Guest guest Posted July 27, 2000 Report Share Posted July 27, 2000 Dear Ms. Clayton: I have read the attached article, and would like to thank you for raising this issue to the readers. I do hope that you will review your information so that certain aspects of the article are not misconstrued. As a health care provider, and someone who is very active in the Hepatitis C, (HCV), community, I would like to highlight some of the issues that may not be as they appear. While, in the U.S., there are no questions as to the the HCV epidemic, per the CDC, the data on the transmission of the virus is not entirely accurate. The virus is definitely blood borne, and therefore, while IV Drug use can not be overlooked, it is not as frequently transmitted today as it once was. In fact, while an IVDA risks HIV and HCV, a large majority of the HCV population did not obtain it from this source. Sexual transmission is such a small number of cases, and usually is not documented as the only " risk factor " , that those victims are undocumentable to state that sexual transmission was the cause. In fact, there is a far higher risk using someone who has HCV, and using their toothbrush. then contracting the virus through sexual contact. In fact, the highest single risk factor for transmission lies in blood transfusion and blood by products. Today, some of the other main identified risks include: tattoo's, body piercings, accidental needle sticks, and the like. For an unknown reason, Veterans and Fire Fighters seem to have a disproportionate number of infections, and the epidemiology has not been established. I hope that you will add, or rewrite your article, because you are in a position to help the hundreds of thousands of already infected victims, as well as to increase public awareness. If you would like detailed references on these and similar facts, I would be more than happy to assist in directing you to the latest research in this area, as well, as, I am sure many of your readers may be willing to share their stories with you. Sincerely, Schoen, ARNP, RN, MSN, MHA, MBA Letters to the Editor, The Times Valley Edition, 20000 Prairie St., Chatsworth Ca 91311 or via Internet to FAX: (818) 772-3385 Valley Edition Phone: (818) 772-3200 Janet Clayton Janet Clayton, Editor of the Editorial Pages " Hep C, Thriving on Ignorance " Hepatitis C, a blood-borne, potentially fatal liver disease spread mostly by sexual contact and intravenous drug use, has become an underrecognized epidemic in California, afflicting an estimated half-million residents in Riverside County, 24% of jail inmates test positive, and a soon-to-be-released study from the state's Health and Human Services Agency is expected to show that fully one-third of all convicts entering state prisons have the virus. Unlike for the better-understood hepatitis A and B, there is no vaccine for hepatitis C. The disease often leads to liver failure if not treated. That's an increasingly common occurrence, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control (CDC), which said that 70% of those infected don't even realize they have the disease because symptoms often don't appear for years, long after liver damage begins. That's why early detection and public education are so critical to reining in the epidemic. State health officials should start by testing, counseling and treating accessible populations with the high infection rate. These include: *Drug users in needle exchange programs. The CDC urges that all " persons who ever injected illegal drugs, including those who injected once or a few times many years ago " should get tested. However, most needle exchange programs in California do not give out any information on hep C, much less urge participants to get tested. *Patients in veterans hospitals. A study last year of 26,000 patients in Department of Veterans Affairs facilities found that nearly 8% tested positive for hepatitis C. Among Vietnam War vets seeking medical help at VA facilities, the rate was substantially higher. In California, 140,000 veterans may be infected. The Clinton administration has asked Congress to give the VA $340 million next year to test and treat veterans with the hep C. That's $145 million more than what Congress allocated last year. Unfortunately, the VA has been slow to take advantage of the federal help. Last week, American Liver Assn. President Alan Brownstein told Congress that " the Department of Veterans Affairs has consistently underspent " it's hepatitis C prevention and treatment dollars. *Prisioners: In California, at the minimum, state prisons should determine the overall incidence of hepatitis C, not just the rates among newly arrived prisoners. The disease is little recognized outside high-risk groups, but its public health costs are growing. According to the American Liver Assn., the waiting list of potential liver recipients has more than tripled in the last five years, mostly because of chronic liver failures brought on by hepatitis C. Because the disease is " silent " for so long, the true rate of infection is not known. It is certain, however, that without better public education and testing, hepatitis C will continue to spread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 