Guest guest Posted March 1, 2008 Report Share Posted March 1, 2008 Journal of Viral Hepatitis 15 (4) , 300–304 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2893.2007.00944.x Abstract The use of different Peg-interferon α-2b regimens plus ribavirin in HCV-1b-infected patients after rapid virological response does not affect the achievement of sustained virological response N. Napoli, G. Giannelli, A. Antonaci and S. AntonaciDepartment of Internal Medicine, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Section of Internal Medicine, University of Bari Medical School, Bari, Italy Nicola Napoli, Department of Internal Medicine, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Section of Internal Medicine, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11 70124 Bari, Italy. E-mail: n.napoli@... Abstract Summary. In patients with chronic hepatitis C, rapid virological response (RVR) at week 4 of treatment seems to be strongly associated with a high probability of achieving a sustained virological response (SVR). The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of different pegylated interferon-α2b (Peg-IFN-α2b) dosages plus ribavirin (RBV) in patients with RVR. Forty-five naïve patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-1b started Peg-IFN-α2b (1.5 μg/kg/week) in combination with weight-based RBV doses (800–1200 mg/day). Thirty-one patients (68.9%) attained RVR at week 4 of therapy, while four further patients showed negative HCV-RNA values for the first time at week 12 and were considered early virological responders (EVR). The 31 RVR patients were randomized to receive either RBV plus 1.5 μg/kg/week (17 pts) or 1.0 μg/kg/week (14 pts) of Peg-IFN-α2b for the remaining 44 weeks. The two groups were matched for age, sex, baseline alanine aminotransferase levels, viral load and fibrosis score. After 6 months of post-treatment follow-up, the prevalence of SVR was 94.1% (16/17) among RVR patients treated with 1.5 μg/kg/week and 92.8% (13/14) in RVR patients treated with 1.0 μg/kg/week (P = not significant). A high-baseline viral load (P = 0.01) and bridging fibrosis/cirrhosis (P = 0.02) negatively influenced the likelihood of achieving RVR. On the contrary, the ability of RVR patients to achieve SVR did not correlate with these baseline characteristics in either of the treatment group. Finally, the SVR rate among EVR patients who responded after more than 4 weeks of treatment was significantly lower than among RVR patients (1/4 = 25%vs 29/31 = 93.5%; P = 0.0058), because of a high prevalence of post-treatment relapse among patients with EVR. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2893.2007.00944.x _________________________________________________________________ Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging. You IM, we give. http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.