Guest guest Posted September 27, 2008 Report Share Posted September 27, 2008 http://www.independent.co.uk/money/invest-save/kate-hughes-why-hep-c-sufferers-n\ eed-a-fair-deal-943897.html Kate : Why hep C sufferers need a fair deal Saturday, 27 September 2008 If people with HIV/Aids were faced with ignorant and inconsistent treatment by the protection industry, there would be uproar. The word " discrimination " would be hurled about – and fair enough. Thankfully, the way HIV-positive life assurance customers are treated has improved greatly over the past few years, with much more effective guidelines and regulations enforced among protection providers. But a report seen exclusively by The Independent indicates that sufferers from the disease hepatitis C – about 500,000 in the UK, far more than the 70,000 or so living with HIV/Aids – face ill-informed companies who add huge amounts to premiums. Hepatitis C is an infection that causes inflammation of the liver. Most people don't realise they have it, complaining only of fatigue and vague pain around their liver. Many GPs fail to diagnose it. It is passed on through infected blood, so carriers have often had blood transfusions or intravenous medical treatment, or are drug users who shared needles or had sex with an infected person. Infection rates are about 1 per cent in Europe, 2 per cent in the USA, and as much as 10 per cent in some communities in Egypt, South Asia and Eastern Europe. Just as the Department of Health is set to launch a hepatitis C awareness campaign, research by the independent financial advice firm Compass has found that there is no consistent approach on hepatitis C sufferers' premiums. Some providers add 50 per cent, some 200 per cent. And 90 per cent of life assurance providers were unable to give any clear information on the disease, the report found. Hep C can permanently damage your liver and seriously affect life expectancy. But sufferers can and do recover, life expectancy can return to near-normal levels, and life can carry on as usual, although ex-sufferers will always carry signs of the disease in their bloodstream. Unfortunately, life assurance companies don't see it like that, and will treat all hep C-positive cases the same. of Compass says: " The fact there are no guidelines for the way hep C is treated, and that each company has different ideas about how to treat clients, is remarkable. " Gore of the Hepatitis C Trust agrees. " Hepatitis C is a disease that disproportionately affects the underprivileged and vulnerable. Having the insurance industry compound that is unacceptable, " he says, adding that protection providers have failed to keep up with advances in hepatitis C treatment. " We must have some clear, standardised guidelines. " In a statement, the Association of British Insurers argued that they were on top of the issue, while seeming to miss the point. " Insurers are acutely aware and sensitive to the issues around sexually transmitted diseases like hepatitis C, and treat customers sensitively and respectfully. The ABI Statement of Best Practice for HIV and Insurance sets out best practice for ABI members, when dealing with applications where HIV may be an issue. This includes ensuring that each application is considered individually, based solely on best available evidence. If you have a test for hepatitis C with a negative result, then you do not need to tell your insurance company and it will not be taken into account. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.