Guest guest Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01428.x/abstract;jse\ ssionid=E4515335B766472ACBE48CEF3A0E0CCE.d03t04?systemMessage=Wiley+Online+Libra\ ry+will+be+disrupted+2nd+Apr+from+10-12+BST+for+monthly+maintenance Improving graft survival for patients undergoing liver transplantation Rolland C. Dickson1, Surakit Pungpapong2, P. Keaveny2, C. Burcin Taner2, Marwan Ghabril3, Aranda-Michel2, Raj Satyanarayana2, Hugo Bonatti4, J. Kramer2, H. Nguyen2Article first published online: 23 MAR 2011 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01428.x © 2011 Wiley & Sons A/S. Issue Clinical Transplantation Early View (Articles online in advance of print) Author Information 1Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 2Department of Transplantation, Mayo Clinic, ville, FL 3Department of Medicine, Clarian/Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 4Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA *Correspondence: Corresponding author: Rolland C. Dickson, MD, Director Hepatology Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756-0001, USA. Tel.: 603 650 6734; fax: 603 650 5225; e-mail: Rolland.C.Dickson@... Conflict of interest: None. Conflict of interest: None. Publication History Article first published online: 23 MAR 2011 Accepted for publication 03 February 2011 Abstract:  Liver transplant (LT) outcomes are reported to be improving in non-HCV recipients but not for those infected with HCV. Our aim was to evaluate graft survival and predictors of outcome in HCV and non-HCV patients before and after 2003. Patients with primary LT between February 1, 1998, and December 31, 2005, were included. Patients were divided into Era 1 (1998–2002) and Era 2 (2003–2005) with follow-up through May 31, 2009. Graft survival was compared for HCV, non-HCV, and all patients. There was significant improvement in graft survival in Era 2 for HCV patients. Graft survival in Era 2 of HCV patients was equivalent to non-HCV patients. The most significant improvement between eras was in outcomes of grafts from donors ≥60 yr with three-yr graft survival 58.6 (51.3–65.9) vs. 75.4 (68.9–81.9), p = 0.002. The use of donors ≥60 did not change between eras: 31% vs. 34%; however, utilization in HCV recipients decreased from 36% to 3% (p < 0.001). In conclusion, graft survival of HCV patients has improved significantly since 2003 and was comparable to non-HCV patients up to three yr. The change in management of donor organs into HCV and non-HCV patients likely contributed to this outcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.