Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Extended Drug Therapy for Hepatitis Is Challenged

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/04/health/research/04hepatitis.html?ref=health

Extended Drug Therapy for Hepatitis Is Challenged

By RONI CARYN RABIN

Published: December 3, 2008

Patients who do not initially respond to standard drug therapy for treatment of

hepatitis C are unlikely to respond to long-term maintenance therapy as well,

according to a new study.

Yet many patients who do not at first respond to drugs are placed on maintenance

therapy, which is expensive and can be both physically and psychologically

grueling, in hopes that long-term treatment will keep the disease in check. The

practice is ineffective and possibly harmful, the study’s authors said.

“To the extent there are still patients out there who are on this form of

maintenance therapy, there is a real take-home message: It should be stopped,”

said the lead author, Dr. M. Di Bisceglie, professor of internal medicine

and co-director of the liver center at St. Louis University School of Medicine.

The maintenance therapy failed despite the fact that it was effective at

lowering the amount of virus in patients’ blood and reducing conventional signs

of liver damage, Dr. Di Bisceglie said.

The report appears in Thursday’s issue of The New England Journal of Medicine.

The standard treatment for hepatitis C is a regimen of two potent drugs,

peginterferon and ribavirin, that can produce side effects like fever,

debilitating fatigue and depression. But the treatment clears the virus from the

body in about half of all patients.

Those who do not respond to the initial one-two punch in six months to a year

are often advised to continue with a lower, maintenance dose of peginterferon

alone for an indefinite period.

The new study, conducted at multiple medical centers and supported by the

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, followed 1,050

patients with advanced liver disease who had failed to respond to initial

treatment for three and a half years. Most of the subjects were men, and their

mean age was 51. About half received low doses of peginterferon, while half

received no therapy.

Patients on long-term peginterferon fared just as poorly as nonresponders who

were not taking the drug, the investigators found.

About a third in each group developed serious complications of hepatitis C, like

liver cancer and liver failure.

Eight patients on peginterferon died, compared with two who were not taking the

drug, a statistically significant difference, researchers said.

“This is a treatment that should not be done,” said Dr. Worman, professor

of medicine at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, who was

not involved in the study. “Patients should just sit tight and wait for new

treatments or drugs to be added, which will happen within a few years.”

Dr. Bernstein, chief of gastroenterology and hepatology at North Shore

University Hospital on Long Island, said there might still be a “glimmer of

hope,” though very little evidence, that some hepatitis C patients who failed

the initial course of treatment might benefit from extended maintenance

treatment.

But for now, Dr. Bernstein added, “there’s no reason to make someone feel sicker

than they generally feel.”

A version of this article appeared in print on December 4, 2008, on page A29 of

the New York edition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...