Guest guest Posted January 5, 2007 Report Share Posted January 5, 2007 I don’t know enough about the differences between RA and sarcoidosis to give congratulations or sympathy. Neither one sounds very good. I do think I would get a second opinion just to make sure the correct disease is being treated. I have no reason to doubt your doctor but I would feel better with independent confirmation. I hope your treatment goes well, and you are welcome to stay here even if it is not RA. God bless. From: Rheumatoid Arthritis [mailto:Rheumatoid Arthritis ] On Behalf Of mcsooey Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 9:35 AM Rheumatoid Arthritis Subject: I just got the word from my Dr...no RA for me! Hi RA Gang, I got the final word from Dr. DiSabitino in New Haven, CT yesterdeay. After a full exam, tons of questions, xrays and final blood work he is sure I do NOT have RA! He sees OA in my hands, lower spine, left hip and what he thinks is a Sarcoid 'cyst' on my right wrist...but NO RA! This was very good news but I admit to being a bit dissapointed. I know, that is a very strange statement to make. But, I have chronic Sarcoidosis which is what he feels caused a false positive RA Factor in my blood work back in November. The Sarcoid is in my lungs and is dong a great deal of damage. Damage that will never go away. The immuno-suppresents and the Methotrexate are used in the treatment for both RA and Sarcoid. RA is treated early and aggressivaly to stop joint damage. Sarcoid is not treated until you really can not live without it. If there was an up side to having RA it was treating it could have also helped my lungs. But...the real UP SIDE is...I don't have RA!!! He gave me a list of symptoms and issues to watch out for. He was sure to tell me that even though he is sure my positive RA Factor was a false positive...on paper, it was still positive. I could be in the very early stages of RA but he sees no indication other than that first blood test. So, for now, I am happy. So, thank you all for being here. I learned a great deal from reading your posts. It was so good to know that I had a place to come to where I knew I could find some answers to my many questions. I hope you are all feeling as well as you are able and that each day brings new hope and comfort. Thank you all. Sooey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2007 Report Share Posted January 5, 2007 Hi, Harold, Yes, I agree, both RA and Sarcoidosis are awful. But now, thank goodness, I only have to worry about one of them. It was my Pulmo who ordered the blood work in November that showed the positive RA Factor. He was the one who refered me to DiSabatino for a second opinion. I was dx with the sarc back in August of '03. I had no idea I had it, I had never heard of it. It was discovered during follow-up xrays after a routine colonoscopy. In the xrays they showed the bottom lobes of my lungs and, saw some awful junk that is not sapose to be there. I had a CT scan two days later and the Radiologist told my GP that what he was seeing was advanced, no hope, lung cancer. It was my GP who said No...can't be. He asked the Radiologist if it could be sarcoid...I was robust, healthy in every other way...lung cancer was not it. The radiologist agreed that if not lung cancer than it could be sarcoidosis. I had a biopsy, mediastinosopy where they took out some lymph nodes from my chest and BINGO! Sarcoidosis...I was very happy. Now, don't get me wrong, sarcoid really sucks...but it's not cancer. My Pulmo thinks I've had it for about 10 - 15 years and never knew it. Which, by the way, is not at all uncommon...to have it and never know it. My lungs are in very bad shape. I have chest xrays about twice a year, PFTs twice a year and since '03 I have watched my oxygen dyfusion rate go from 98% down to 73%. That is one reason that the possible dx of RA, while not something to wish for or fool around with, could have been a mixed blessing. What's good for RA also seems to be good for Sarcoid. As we know, RA is treated early and agressivly. For Sarcoid, treatment is only done as a very last resort. I am not receiving treatment for the Sarcoid. Dr's take a wait and see approach. 30 % of the people who have sarc never know they have it. It comes and goes on it's own, leaving only scars to prove it was there. Another 30% get it, know they have it but it goes away in about 2 - 3 years. 30% get it, it becomes chronic, with time you need o2, you become disabled, yada, yada, yada and, the last 10% of the sarcoid population get it, suffer greatly and die from it. Sarcoid is one of the illnesses that we are seeing crop up as a rusult of the events of Sept. 11th. Many of the volunteers at ground zero are now showing sarcoid. Dr.s have no idea what causes it. They have very few treatments for it. The two main treatments being prednisone and methotrexate. The immuno-suppressents are new to sarcoid. Some times it helps, sometimes it dosen't. It seems that I, along with all the other folks with chronic sarcoid will have to wait for the medical tide to turn or, a new discovery or treatment for the sarc. For now, I'm not bad. I can still get around, almost like always. I know what I can and can't do. I can feel it getting worse which is very depressing to me, but I'm much better off than many and...I don't have RA...For now...I will rejoyce in that bit of good news... Thanks, Harold. Be well. Sooey > > I don't know enough about the differences between RA and sarcoidosis to give > congratulations or sympathy. Neither one sounds very good. I do think I > would get a second opinion just to make sure the correct disease is being > treated. I have no reason to doubt your doctor but I would feel better with > independent confirmation. I hope your treatment goes well, and you are > welcome to stay here even if it is not RA. God bless. > > > > _____ > > From: Rheumatoid Arthritis > [mailto:Rheumatoid Arthritis ] On Behalf Of mcsooey > Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 9:35 AM > Rheumatoid Arthritis > Subject: I just got the word from my Dr...no RA for > me! > > > > Hi RA Gang, > > I got the final word from Dr. DiSabitino in New Haven, CT yesterdeay. > After a full exam, tons of questions, xrays and final blood work he is > sure I do NOT have RA! He sees OA in my hands, lower spine, left hip > and what he thinks is a Sarcoid 'cyst' on my right wrist...but NO RA! > > This was very good news but I admit to being a bit dissapointed. I > know, that is a very strange statement to make. But, I have chronic > Sarcoidosis which is what he feels caused a false positive RA Factor > in my blood work back in November. The Sarcoid is in my lungs and is > dong a great deal of damage. Damage that will never go away. The > immuno-suppresents and the Methotrexate are used in the treatment for > both RA and Sarcoid. RA is treated early and aggressivaly to stop > joint damage. Sarcoid is not treated until you really can not live > without it. If there was an up side to having RA it was treating it > could have also helped my lungs. > > But...the real UP SIDE is...I don't have RA!!! He gave me a list of > symptoms and issues to watch out for. He was sure to tell me that > even though he is sure my positive RA Factor was a false positive...on > paper, it was still positive. I could be in the very early stages of > RA but he sees no indication other than that first blood test. So, > for now, I am happy. > > So, thank you all for being here. I learned a great deal from reading > your posts. It was so good to know that I had a place to come to > where I knew I could find some answers to my many questions. I hope > you are all feeling as well as you are able and that each day brings > new hope and comfort. Thank you all. > > Sooey > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.