Guest guest Posted January 28, 2006 Report Share Posted January 28, 2006 Golly I hope this will go through to you all - an article in our recent newspaper here in Ontario by a man being touted as " Dr. Vaccination " ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 28, 2006 Report Share Posted January 28, 2006 I see it didn't go through ...the short and not so sweet of the article states that a Doctor at York Central Hospital north of Toronto is being touted as " Dr Vacccination " because after his Daugther contracted pne. meningitis and was left deaf he went on a mission to help the Province (and all other Provinces in our country) offer, free of charge, the Prevnar vaccination to all children in the routine immunization program. The article provides stats too. Would someone please let me know - does Prevnar still contain mercury in it? Thanks Tania Ontario, Canada Fw: Vaccination > Golly I hope this will go through to you all - an article in our recent > newspaper here in Ontario by a man being touted as " Dr. Vaccination " ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2006 Report Share Posted April 24, 2006 When my niece was pregnant, my brother tried to tell her about being careful about vaccinations. When she had the baby and tried to decline the Hep B at the hospital, the nurse told her it was the law! So she let them vaccinate the baby before leaving the hospital. We can only hope my little great niece will be okay. We are in Texas, and to my knowledge there is no law that says babies must be vaccinated before they leave the hospital. Is there anyone out there who knows for sure? I'd like to write a letter to the hospital concerning this nurse manipulating and threatening my niece. Haven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2006 Report Share Posted April 24, 2006 http://www.vaccineinfo.net/exemptions/index.shtml Birth Exemptions: http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/texas.htmFor those who are planning a hospital birth but want to evade invasive routine post natal procedures such as a Hep B shot, vitamin K injection, newborn screening, or the application of silver nitrate in the newborn's eyes, a very specific birthing plan must be submitted to the hospital in advance of the birth. Hospital staff must be informed, in advance, of your needs, wants and desires where your baby and birthing experience are concerned. The same applies to midwives. -----Original Message-----From: EOHarm [mailto:EOHarm ]On Behalf Of HavenSent: Monday, April 24, 2006 11:39 AMEOHarm Subject: Re: Re: vaccination When my niece was pregnant, my brother tried to tell her about being careful about vaccinations. When she had the baby and tried to decline the Hep B at the hospital, the nurse told her it was the law! So she let them vaccinate the baby before leaving the hospital. We can only hope my little great niece will be okay. We are in Texas, and to my knowledge there is no law that says babies must be vaccinated before they leave the hospital. Is there anyone out there who knows for sure? I'd like to write a letter to the hospital concerning this nurse manipulating and threatening my niece. Haven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2006 Report Share Posted April 24, 2006 I am in CA and avoided all these things by merely asking. I talked with my ped. who gave me a Rx for Vita K )oral) which I didn't even fill)...no hep B here anyway and no eye drops. THey made me feel a little uncomfortable and I had to keep reminding....but that was it. Again. Unvaccinated...no Vit K shot no eyes drops...healthiest of the thre... > > http://www.vaccineinfo.net/exemptions/index.shtml > > Birth Exemptions: http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/texas.htm > > For those who are planning a hospital birth but want to evade invasive > routine post natal procedures such as a Hep B shot, vitamin K injection, > newborn screening, or the application of silver nitrate in the newborn's > eyes, a very specific birthing plan must be submitted to the hospital in > advance of the birth. Hospital staff must be informed, in advance, of your > needs, wants and desires where your baby and birthing experience are > concerned. The same applies to midwives. > > Re: Re: vaccination > > > When my niece was pregnant, my brother tried to tell her about being > careful about vaccinations. When she had the baby and tried to decline the > Hep B at the hospital, the nurse told her it was the law! So she let them > vaccinate the baby before leaving the hospital. We can only hope my little > great niece will be okay. > > > > > We are in Texas, and to my knowledge there is no law that says babies must > be vaccinated before they leave the hospital. Is there anyone out there who > knows for sure? I'd like to write a letter to the hospital concerning this > nurse manipulating and threatening my niece. > > > > > Haven > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 Eden, Raw milk can be a delivery medium for mycoplasmas that our cows receive when they are injected with contaminated vaccines.How many of us really wish to put our trust in the corporate pharmaceutical industry?Are they more interested in our health or their economic health? http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0ISW/is_2002_Jan/ai_81138258 http://www.whale.to/vaccine/driscoll11.html where does that one death in 8000 figure come from? Has vaccination technology change enough since yesteryear to assure