The range is supposedly 50-100 micro- > > amperes. > > > > > > I'm not electronically practiced beyond the simple basics and I > > can't > > > figure out how a 4.5V apparatus can achieve the same effect. I'm not > > > suggesting anything to the contrary however, and I am simply trying > > to > > > interpret the data as I understand it. > > > > > > If I=V/R and R is the skin/body resistance doesn't that mean using > > > 4.5V (for the wrist device) as opposed to 27V output will result in > > 7 > > > times less available current output: and how will this still reach > > the > > > blood rather than just the skin - assuming this is indeed required - > > > and is the device therefore as effective? > > > > > > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-234247273689402090 > > > (details on amperage at the 15min mark) > > > > > > I know practitioners here have had good results using bG's blood > > > electrifier as worn on the wrist. I do not doubt it - I am using it. > > > But I am wondering why? What am I missing that can explain the > > effect > > > of two different electronically designed devices? > > > > > > I just don't understand the electronics well enough or perhaps I'd > > > build the Beck unit from his schematics myself (if that is the > > > preferred method). Otherwise, maybe invest in a ready-made...? > > > > > > From the Protocol website there appear to be two devices > > commercially > > > available, one being the Sota device: > > > http://www.thewolfeclinic.com/sota/index.html > > > > > > and the other:Altered States. > > > http://altered-states.net/index2.htm?/healing/combination.htm > > > > > > And for those who compute these things, one more question. > > > Electronically, is there any advantage of any one unit over the > > other? > > > > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > > > tcc > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2009 Report Share Posted July 30, 2009 Bg, you are great and doing the VERY good work, and i just wanted to remind everybody on the list of that. There are also others who act as mentors on this list, like , Dick, and im sorry to not have gathered a list of the top 10 heavies, but you know who you are, so mucho kudos to them as well. And the reporters too, yay! Its got to be an effort in which you constantly have to defend your truth and understand that 1]financial reward will [er, probably,] never be forthcoming [oops, sorry if broke this news too crudely] and that 2] you will be lucky not to get rubbed out. The reward is to survive and stay well, and esp to be empowered with the means to help others do the same. Sorry for the waxing, this is a pretty dry crew, i know. Anyway, many very sincere thanks to all of you. cindolo ps my teeth are still ok, ive been using the zapper guy's 3 frequ zapper with the copper handhelds. In the mouth area. Ive been too cheap to buy a wire stripper for the 4 aaa godzilla, and too blind to strip that little wire that comes out of the battery holder... > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have some technical questions. I'm sure there are many readers > > > here > > > > who have had similar, so I apologise in advance for any repetition. > > > > > > > > Dr.Beck's Sota wrist device he states is powered by a 9 volt battery > > > > stepped up to 27 volts output to allow current to get into the blood > > > > rather than just the skin. The range is supposedly 50-100 micro- > > > amperes. > > > > > > > > I'm not electronically practiced beyond the simple basics and I > > > can't > > > > figure out how a 4.5V apparatus can achieve the same effect. I'm not > > > > suggesting anything to the contrary however, and I am simply trying > > > to > > > > interpret the data as I understand it. > > > > > > > > If I=V/R and R is the skin/body resistance doesn't that mean using > > > > 4.5V (for the wrist device) as opposed to 27V output will result in > > > 7 > > > > times less available current output: and how will this still reach > > > the > > > > blood rather than just the skin - assuming this is indeed required - > > > > and is the device therefore as effective? > > > > > > > > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-234247273689402090 > > > > (details on amperage at the 15min mark) > > > > > > > > I know practitioners here have had good results using bG's blood > > > > electrifier as worn on the wrist. I do not doubt it - I am using it. > > > > But I am wondering why? What am I missing that can explain the > > > effect > > > > of two different electronically designed devices? > > > > > > > > I just don't understand the electronics well enough or perhaps I'd > > > > build the Beck unit from his schematics myself (if that is the > > > > preferred method). Otherwise, maybe invest in a ready-made...? > > > > > > > > From the Protocol website there appear to be two devices > > > commercially > > > > available, one being the Sota device: > > > > http://www.thewolfeclinic.com/sota/index.html > > > > > > > > and the other:Altered States. > > > > http://altered-states.net/index2.htm?