Re: A few opinions needed

[Guest guest]

unless there's a proven diagnosed and specific germ threat, I would wonder if

this is wise. But whatever, you have to assess the risk of doing this vs the

benefit, and against doing something else or doing nothing. I doubt the

flushing of the germ toxins is that big a deal after a period of a few days of

dieoffs, and you can slow down to make it more tolerable, or even without

symptoms. I don't think this has any use as a general cleanup. I have done it

that way and beyond the first few days of dieoffs, there is little reward in it.

using on blood stream a few hours in a month can reduce prostate issues for me,

so that's good, but not worth doing it constantly.

bG

>

> Greetings all.

> The body has six times the kidney function it needs.

> Would there be a detriment to treating at any and all leisure times? Say ankle

to ankle for a session, ankle to knee for a session, jaw to jaw......you get the

idea. Often and several times a day. I would think that the kidneys, which I

assume are going to filter the dead germs, would be able to handle the excess

load, even if a person had minor renal problems.(I don't) I understand the idea

of diminishing returns, say 60 minutes is only twice as good as 15 minutes, but

if I wasn't doing anything else productive, I figure why not?

> Also, in treating for dental stuff, can you treat from upper jaw to lower jaw

instead of from jaw to wrist or jaw to base of skull? I figure a person would be

treating twice as much area in the same time.

> Am I missing anything? Thanks for your time. Jim

>

[Guest guest]

to me, there might be some benefit to very sparing usage once in awhile. some

germs in blood or tissue are not damaging, but present the immune system with

foreign things to remove, so are extra work. Some with cancer have seen

remissions by removing the baggage germs, so the immune system can use more of

its effect on the tumors, etc rather than wasting it on innocuous but foreign

things in the system. It can be overdone, but this type of thing is very

interesting and why we are here to find things out.

bG

> >

> > Greetings all.

> > The body has six times the kidney function it needs.

> > Would there be a detriment to treating at any and all leisure times? Say

ankle to ankle for a session, ankle to knee for a session, jaw to jaw......you

get the idea. Often and several times a day. I would think that the kidneys,

which I assume are going to filter the dead germs, would be able to handle the

excess load, even if a person had minor renal problems.(I don't) I understand

the idea of diminishing returns, say 60 minutes is only twice as good as 15

minutes, but if I wasn't doing anything else productive, I figure why not?

> > Also, in treating for dental stuff, can you treat from upper jaw to lower

jaw instead of from jaw to wrist or jaw to base of skull? I figure a person

would be treating twice as much area in the same time.

> > Am I missing anything? Thanks for your time. Jim

> >

>