us that it is now safe? I believe that many of us are growing tired of these same old scare tactics without even a feeble attempt at backing them up with honest research. michaelSubject: VaccinationTo: "RawDairy " <RawDairy >Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 10:58 PM LOL Gordon I said I came late to the discussion, not to RawDairy. I am aware many proponents of raw dairy eschew vaccination of themselves and their children. I wasn't discussing vaccinating my children. I was discussing vaccinating livestock to protect children. I find one death out of eight thousand or so livestock and pets vaccinated acceptable if that gives patents (myself included) peace of mind in a rabies endemic area. If the animals developed an autism spectrum disorder or other less dramatic consequence I doubt we would notice. So my homework is to read a book written about the yesteryear of vaccination technology, huh? Yours is to ask the parents of the beautiful daughter who'll never give them grandchildren after a bout of cervical cancer at the age of 24 if they wished they'd had access to that vaccine when she was twelve. I wonder if you addressed my post with disproportionate anger and scorn because you are afraid a medical professional speaking from personal experience would be listened to? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 I'll try that again http://www.whale.to/vaccine/driscoll1.html--- Subject: Re: VaccinationTo: RawDairy Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 11:25 PM Eden, Raw milk can be a delivery medium for mycoplasmas that our cows receive when they are injected with contaminated vaccines.How many of us really wish to put our trust in the corporate pharmaceutical industry?Are they more interested in our health or their economic health? http://findarticles .com/p/articles/ mi_m0ISW/ is_2002_Jan/ ai_81138258 http://www.whale. to/vaccine/ driscoll11. html where does that one death in 8000 figure come from? Has vaccination technology change enough since yesteryear to assure us that it is now safe? I believe that many of us are growing tired of these same old scare tactics without even a feeble attempt at backing them up with honest research. michaelFrom: Eden <m1231egmail (DOT) com>Subject: VaccinationTo: "RawDairy@yahoogrou ps.com" <RawDairy@yahoogroup s.com>Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 10:58 PM LOL Gordon I said I came late to the discussion, not to RawDairy. I am aware many proponents of raw dairy eschew vaccination of themselves and their children. I wasn't discussing vaccinating my children. I was discussing vaccinating livestock to protect children. I find one death out of eight thousand or so livestock and pets vaccinated acceptable if that gives patents (myself included) peace of mind in a rabies endemic area. If the animals developed an autism spectrum disorder or other less dramatic consequence I doubt we would notice. So my homework is to read a book written about the yesteryear of vaccination technology, huh? Yours is to ask the parents of the beautiful daughter who'll never give them grandchildren after a bout of cervical cancer at the age of 24 if they wished they'd had access to that vaccine when she was twelve. I wonder if you addressed my post with disproportionate anger and scorn because you are afraid a medical professional speaking from personal experience would be listened to? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 I am a veterinarian, mother and livestock producer (family dairy cows, beef, sheep) who lives in a rabies endemic area as well. I think that it should be a personal decision rather than a government mandated one as to whether livestock be vaccinated. I vaccinate my dogs and cats, who are avid hunters, but do not vaccinate my horse, cows, sheep, or children. Consumers have a right to know if the foods they are purchasing come from vaccinated animals or not and make their own decisions, just as they ought to be able to do for GMO foods and BGH milk and meat. Unfortunately, in this litigious society, very few people are willing to accept personal responsibility for their choices and want our government to control our very lives under the guise of keeping us safe and we are stuck living under majority rule. I also vaccinate as minimally as possible, sometimes using titers as a gage of protection. I realize that they are a controversial tool, but in lieu of challenge tests, they are the only one we have. Ober Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 I am a veterinarian, mother and livestock producer (family dairy cows, beef, sheep) who lives in a rabies endemic area as well. I think that it should be a personal decision rather than a government mandated one as to whether livestock be vaccinated. I vaccinate my dogs and cats, who are avid hunters, but do not vaccinate my horse, cows, sheep, or children. Consumers have a right to know if the foods they are purchasing come from vaccinated animals or not and make their own decisions, just as they ought to be able to do for GMO foods and BGH milk and meat. Unfortunately, in this litigious society, very few people are willing to accept personal responsibility for their choices and want our government to control our very lives under the guise of keeping us safe and we are stuck living under majority rule. I also vaccinate as minimally as possible, sometimes using titers as a gage of protection. I realize that they are a controversial tool, but