/healing/combination.htm > > > > > > > > And for those who compute these things, one more question. > > > > Electronically, is there any advantage of any one unit over the > > > other? > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > > > > > tcc > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2009 Report Share Posted July 30, 2009 this may/may not work. a lot of current goes around the area. GEIPE found this out when applying transdermal dc to cancer tumors like liver, etc. surface tumors worked deeper ones did not. my daughter uses two wrists, and this sends current into the bloodrich lungs. helps her lung infections clear right up, where in the past they took days on antibiotics, this works overnight, repeatably now for years. But who knows it could not hurt to try it, either. thanks kosmo. bG > > > > Hello! > > > > I hope it's OK to resurrect a thread. Seems as though my question might > best be posed here. > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2009 Report Share Posted July 30, 2009 When you say " uses two wrists " -- are you saying one sponge/pad on the left wrist and one on the right? MA ________________________________ From: baby_grand <no_reply > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 3:09:42 PM Subject: Re: wrist electrifier  this may/may not work. a lot of current goes around the area. GEIPE found this out when applying transdermal dc to cancer tumors like liver, etc. surface tumors worked deeper ones did not. my daughter uses two wrists, and this sends current into the bloodrich lungs. helps her lung infections clear right up, where in the past they took days on antibiotics, this works overnight, repeatably now for years. But who knows it could not hurt to try it, either. thanks kosmo. bG > > > > Hello! > > > > I hope it's OK to resurrect a thread. Seems as though my question might > best be posed here. > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2009 Report Share Posted July 30, 2009 yes, one goes on the pulse point of one wrist, the other goes on pulse point of other wrist. every 5-10 minutes change the pads to the opposite positions, left to right, right to left. do not use it this way if pacemaker, or bad heart (physically bad) bG > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > I hope it's OK to resurrect a thread. Seems as though my question might > > best be posed here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2009 Report Share Posted July 30, 2009 Thanks so much for the answer, Baby_Grand. I really appreciate it! You'll probably be hearing from me again in the weeks ahead! Thanks again, jk > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have some technical questions. I'm sure there are many readers > > > here > > > > who have had similar, so I apologise in advance for any repetition. > > > > > > > > Dr.Beck's Sota wrist device he states is powered by a 9 volt battery > > > > stepped up to 27 volts output to allow current to get into the blood > > > > rather than just the skin. The range is supposedly 50-100 micro- > > > amperes. > > > > > > > > I'm not electronically practiced beyond the simple basics and I > > > can't > > > > figure out how a 4.5V apparatus can achieve the same effect. I'm not > > > > suggesting anything to the contrary however, and I am simply trying > > > to > > > > interpret the data as I understand it. > > > > > > > > If I=V/R and R is the skin/body resistance doesn't that mean using > > > > 4.5V (for the wrist device) as opposed to 27V output will result in > > > 7 > > > > times less available current output: and how will this still reach > > > the > > > > blood rather than just the skin - assuming this is indeed required - > > > > and is the device therefore as effective? > > > > > > > > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-234247273689402090 > > > > (details on amperage at the 15min mark) > > > > > > > > I know practitioners here have had good results using bG's blood > > > > electrifier as worn on the wrist. I do not doubt it - I am using it. > > > > But I am wondering why? What am I missing that can explain the > > > effect > > > > of two different electronically designed devices? > > > > > > > > I just don't understand the electronics well enough or perhaps I'd > > > > build the Beck unit from his schematics myself (if that is the > > > > preferred method). Otherwise, maybe invest in a ready-made...? > > > > > > > > From the Protocol website there appear to be two devices > > > commercially > > > > available, one being the Sota device: > > > > http://www.thewolfeclinic.com/sota/index.html > > > > > > > > and the other:Altered States. > > > > http://altered-states.net/index2.htm?/healing/combination.htm > > > > > > > > And for those who compute these things, one more question. > > > > Electronically, is there any advantage of any one unit over the > > > other? > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > > > > > tcc > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2009 Report Share Posted July 30, 2009 Hmmmm -- my husband has a bad heart valve that he takes medication for, but I was hoping that zilling would help his lung problems. So -- probably not a good idea? MA ________________________________ From: baby_grand <no_reply > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 5:01:18 PM Subject: Re: wrist electrifier  yes, one goes on the pulse point of one wrist, the other goes on pulse point of other wrist. every 5-10 minutes change the pads to the opposite positions, left to right, right to left. do not use it this way if pacemaker, or bad heart (physically bad) bG > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > I hope it's OK to resurrect a thread. Seems as though my question might > > best be posed here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2009 Report Share Posted July 31, 2009 Dear bG, When you write that your daughter uses two wrists, are you referring to her using the GODZILLA? Thanks in advance for your reply. Margo > > my daughter uses two wrists, and this sends current into the bloodrich lungs. helps her lung infections clear right up, where in the past they took days on antibiotics, this works overnight, repeatably now for years. > > > > But who knows it could not hurt to try it, either. thanks kosmo. > > > > bG > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2009 Report Share Posted July 31, 2009 right. bG > > > > Dear bG, > > When you write that your daughter uses two wrists, are you referring to her using the GODZILLA? Thanks in advance for your reply. > > Margo > > > > > my daughter uses two wrists, and this sends current into the bloodrich lungs. helps her lung infections clear right up, where in the past they took days on antibiotics, this works overnight, repeatably now for years. > > > > > > But who knows it could not