Guest guest Posted May 31, 1999 Report Share Posted May 31, 1999 Dear Gretchen, You are right. Seems Mission comes before the health of the forces. I find it hard to believe that it took them this long to figure things out. Now everyone sees what we have been dealing with! I figured it out! We have all been mass hypnotized, that's why we have these symptoms! BOB anna nim wrote: > > From: anna nim <anna_nim@...> > > In Meryl's Friday post: > > Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 23:34:19 -0400 > From: Meryl Nass <mnass@...> > > " 4. Reasons for not filing VAERS are interesting. Since an adverse > reaction may prevent further vaccination, and thereby prevent a > servicemember from deployment, interfering with a career, some > physicians feel it is unethical to report adverse effects, based on the > " first do no harm " principle. For those part-timers such as pilots, a > VAERS could potentially end a civilian career. So far, only 111 VAERS > have been filed for 250,000 vaccinees. " > > Well, the hypocratic oath must now be a PRETZEL in military medical > circles. The twisted logic of military doctors to continue to vaccinate > people, and not report the reactions is incredible. I honesly think > I have celery stalks in the crisper with an IQ higher than that logic > would source from. And I suppose they all came up with the same logic > at the same time....? That's about as likely as the 'coinsidences' > better known as price fixing, also thought of as illegal, unethical and > conspiratorial. Even in the laws that define conspiracys, it is not > necessary to openly suggest to each person what is expected of them. It > would be possible to convey these expectations of military doctors by > simply posing hypothetical questions to them. There seems to be an > across the board 'trend' to not report the reactions or file them, > not to be sent on. I wonder what the mathematical odds are of that > occuring naturally are!? > > Gretchen > > The Oath > by Hippocrates, 400 BC > http://www.cs.bu.edu/staff/TA/jconsidi/oath.html > " ...I will give no deadly medicine to anyone if asked, nor suggest any > such counsel " > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 Perhaps for some better clarification, so we don't propagate a complete yarn or urban legend, for our own purient interests, this may be of interest - about the Hippocratic Oath - saying the words *Do No Harm* are not actually in the *oath. Glad Day ~ Karla in IL http://www.geocities.com/everwild7/noharm.html And then this. Ethical Implications of Direct-to-Consumer Drug Adversising. http://www.herbalconsultant.com/Ethics_Drug_Advertising.pdf If you love your pets and have them vaccinated..........some interesting info. http://rimadyldeath.com/VACCINATIONS.htm Never miss a thing. Make your homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2008 Report Share Posted March 4, 2008 A bit of historical information about the phrase " First, do no harm " : " First, do no harm " : Not in the Hippocratic Oath It is a widely held misconception that the familiar dictum " First, do no harm " comes from the Hippocratic Oath, an oath many physicians take when they enter medical practice. However, the Hippocratic Oath does not and never did contain those words (nor was it actually written by Hippocrates, according to many sources). It expresses a similar idea, but never employs the words " First, do no harm. " It is the opinion of many scholars that Hippocrates did, in fact, originate the phrase, but did so in his Epidemics, Bk. I, Sect. XI. One translation reads: " Declare the past, diagnose the present, foretell the future; practice these acts. As to diseases, make a habit of two things — to help, or at least to do no harm. " The Greek " First, do no harm " becomes " Primum non nocere " in Latin. A translation of the original perhaps, but some sources attribute " Primum non nocere " to the Roman physician, Galen. Today there is no single oath that all physicians take upon entering practice. Depending on where they earn their medical degrees, they may take any one of many pledges, but all embody the ethics and ideals of Hippocrates, the acknowledged father of modern medicine. The exact wording of the original oath has been subject to dispute, as translations and interpretations of the original Greek have varied. Complicating the picture are the many modernizations of the oath which take into account changes in language, social mores, and medicine itself over the centuries.Rima On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:18 PM, karla walsh <faerie1952@...> wrote: Perhaps for some better clarification, so we don't propagate a complete yarn or urban legend, for our own purient interests, this may be of interest - about the Hippocratic Oath - saying the words *Do No Harm* are not actually in the *oath. Glad Day ~ Karla in IL http://www.geocities.com/everwild7/noharm.html And then this. Ethical Implications of Direct-to-Consumer Drug Adversising. http://www.herbalconsultant.com/Ethics_Drug_Advertising.pdf If you love your pets and have them vaccinated..........some interesting info. http://rimadyldeath.com/VACCINATIONS.htm Never miss a thing. Make your homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.