Re: Micro Currents for Major Diseases

[Guest guest]

> Some studies shows that a range of 50-100 micro-amperes [uA] kills viruses in

test studies;,

--not quite right. the total current used was that level, but in a tiny vessel

smaller than a thimble. They were careful to say what the current density was,

but no one bothered to understand that, they simply quoted the total current

used.

you can not use that little current for 3-6 minutes as they did in their

mini-test tube, and expect much to happen in the human body.

bG

>

> Some studies shows that a range of 50-100 micro-amperes [uA] kills viruses in

test studies;, and other studies show the use of higher uA currents that has

been used between 300 to 700 uA for healing effects that has been shown to be

150% to 250% faster than normal treatments.

> Also that currents below 1000 uA shows up to 75% higher free amino acids and

up to 400% more available ATP. However, higher than 1000 uA showed depressed

levels of these substances, often less than non-treated cases.

> Low current 50-100 uA micro-amperes, kills the HIV and HCV pathogens, as as

noted within the info. within the help files, Pulsed current is superior to

direct current applications.

> ------------------

> With the above info.. I'd like to ask your opinion if you think this info. is

correct, and if not, what would the BEST uA be used for treating major diseases

with? [using the Godzillia of course.]

>

[Guest guest]

Now that makes a lot of sense, I'd never have thought of that.

When you say that using 20-30 min....is that because of not wanting to

accumulate too much die off at one time?

I remember seeing some post on here somewhere that some were using the Godzilla

for 4 hours a day etc.. or maybe that was for healing effects, don't

remember... Seems like more the better, but then..I also know that that is not

wise in some cases of treatments with other things, such as certain herbs etc..

Would appreciate your sharing your knowledge about this...

Many thanks! FP

> >

> > Some studies shows that a range of 50-100 micro-amperes [uA] kills viruses

in test studies;, and other studies show the use of higher uA currents that has

been used between 300 to 700 uA for healing effects that has been shown to be

150% to 250% faster than normal treatments.

> > Also that currents below 1000 uA shows up to 75% higher free amino acids

and up to 400% more available ATP. However, higher than 1000 uA showed depressed

levels of these substances, often less than non-treated cases.

> > Low current 50-100 uA micro-amperes, kills the HIV and HCV pathogens, as as

noted within the info. within the help files, Pulsed current is superior to

direct current applications.

> > ------------------

> > With the above info.. I'd like to ask your opinion if you think this info.

is correct, and if not, what would the BEST uA be used for treating major

diseases with? [using the Godzillia of course.]

> >

>

[Guest guest]

it's a feeling for the right moves based on the years here seeing what happens.

there could always be some better study of course.

But, in general, 20 minutes on colds, then wait some hours and 20 more, a few

times seems to do the trick without issues. Cold virus is hardy, so this should

be a good yardstick for other stuff.

In general, I follow a " use the least that gets a good effect " philosophy. More

is not always better.

The dieoffs are a consideration, also a person's tolerance for this. We just

don't have a full testing of it, so it's best to proceed carefully.

I don't think that hours with dc current or any current has any proven benefits,

or we would have heard about it, and it could have drawbacks or side effects,

but luckily those have not been heard about beyond some minor ones that went

right away.

The big risk is " feature creep " --people adding things to the design that alter

the behavior of the device into dangerous or ineffective ranges. No sooner do

you say 6 then someone uses 9 volts because the battery looks cuter, or use a

wall current converter instead of a battery. It goes on and on with bowls of

electric water, crystals glued onto the ends of the wires that make them not

conduct anything, zappers on the lower spine only to stimulate something or

other, 5000 dollar glowing purple glass tubes, ball lightning in old airplane

hangars, etc.

bG

> > >

> > > Some studies shows that a range of 50-100 micro-amperes [uA] kills

viruses in test studies;, and other studies show the use of higher uA currents

that has been used between 300 to 700 uA for healing effects that has been shown

to be 150% to 250% faster than normal treatments.

> > > Also that currents below 1000 uA shows up to 75% higher free amino acids

and up to 400% more available ATP. However, higher than 1000 uA showed depressed

levels of these substances, often less than non-treated cases.

> > > Low current 50-100 uA micro-amperes, kills the HIV and HCV pathogens, as

as noted within the info. within the help files, Pulsed current is superior to

direct current applications.

> > > ------------------

> > > With the above info.. I'd like to ask your opinion if you think this info.

is correct, and if not, what would the BEST uA be used for treating major

diseases with? [using the Godzillia of course.]

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Exactly correct. Kali et al were very careful with their units. Also

they usually said that the viruses were inactivated rather than killed.

There are those that say that a virus cannot be killed because they

are--by definition--not alive. But that is only because of our system

of definitions.

.. . . Not sure about my spelling of 'Kali' . . .

From: baby_grand <no_reply > Sent: Thu, February 3, 2011 7:47:11 PMSubject: Re: Micro Currents for Major Diseases

> Some studies shows that a range of 50-100 micro-amperes [uA] kills viruses in test studies;, --not quite right. the total current used was that level, but in a tiny vessel smaller than a thimble. They were careful to say what the current density was, but no one bothered to understand that, they simply quoted the total current used. you can not use that little current for 3-6 minutes as they did in their mini-test tube, and expect much to happen in the human body.bG>> Some studies shows that a range of 50-100 micro-amperes [uA] kills viruses in test studies;, and other studies show the use of higher uA currents that has been used between 300 to 700 uA

for healing effects that has been shown to be 150% to 250% faster than normal treatments. > Also that currents below 1000 uA shows up to 75% higher free amino acids and up to 400% more available ATP. However, higher than 1000 uA showed depressed levels of these substances, often less than non-treated cases. > Low current 50-100 uA micro-amperes, kills the HIV and HCV pathogens, as as noted within the info. within the help files, Pulsed current is superior to direct current applications. > ------------------> With the above info.. I'd like to ask your opinion if you think this info. is correct, and if not, what would the BEST uA be used for treating major diseases with? [using the Godzillia of course.]>

[Guest guest]

My medical friend says it is equally valid for a treatment to be viro-static, or

viro-cidal. Bacterio-static, or bacterio-cidal.

