Tumors and godzilla

[Guest guest]

This is from Germany, shows dramatic results in tumor reduction in rats. There

is currently a lot of use of this on people in China, as it is cheap and has a

very high success rate, much higher than traditional chemo-radiation methods.

There is an online supplier of home use, including the specially made needles.

It would probably be ok to use on tumors that can be felt and defined without an

ultrasound or other means. So have fun with it.

The way it works is to remove a single electron from the active enzyme that

makes cancer cells reproduce rapidly. This is the same thing chemo tries to do,

but this does it better, and without side effects (other than visions of being a

pin cushion).

This was pioneered by Bjorne Nordenstrom many years ago. Forrest sells

units for a modest price (much much lower than std treatments) for these. The

audience would likely be clinical people, but I guess your local acupuncturist

could give you a hand? If not then your local S & M group. (kidding of course).

Consult your doctor, or go to China. Or stay home, consult your doctor, eat

chocolate and read magazines while you stick electrified godzilla needles into

your tumors, and come out healthy while everyone else dies. Gotta love it.

bG

Bioelectromagnetics. 2000 Jul;21(5):395-401.

Experimental low-level direct current therapy in liver metastases: influence of

polarity and current dose.

Turler A, Schaefer H, Schaefer N, Wagner M, Maintz D, Qiao JC, Hoelscher AH.

Source

Department of Visceral- and Vascular Surgery, University of Cologne, Germany.

tuerler@...

Abstract

Several authors recently reported on the successful local treatment of malignant

disease with low-level direct current therapy. However, antitumoral effects in

colorectal metastases has not been investigated experimentally. The aim of the

present study was to assess the effectiveness of this therapy and the influence

of polarity and current dose. Colorectal metastases were established in BD IX

rats by the injection of colon cancer cells under the liver capsule. After three

weeks, the liver tumor volumes were determined by magnetic resonance imaging of

the liver. Low-level direct current therapy was applied via five platinum

electrodes. Four different applications were used: 60 C/cm(3), anode at the

center; 60 C/cm(3), cathode at the center; 80 C/cm(3), anode at the center; and

80 C/cm(3), cathode at the center. In the control group, five electrodes were

placed without applying any direct current. All animals were sacrificed on

postoperative day 7. Liver metastases were histologically examined for vital

tumor cells. Statistical analysis was performed with chi(2)-test. The mean

initial tumor diameter before treatment was 3.6 +/- 1.4 mm (volume: 25.2 +/- 9.7

mm(3)). Histological examination of the removed livers revealed significant

destruction of the metastases with localized necroses in all treatment groups;

37% had a complete response rate and 63% a partial response rate. There were no

significant necroses in the control group (P < 0.0001). The best treatment

results were obtained in the group with an anode at the center and a current

dose of 80 C/cm(3). Direct current therapy offers a new and safe method for the

local treatment of liver metastases. We were able to observe that tumor damage

is related to current dose but not to the polarity of the central electrode.

Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

[Guest guest]

Can you clarify these 2 sentences? They seem contradictory, first suggesting

which should be the anode, then saying polarity does not matter. Either way it

sounds like our home-made gadgets might be very helpful!

Holly

" The best treatment results were obtained in the group with an anode at the

center and a current dose of 80 C/cm(3). .. We were able to observe that tumor

damage is related to current dose but not to the polarity of the central

electrode. "

>

> This is from Germany, shows dramatic results in tumor reduction in rats.

There is currently a lot of use of this on people in China, as it is cheap and

has a very high success rate, much higher than traditional chemo-radiation

methods.

>

> There is an online supplier of home use, including the specially made needles.

It would probably be ok to use on tumors that can be felt and defined without an

ultrasound or other means. So have fun with it.

>

> The way it works is to remove a single electron from the active enzyme that

makes cancer cells reproduce rapidly. This is the same thing chemo tries to do,

but this does it better, and without side effects (other than visions of being a

pin cushion).

>

> This was pioneered by Bjorne Nordenstrom many years ago. Forrest

sells units for a modest price (much much lower than std treatments) for these.

The audience would likely be clinical people, but I guess your local

acupuncturist could give you a hand? If not then your local S & M group.

(kidding of course). Consult your doctor, or go to China. Or stay home,

consult your doctor, eat chocolate and read magazines while you stick

electrified godzilla needles into your tumors, and come out healthy while

everyone else dies. Gotta love it.

>

> bG

>

> Bioelectromagnetics. 2000 Jul;21(5):395-401.

> Experimental low-level direct current therapy in liver metastases: influence

of polarity and current dose.

> Turler A, Schaefer H, Schaefer N, Wagner M, Maintz D, Qiao JC, Hoelscher AH.

> Source

>

> Department of Visceral- and Vascular Surgery, University of Cologne, Germany.

tuerler@...

