Guest guest Posted February 3, 2011 Report Share Posted February 3, 2011 I've been reading everything I can dig up about what's been used and researched with micro current on major diseases. It seems this was also being used back in the mid-1800's and Ruth Brown has a couple books about it also, though I'm under the opinion that her personal " quirks " got in the way of sound research results using micro currents, thus she was proven to be a Quack with wild claims. Makes me wonder what is actually " Truth " about what is the best protocol to use today. Some studies shows that a range of 50-100 micro-amperes [uA] kills viruses in test studies;, and other studies show the use of higher uA currents that has been used between 300 to 700 uA for healing effects that has been shown to be 150% to 250% faster than normal treatments. Also that currents below 1000 uA shows up to 75% higher free amino acids and up to 400% more available ATP. However, higher than 1000 uA showed depressed levels of these substances, often less than non-treated cases. Low current 50-100 uA micro-amperes, kills the HIV and HCV pathogens, as as noted within the info. within the help files, Pulsed current is superior to direct current applications. ------------------ With the above info.. I'd like to ask your opinion if you think this info. is correct, and if not, what would the BEST uA be used for treating major diseases with? [using the Godzillia of course.] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.