Equally valid, they both will do the job.

bG

> >

> > Some studies shows that a range of 50-100 micro-amperes [uA] kills viruses

in

> >test studies;, and other studies show the use of higher uA currents that has

> >been used between 300 to 700 uA for healing effects that has been shown to be

> >150% to 250% faster than normal treatments.

> >

> > Also that currents below 1000 uA shows up to 75% higher free amino acids and

up

> >to 400% more available ATP. However, higher than 1000 uA showed depressed

levels

> >of these substances, often less than non-treated cases.

> >

> > Low current 50-100 uA micro-amperes, kills the HIV and HCV pathogens, as as

> >noted within the info. within the help files, Pulsed current is superior to

> >direct current applications.

> >

> > ------------------

> > With the above info.. I'd like to ask your opinion if you think this info.

is

> >correct, and if not, what would the BEST uA be used for treating major

diseases

> >with? [using the Godzillia of course.]

> >

>

[Guest guest]

viruses seem to fall apart in smaller pieces

like bacteria when zeta potential is risen.

Can be also seen with Vitamin C that is

donating electrons like a current.

See Klenner:

http://www.orthomed.com/klenner.htm

Mononucleosis, Burkitt lymphoma, cancer of the bladder..

Kaali is correct.

Am 05.02.2011 00:59, schrieb Don Hildreth:

 

Exactly correct.  Kali et al were very careful with

their units.  Also

they usually said that the viruses were inactivated

rather than killed.

There are those that say that a virus cannot be

killed because they

are--by definition--not alive.  But that is only

because of our system

of definitions.

 

.. . . Not sure about my spelling of 'Kali' . . . 

[Guest guest]

Thanks-

From: Dr. Matthias Weisser <matthias.weisser@...> Sent: Fri, February 4, 2011 10:41:12 PMSubject: Re: Re: Micro Currents for Major Diseases

viruses seem to fall apart in smaller pieceslike bacteria when zeta potential is risen. Can be also seen with Vitamin C that isdonating electrons like a current. See Klenner:http://www.orthomed.com/klenner.htmMononucleosis, Burkitt lymphoma, cancer of the bladder..Kaali is correct. Am 05.02.2011 00:59, schrieb Don Hildreth:

Exactly correct. Kali et al were very careful with their units. Also

they usually said that the viruses were inactivated rather than killed.

There are those that say that a virus cannot be killed because they

are--by definition--not alive. But that is only because of our system

of definitions.

.. . . Not sure about my spelling of 'Kali' . . .

[Guest guest]

Thanks-

From: Dr. Matthias Weisser <matthias.weisser@...> Sent: Fri, February 4, 2011 10:41:12 PMSubject: Re: Re: Micro Currents for Major Diseases

viruses seem to fall apart in smaller pieceslike bacteria when zeta potential is risen. Can be also seen with Vitamin C that isdonating electrons like a current. See Klenner:http://www.orthomed.com/klenner.htmMononucleosis, Burkitt lymphoma, cancer of the bladder..Kaali is correct. Am 05.02.2011 00:59, schrieb Don Hildreth:

Exactly correct. Kali et al were very careful with their units. Also

they usually said that the viruses were inactivated rather than killed.

There are those that say that a virus cannot be killed because they

are--by definition--not alive. But that is only because of our system

of definitions.

.. . . Not sure about my spelling of 'Kali' . . .

[Guest guest]

Did you know that Dr. Klenner was "curing" polio in three days during the 50's, when there were many epidemics, with intravenous Vitamin C, and the medical profession totally ignored his reports? Also he was curing snake bites, tetanus, blood poison and many other infections and diseases with massive doses of intravenous Vitamin C.

There is a doctor now who is encapsulating vitamin C and other nutrients in lecithin so it is not neutralized by stomach acid, and goes into the small intestine where it is absorbed directly into the blood system to the organs needing it. It is claimed to be 500 times more effective than orally administered, and does not cause bowel intolerance. You can encapsulate Vitamin C and other nutrients yourself with granular lecithin and an ultrasonic jewelry cleaner. Instructions on line.

Google liposomal vitamin C if you are interested.

Dick

[Guest guest]

Did you know that Dr. Klenner was "curing" polio in three days during the 50's, when there were many epidemics, with intravenous Vitamin C, and the medical profession totally ignored his reports? Also he was curing snake bites, tetanus, blood poison and many other infections and diseases with massive doses of intravenous Vitamin C.

There is a doctor now who is encapsulating vitamin C and other nutrients in lecithin so it is not neutralized by stomach acid, and goes into the small intestine where it is absorbed directly into the blood system to the organs needing it. It is claimed to be 500 times more effective than orally administered, and does not cause bowel intolerance. You can encapsulate Vitamin C and other nutrients yourself with granular lecithin and an ultrasonic jewelry cleaner. Instructions on line.

Google liposomal vitamin C if you are interested.

Dick