in lieu of challenge tests, they are the only one we have. Ober Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 > Yours is to ask the parents of the beautiful daughter who'll never > give them grandchildren after a bout of cervical cancer at the age of > 24 if they wished they'd had access to that vaccine when she was twelve. > I wonder if you addressed my post with disproportionate anger and > scorn because you are afraid a medical professional speaking from > personal experience would be listened to? > Did she get the cervical cancer from HPV or her mother taking DES? and what about all the parents whose children have been permanently damaged or killed by vaccine reactions? You can go round and round on this. The AVMA (http://www.avma.org/issues/vaccination/vaccination.asp) and AAHA (http://www.aahanet.org/PublicDocuments/VaccineGuidelines06Revised.pdf) are both trying to convince small animal practitioners to reduce frequency of vaccines, and veterinarians at University of Wisconsin (Dr. Ron Schmid) and University of Colorado, and Cornell University are all on the forefront of calling for re evaluation and reduction/ minimization of the vaccines used in animals. As veterinarians, we have seen the effects of vaccination benefits (think parvo epidemics in the 80s), and risks (lymphoma, IMHA, hypo and hyper thyroidism, fibrosarcoma, autoimmune disease....). Hopefully we do not need to repeat the same mistakes in the human population and our food supply to learn something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 > Yours is to ask the parents of the beautiful daughter who'll never > give them grandchildren after a bout of cervical cancer at the age of > 24 if they wished they'd had access to that vaccine when she was twelve. > I wonder if you addressed my post with disproportionate anger and > scorn because you are afraid a medical professional speaking from > personal experience would be listened to? > Did she get the cervical cancer from HPV or her mother taking DES? and what about all the parents whose children have been permanently damaged or killed by vaccine reactions? You can go round and round on this. The AVMA (http://www.avma.org/issues/vaccination/vaccination.asp) and AAHA (http://www.aahanet.org/PublicDocuments/VaccineGuidelines06Revised.pdf) are both trying to convince small animal practitioners to reduce frequency of vaccines, and veterinarians at University of Wisconsin (Dr. Ron Schmid) and University of Colorado, and Cornell University are all on the forefront of calling for re evaluation and reduction/ minimization of the vaccines used in animals. As veterinarians, we have seen the effects of vaccination benefits (think parvo epidemics in the 80s), and risks (lymphoma, IMHA, hypo and hyper thyroidism, fibrosarcoma, autoimmune disease....). Hopefully we do not need to repeat the same mistakes in the human population and our food supply to learn something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 > Yours is to ask the parents of the beautiful daughter who'll never > give them grandchildren after a bout of cervical cancer at the age of > 24 if they wished they'd had access to that vaccine when she was twelve. > I wonder if you addressed my post with disproportionate anger and > scorn because you are afraid a medical professional speaking from > personal experience would be listened to? > Did she get the cervical cancer from HPV or her mother taking DES? and what about all the parents whose children have been permanently damaged or killed by vaccine reactions? You can go round and round on this. The AVMA (http://www.avma.org/issues/vaccination/vaccination.asp) and AAHA (http://www.aahanet.org/PublicDocuments/VaccineGuidelines06Revised.pdf) are both trying to convince small animal practitioners to reduce frequency of vaccines, and veterinarians at University of Wisconsin (Dr. Ron Schmid) and University of Colorado, and Cornell University are all on the forefront of calling for re evaluation and reduction/ minimization of the vaccines used in animals. As veterinarians, we have seen the effects of vaccination benefits (think parvo epidemics in the 80s), and risks (lymphoma, IMHA, hypo and hyper thyroidism, fibrosarcoma, autoimmune disease....). Hopefully we do not need to repeat the same mistakes in the human population and our food supply to learn something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 > > Instead of vaccintaing our girls with toxic sub. to prevent cancer that is brought on by early s-x conduct, why not teach them to wait until marriage? Sorry. Usually I just lurk, but this is very close to home and that is such a short-sighted comment. Sometimes the risks associated with a product are outweighed by an individual's potential to contract the disease in question. I got cervical cancer at 25. I got breast cancer at 45. I'm 47. It didn't make a difference to wait for marriage to have S-x. I got genetic testing and found that I have a BRAC 2 gene that predisposes me to all sorts of cancers (80% chance over the general population) and my children have a 50% chance of having the same gene. My daughter, age 14, was to travel abroad with other children and a couple chaperones as a student ambassador to our country (that means she's smart w/ a good head on her shoulders and pretty too) and guess what? Sometimes a girl doesn't willingly spread her legs (can you say Rape?)