> Abstract

>

> Several authors recently reported on the successful local treatment of

malignant disease with low-level direct current therapy. However, antitumoral

effects in colorectal metastases has not been investigated experimentally. The

aim of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of this therapy and the

influence of polarity and current dose. Colorectal metastases were established

in BD IX rats by the injection of colon cancer cells under the liver capsule.

After three weeks, the liver tumor volumes were determined by magnetic resonance

imaging of the liver. Low-level direct current therapy was applied via five

platinum electrodes. Four different applications were used: 60 C/cm(3), anode at

the center; 60 C/cm(3), cathode at the center; 80 C/cm(3), anode at the center;

and 80 C/cm(3), cathode at the center. In the control group, five electrodes

were placed without applying any direct current. All animals were sacrificed on

postoperative day 7. Liver metastases were histologically examined for vital

tumor cells. Statistical analysis was performed with chi(2)-test. The mean

initial tumor diameter before treatment was 3.6 +/- 1.4 mm (volume: 25.2 +/- 9.7

mm(3)). Histological examination of the removed livers revealed significant

destruction of the metastases with localized necroses in all treatment groups;

37% had a complete response rate and 63% a partial response rate. There were no

significant necroses in the control group (P < 0.0001). The best treatment

results were obtained in the group with an anode at the center and a current

dose of 80 C/cm(3). Direct current therapy offers a new and safe method for the

local treatment of liver metastases. We were able to observe that tumor damage

is related to current dose but not to the polarity of the central electrode.

>

> Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

>

[Guest guest]

" best " could be trivial. It makes no sense to me that the tumor's parts would

be so sensitive to polarity. It might have come out close but a little better

one way in this test, but within experimental error, so it could come out the

reverse in a new experiment. They didn't consider it large enough to be

important.

bG

> >

> > This is from Germany, shows dramatic results in tumor reduction in rats.

There is currently a lot of use of this on people in China, as it is cheap and

has a very high success rate, much higher than traditional chemo-radiation

methods.

> >

> > There is an online supplier of home use, including the specially made

needles. It would probably be ok to use on tumors that can be felt and defined

without an ultrasound or other means. So have fun with it.

> >

> > The way it works is to remove a single electron from the active enzyme that

makes cancer cells reproduce rapidly. This is the same thing chemo tries to do,

but this does it better, and without side effects (other than visions of being a

pin cushion).

> >

> > This was pioneered by Bjorne Nordenstrom many years ago. Forrest

sells units for a modest price (much much lower than std treatments) for these.

The audience would likely be clinical people, but I guess your local

acupuncturist could give you a hand? If not then your local S & M group.

(kidding of course). Consult your doctor, or go to China. Or stay home,

consult your doctor, eat chocolate and read magazines while you stick

electrified godzilla needles into your tumors, and come out healthy while

everyone else dies. Gotta love it.

> >

> > bG

> >

> > Bioelectromagnetics. 2000 Jul;21(5):395-401.

> > Experimental low-level direct current therapy in liver metastases: influence

of polarity and current dose.

> > Turler A, Schaefer H, Schaefer N, Wagner M, Maintz D, Qiao JC, Hoelscher AH.

> > Source

> >

> > Department of Visceral- and Vascular Surgery, University of Cologne,

Germany. tuerler@

> > Abstract

> >

> > Several authors recently reported on the successful local treatment of

malignant disease with low-level direct current therapy. However, antitumoral

effects in colorectal metastases has not been investigated experimentally. The

aim of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of this therapy and the

influence of polarity and current dose. Colorectal metastases were established

in BD IX rats by the injection of colon cancer cells under the liver capsule.

After three weeks, the liver tumor volumes were determined by magnetic resonance

imaging of the liver. Low-level direct current therapy was applied via five

platinum electrodes. Four different applications were used: 60 C/cm(3), anode at

the center; 60 C/cm(3), cathode at the center; 80 C/cm(3), anode at the center;

and 80 C/cm(3), cathode at the center. In the control group, five electrodes

were placed without applying any direct current. All animals were sacrificed on

postoperative day 7. Liver metastases were histologically examined for vital

tumor cells. Statistical analysis was performed with chi(2)-test. The mean

initial tumor diameter before treatment was 3.6 +/- 1.4 mm (volume: 25.2 +/- 9.7

mm(3)). Histological examination of the removed livers revealed significant

destruction of the metastases with localized necroses in all treatment groups;

37% had a complete response rate and 63% a partial response rate. There were no

significant necroses in the control group (P < 0.0001). The best treatment

results were obtained in the group with an anode at the center and a current

dose of 80 C/cm(3). Direct current therapy offers a new and safe method for the

local treatment of liver metastases. We were able to observe that tumor damage

is related to current dose but not to the polarity of the central electrode.

> >

> > Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

> >

>