Re: Beck blood electrifyer -vs- Gozilla

[Guest guest]

Hi Luke here from Australia and studing energy medicine devises here in Asia

for my own personal health

investagation on a cellular level ...these other devises do you know what apere

they are running on as i have heard many scientific versions about

nano amperes

pico amperes

femto amperes

atto amperes 0.0000000000000000000000001

so anything that is a high amperes is dangerous for cell membranes

do you know this

cheers luke

Beck blood electrifyer -vs- Gozilla

Hello!

For a long time, I have thought of making a blood electrifyer

accorrding to Beck's plan (blood electrifyer device). This process is

quite complicated according to my level of electronics and it is also

quite expensive.

After having read a lot from different sources, I am asking myself the

next 2 questions:

1. Does the Gozialla device has the same use than the blood

electrifyer device?

2. Are the zones and frequencies are the same?

I will be waiting for your answers. Thanks.

Wemast

[Guest guest]

they are similar usage.

the godzilla can be used for blood electrifier, but you should

reverse the current every 5-10 minutes in order to avoid sore

fingers, we do not know what causes that.

godzilla is just a 6 volt battery and a piece of wire. It is

actually considered by many including me, to be more powerful than

beck's, but also requires you reverse the current by either switching

pads positions or using a switch. upto you. you will find godzilla

is a good first start to determine if anything can be done for you.

best,

bG

>

> Hello!

>

> For a long time, I have thought of making a blood electrifyer

> accorrding to Beck's plan (blood electrifyer device). This process

is

> quite complicated according to my level of electronics and it is

also

> quite expensive.

>

> After having read a lot from different sources, I am asking myself

the

> next 2 questions:

>

> 1. Does the Gozialla device has the same use than the blood

> electrifyer device?

> 2. Are the zones and frequencies are the same?

>

> I will be waiting for your answers. Thanks.

>

> Wemast

>

[Guest guest]

yes, we have the range pretty well-defined to remove microbes, that

is all we use it for, so we don't need a lot, usually .3mA DC is more

than enough for most local infections. a 3.5-6.0 volt battery is

usually about right, given the resistance of bodies. Varying it a

bit within that range seems to provide the effect without harm, at

least not in 7 years running now.

bG

>

> Hi Luke here from Australia and studing energy medicine devises

here in Asia for my own personal health

> investagation on a cellular level ...these other devises do you

know what apere they are running on as i have heard many scientific

versions about

> nano amperes

> pico amperes

> femto amperes

> atto amperes 0.0000000000000000000000001

>

> so anything that is a high amperes is dangerous for cell membranes

>

> do you know this

>

> cheers luke

>

>

>

> Beck blood electrifyer -vs- Gozilla

>

>

> Hello!

>

> For a long time, I have thought of making a blood electrifyer

> accorrding to Beck's plan (blood electrifyer device). This process

is

> quite complicated according to my level of electronics and it is

also

> quite expensive.

>

> After having read a lot from different sources, I am asking myself

the

> next 2 questions:

>

> 1. Does the Gozialla device has the same use than the blood

> electrifyer device?

> 2. Are the zones and frequencies are the same?

>

> I will be waiting for your answers. Thanks.

>

> Wemast

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi, Luke.

Current below 500uA (microamps) are suppose to increase production of

Adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP), which is a multifunctional nucleotide that is

most important as a " molecular currency " of intracellular energy transfer.[1] In

this role, ATP transports chemical energy within cells for metabolism. Current

above 500uA, we believe, is better for killing or disabling pathogens and

reducing pain.

So, it depends on whether you need to kill bugs and reduce pain or whether you

are more interested in healing. I have learned that I get best results by using

current above the 500uA for awhile and then after achieving the results I want,

switching to around 300uA for a longer period. Either will increase circulation,

which gets more oxygen to the area, and that is healthy.

JMHO, of course.

Dick

[Guest guest]

I've found that current around .2-.4 is ideal for pathogens such as

virus (colds) and some bacterials.

The best times of application for me, have been 10 minutes or so

every few hours for about 3 times. This gets any germs that were

forming during the application and are " adults " when the later

application is used. REally cleans house.

bG

>

> Hi, Luke.

>

> Current below 500uA (microamps) are suppose to increase production

of Adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP), which is a multifunctional

nucleotide that is most important as a " molecular currency " of

intracellular energy transfer.[1] In this role, ATP transports

chemical energy within cells for metabolism. Current above 500uA, we

believe, is better for killing or disabling pathogens and reducing

pain.

>

> So, it depends on whether you need to kill bugs and reduce pain or

whether you are more interested in healing. I have learned that I get

best results by using current above the 500uA for awhile and then

after achieving the results I want, switching to around 300uA for a

longer period. Either will increase circulation, which gets more

oxygen to the area, and that is healthy.

>

> JMHO, of course.

>

> Dick

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

no discussion of current would be complete without mentioning the

size of electrodes. with godzilla pads it will be higher total

current based on the larger sponges, with smaller ones the below

numbers are about right. enjoy

bG

> >

> > Hi, Luke.

> >

> > Current below 500uA (microamps) are suppose to increase

production

> of Adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP), which is a multifunctional

> nucleotide that is most important as a " molecular currency " of

> intracellular energy transfer.[1] In this role, ATP transports

> chemical energy within cells for metabolism. Current above 500uA,

we

> believe, is better for killing or disabling pathogens and reducing

> pain.

> >

> > So, it depends on whether you need to kill bugs and reduce pain

or

> whether you are more interested in healing. I have learned that I

get

> best results by using current above the 500uA for awhile and then

> after achieving the results I want, switching to around 300uA for a

> longer period. Either will increase circulation, which gets more

> oxygen to the area, and that is healthy.

> >

> > JMHO, of course.

> >

> > Dick

> >

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Re your statement:

" no discussion of current would be complete without mentioning the

size of electrodes "

Absolutely!  talking about the current without indicating the effective

contact area of the electrodes used provides little information, but

we see it done repeatedly . . . and you just did it again LOL  

 

But you, in this case, did at least give a general idea. And you did

indicate that larger pads would see larger currents.

From: baby_grand <no_reply >

Subject: Re: Beck blood electrifyer -vs- Gozilla

Date: Thursday, October 2, 2008, 1:50 PM

no discussion of current would be complete without mentioning the

size of electrodes. with godzilla pads it will be higher total

current based on the larger sponges, with smaller ones the below

numbers are about right. enjoy

bG

-

Visit Your Group | Terms of Use

| Unsubscribe Recent Activity 22New Members 1New Files

Visit Your Group HealthHeartburn or WorseWhat symptomsare most

serious?Meditation andLovingkindnessA Groupto share and learn.Drive

TrafficSponsored Searchcan help increaseyour site traffic..