2000 Report Share Posted July 27, 2000 Dear Ms. Clayton: I have read the attached article, and would like to thank you for raising this issue to the readers. I do hope that you will review your information so that certain aspects of the article are not misconstrued. As a health care provider, and someone who is very active in the Hepatitis C, (HCV), community, I would like to highlight some of the issues that may not be as they appear. While, in the U.S., there are no questions as to the the HCV epidemic, per the CDC, the data on the transmission of the virus is not entirely accurate. The virus is definitely blood borne, and therefore, while IV Drug use can not be overlooked, it is not as frequently transmitted today as it once was. In fact, while an IVDA risks HIV and HCV, a large majority of the HCV population did not obtain it from this source. Sexual transmission is such a small number of cases, and usually is not documented as the only " risk factor " , that those victims are undocumentable to state that sexual transmission was the cause. In fact, there is a far higher risk using someone who has HCV, and using their toothbrush. then contracting the virus through sexual contact. In fact, the highest single risk factor for transmission lies in blood transfusion and blood by products. Today, some of the other main identified risks include: tattoo's, body piercings, accidental needle sticks, and the like. For an unknown reason, Veterans and Fire Fighters seem to have a disproportionate number of infections, and the epidemiology has not been established. I hope that you will add, or rewrite your article, because you are in a position to help the hundreds of thousands of already infected victims, as well as to increase public awareness. If you would like detailed references on these and similar facts, I would be more than happy to assist in directing you to the latest research in this area, as well, as, I am sure many of your readers may be willing to share their stories with you. Sincerely, Schoen, ARNP, RN, MSN, MHA, MBA Letters to the Editor, The Times Valley Edition, 20000 Prairie St., Chatsworth Ca 91311 or via Internet to FAX: (818) 772-3385 Valley Edition Phone: (818) 772-3200 Janet Clayton Janet Clayton, Editor of the Editorial Pages " Hep C, Thriving on Ignorance " Hepatitis C, a blood-borne, potentially fatal liver disease spread mostly by sexual contact and intravenous drug use, has become an underrecognized epidemic in California, afflicting an estimated half-million residents in Riverside County, 24% of jail inmates test positive, and a soon-to-be-released study from the state's Health and Human Services Agency is expected to show that fully one-third of all convicts entering state prisons have the virus. Unlike for the better-understood hepatitis A and B, there is no vaccine for hepatitis C. The disease often leads to liver failure if not treated. That's an increasingly common occurrence, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control (CDC), which said that 70% of those infected don't even realize they have the disease because symptoms often don't appear for years, long after liver damage begins. That's why early detection and public education are so critical to reining in the epidemic. State health officials should start by testing, counseling and treating accessible populations with the high infection rate. These include: *Drug users in needle exchange programs. The CDC urges that all " persons who ever injected illegal drugs, including those who injected once or a few times many years ago " should get tested. However, most needle exchange programs in California do not give out any information on hep C, much less urge participants to get tested. *Patients in veterans hospitals. A study last year of 26,000 patients in Department of Veterans Affairs facilities found that nearly 8% tested positive for hepatitis C. Among Vietnam War vets seeking medical help at VA facilities, the rate was substantially higher. In California, 140,000 veterans may be infected. The Clinton administration has asked Congress to give the VA $340 million next year to test and treat veterans with the hep C. That's $145 million more than what Congress allocated last year. Unfortunately, the VA has been slow to take advantage of the federal help. Last week, American Liver Assn. President Alan Brownstein told Congress that " the Department of Veterans Affairs has consistently underspent " it's hepatitis C prevention and treatment dollars. *Prisioners: In California, at the minimum, state prisons should determine the overall incidence of hepatitis C, not just the rates among newly arrived prisoners. The disease is little recognized outside high-risk groups, but its public health costs are growing. According to the American Liver Assn., the waiting list of potential liver recipients has more than tripled in the last five years, mostly because of chronic liver failures brought on by hepatitis C. Because the disease is " silent " for so long, the true rate of infection is not known. It is certain, however, that without better public education and testing, hepatitis C will continue to spread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.