hurt to try it, either. thanks kosmo. > > > > > > bG > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Check this video by Dr. Glen A. Gordon who healed his heart with 2 Gauss micropulsing PMEF device: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5695988460216444662 here is a patent for this device, someone handy with electronics could make it.: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7175587.pdf There are few places on the net selling it. all the best. > > > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > I hope it's OK to resurrect a thread. Seems as though my question might > > > best be posed here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2011 Report Share Posted May 10, 2011 k, , I think I used Weldwood contact cement for mine. First wrapped them in cloth and thread, and stuck them to bottom about 1.5 " apart bG > > bG, Happy to be able to connect again! Please be assured that you are appreciated and I hope I can help spread the word without getting too many blank stares! I have put together a wrist electrifier but I need a cement which will hold the electrodes to the battery holder. You mentioned one that you use but I cannot find it here. Any other suggestions? Also, have you had any feedback about the pads being effective for digestive problems? Thanks, Bill > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2011 Report Share Posted May 10, 2011 Well, you certainly got some posts by scaring us to death, didn't you? Anyway, I knocked a cold sore (fever blister, Herpes Simplex, etc.) dead again. Just held the positive end of a AA cell against the spot with my wet finger on the back end for a few minutes. Did it a couple times yesterday and this morning it is 90% gone. This has worked for me numerous times if I start treating it as soon as I notice the feeling. If I wait, thinking it is something else, it takes longer to kill it, and may even become a runny sore, but even then it heals faster than if I used cold sore meds on it, or just let it go. MIght be 2 or 3 weeks with an ugly scab. Still think a website is a good idea, because people would find it even if they were not searching for anything having to do with microcurrent, or electricity, if you used the right keywords. Dick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2011 Report Share Posted May 10, 2011 Well, you certainly got some posts by scaring us to death, didn't you? Anyway, I knocked a cold sore (fever blister, Herpes Simplex, etc.) dead again. Just held the positive end of a AA cell against the spot with my wet finger on the back end for a few minutes. Did it a couple times yesterday and this morning it is 90% gone. This has worked for me numerous times if I start treating it as soon as I notice the feeling. If I wait, thinking it is something else, it takes longer to kill it, and may even become a runny sore, but even then it heals faster than if I used cold sore meds on it, or just let it go. MIght be 2 or 3 weeks with an ugly scab. Still think a website is a good idea, because people would find it even if they were not searching for anything having to do with microcurrent, or electricity, if you used the right keywords. Dick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 11, 2011 Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 bG, I read the digest every day, religiously. I post once a blue moon. You are doing immense good. I appreciate the time you put into the list and I admire your patience with the newbies. Keep on trucking! Namaste, Dean > > bG, Happy to be able to connect again! Please be assured that you are appreciated and I hope I can help spread the word without getting too many blank stares! I have put together a wrist electrifier but I need a cement which will hold the electrodes to the battery holder. You mentioned one that you use but I cannot find it here. Any other suggestions? Also, have you had any feedback about the pads being effective for digestive problems? Thanks, Bill > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 11, 2011 Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 bG, I read the digest every day, religiously. I post once a blue moon. You are doing immense good. I appreciate the time you put into the list and I admire your patience with the newbies. Keep on trucking! Namaste, Dean > > bG, Happy to be able to connect again! Please be assured that you are appreciated and I hope I can help spread the word without getting too many blank stares! I have put together a wrist electrifier but I need a cement which will hold the electrodes to the battery holder. You mentioned one that you use but I cannot find it here. Any other suggestions? Also, have you had any feedback about the pads being effective for digestive problems? Thanks, Bill > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 11, 2011 Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 Dick, Am in understanding you right? No electrodes, just plain batter? If so, i will carry a little one in my handbag. Thanks. > > Well, you certainly got some posts by scaring us to death, didn't you? > > Anyway, I knocked a cold sore (fever blister, Herpes Simplex, etc.) dead again. Just held the positive end of a AA cell against the spot with my wet finger on the back end for a few minutes. Did it a couple times yesterday and this morning it is 90% gone. > > This has worked for me numerous times if I start treating it as soon as I notice the feeling. If I wait, thinking it is something else, it takes longer to kill it, and may even become a runny sore, but even then it heals faster than if I used cold sore meds on it, or just let it go. MIght be 2 or 3 weeks with an ugly scab. > > Still think a website is a good idea, because people would find it even if they were not searching for anything having to do with microcurrent, or electricity, if you used the right keywords. > > Dick > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.