! Hell Yes, my daughter got the vaccination! She is the only patient our doctor has vaccinated. He does not encourage young females to get this vaccine. Except for our family. You may choose not to vaccinate for anything. I wish you, your family, and your animals good health forever, but do not judge others because you may have to walk in their shoes someday. Carol 1 in 5 women will develop breast cancer (general population). > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 > > Instead of vaccintaing our girls with toxic sub. to prevent cancer that is brought on by early s-x conduct, why not teach them to wait until marriage? Sorry. Usually I just lurk, but this is very close to home and that is such a short-sighted comment. Sometimes the risks associated with a product are outweighed by an individual's potential to contract the disease in question. I got cervical cancer at 25. I got breast cancer at 45. I'm 47. It didn't make a difference to wait for marriage to have S-x. I got genetic testing and found that I have a BRAC 2 gene that predisposes me to all sorts of cancers (80% chance over the general population) and my children have a 50% chance of having the same gene. My daughter, age 14, was to travel abroad with other children and a couple chaperones as a student ambassador to our country (that means she's smart w/ a good head on her shoulders and pretty too) and guess what? Sometimes a girl doesn't willingly spread her legs (can you say Rape?)! Hell Yes, my daughter got the vaccination! She is the only patient our doctor has vaccinated. He does not encourage young females to get this vaccine. Except for our family. You may choose not to vaccinate for anything. I wish you, your family, and your animals good health forever, but do not judge others because you may have to walk in their shoes someday. Carol 1 in 5 women will develop breast cancer (general population). > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 > > Instead of vaccintaing our girls with toxic sub. to prevent cancer that is brought on by early s-x conduct, why not teach them to wait until marriage? Sorry. Usually I just lurk, but this is very close to home and that is such a short-sighted comment. Sometimes the risks associated with a product are outweighed by an individual's potential to contract the disease in question. I got cervical cancer at 25. I got breast cancer at 45. I'm 47. It didn't make a difference to wait for marriage to have S-x. I got genetic testing and found that I have a BRAC 2 gene that predisposes me to all sorts of cancers (80% chance over the general population) and my children have a 50% chance of having the same gene. My daughter, age 14, was to travel abroad with other children and a couple chaperones as a student ambassador to our country (that means she's smart w/ a good head on her shoulders and pretty too) and guess what? Sometimes a girl doesn't willingly spread her legs (can you say Rape?)! Hell Yes, my daughter got the vaccination! She is the only patient our doctor has vaccinated. He does not encourage young females to get this vaccine. Except for our family. You may choose not to vaccinate for anything. I wish you, your family, and your animals good health forever, but do not judge others because you may have to walk in their shoes someday. Carol 1 in 5 women will develop breast cancer (general population). > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 8, 2008 Report Share Posted August 8, 2008 Even the TV ads for Gardasil state that it won't prevent all forms of cervical cancer. > In RawDairy , J Franz <schmookie66@> wrote: > > > > Wish I had the vaccine or I wouldn't have cervical cancer now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 8, 2008 Report Share Posted August 8, 2008 Even the TV ads for Gardasil state that it won't prevent all forms of cervical cancer. > In RawDairy , J Franz <schmookie66@> wrote: > > > > Wish I had the vaccine or I wouldn't have cervical cancer now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 8, 2008 Report Share Posted August 8, 2008 Even the TV ads for Gardasil state that it won't prevent all forms of cervical cancer. > In RawDairy , J Franz <schmookie66@> wrote: > > > > Wish I had the vaccine or I wouldn't have cervical cancer now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 What religions are against vaccinations? thanks, Kathie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 What religions are against vaccinations? thanks, Kathie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2011 Report Share Posted October 14, 2011 You don't have to be a member of a certain religion in most states - the religious exemption is broad and you just sign that it is against your religious beliefs,basically. What state are you concerned about? Sheri What religions are against vaccinations? thanks, Kathie. Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA Vaccines - http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes start October 14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2011 Report Share Posted October 14, 2011 You don't have to be a member of a certain religion in most states - the religious exemption is broad and you just sign that it is against your religious beliefs,basically. What state are you concerned about? Sheri What religions are against vaccinations? thanks, Kathie. Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA Vaccines - http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes start October 14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.