Guest guest Posted February 17, 2008 Report Share Posted February 17, 2008 As the writer of this article says "better take a closer look who holds the needle" http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/vaccinate.html Pringle sums it up : "Forcing parents to inject poisonous concoctions into innocent, helpless children against their will is a gross violation of their most basic parental rights. " http://www.laleva.org/eng/2008/02/time_to_end_profit_driven_mandatory_vaccination_racket.html Ingrid There is a pretty good Push to dis-allow the philosophical and religeous exemptions in all states, leaving only a medical exemption, signed by a doctor, to get out of vaccines. And these would be harder to prove or get. I hope this does not happen. Damn the AMA, and other's, on these human rights issues. http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/pf_new/pf_online?f_n=resultLink & doc=policyfiles/HnE/H-440.970.HTM & s_t=H-440.970 & catg=AMA/HnE & catg=AMA/BnGnC & catg=AMA/DIR & & nth=1 & & st_p=0 & nth=1 http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/consent.htm Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2008 Report Share Posted February 17, 2008 As the writer of this article says "better take a closer look who holds the needle" http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/vaccinate.html Pringle sums it up : "Forcing parents to inject poisonous concoctions into innocent, helpless children against their will is a gross violation of their most basic parental rights. " http://www.laleva.org/eng/2008/02/time_to_end_profit_driven_mandatory_vaccination_racket.html Ingrid There is a pretty good Push to dis-allow the philosophical and religeous exemptions in all states, leaving only a medical exemption, signed by a doctor, to get out of vaccines. And these would be harder to prove or get. I hope this does not happen. Damn the AMA, and other's, on these human rights issues. http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/pf_new/pf_online?f_n=resultLink & doc=policyfiles/HnE/H-440.970.HTM & s_t=H-440.970 & catg=AMA/HnE & catg=AMA/BnGnC & catg=AMA/DIR & & nth=1 & & st_p=0 & nth=1 http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/consent.htm Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2008 Report Share Posted February 17, 2008 As the writer of this article says "better take a closer look who holds the needle" http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/vaccinate.html Pringle sums it up : "Forcing parents to inject poisonous concoctions into innocent, helpless children against their will is a gross violation of their most basic parental rights. " http://www.laleva.org/eng/2008/02/time_to_end_profit_driven_mandatory_vaccination_racket.html Ingrid There is a pretty good Push to dis-allow the philosophical and religeous exemptions in all states, leaving only a medical exemption, signed by a doctor, to get out of vaccines. And these would be harder to prove or get. I hope this does not happen. Damn the AMA, and other's, on these human rights issues. http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/pf_new/pf_online?f_n=resultLink & doc=policyfiles/HnE/H-440.970.HTM & s_t=H-440.970 & catg=AMA/HnE & catg=AMA/BnGnC & catg=AMA/DIR & & nth=1 & & st_p=0 & nth=1 http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/consent.htm Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2008 Report Share Posted February 17, 2008 As the writer of this article says "better take a closer look who holds the needle" http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/vaccinate.html Pringle sums it up : "Forcing parents to inject poisonous concoctions into innocent, helpless children against their will is a gross violation of their most basic parental rights. " http://www.laleva.org/eng/2008/02/time_to_end_profit_driven_mandatory_vaccination_racket.html Ingrid There is a pretty good Push to dis-allow the philosophical and religeous exemptions in all states, leaving only a medical exemption, signed by a doctor, to get out of vaccines. And these would be harder to prove or get. I hope this does not happen. Damn the AMA, and other's, on these human rights issues. http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/pf_new/pf_online?f_n=resultLink & doc=policyfiles/HnE/H-440.970.HTM & s_t=H-440.970 & catg=AMA/HnE & catg=AMA/BnGnC & catg=AMA/DIR & & nth=1 & & st_p=0 & nth=1 http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/consent.htm Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 States are not required to offer religious and philosophical exemptions, which makes it a wonder that so many do, frankly. Parts of NC have had substantial increases in exemptions in recent times, no doubt a response to increased awareness of vaccine problems. This is likely happening elsewhere around the country as well. We can expect, in response, efforts to remove all non-medical exemptions, since it is not legally possible narrow current religious exemption rights (once a state offers a religious exemption, it has the full backing of the US Constitution), and a "narrower" philosophical exemption doesn't really make any sense...so they are really "all or nothing" propositions. (Medical exemptions probably are required by the Constitution...) Rights are seldom stagnant; they are either expanding or contracting. We need to be actively involved at all times seeking to expand current exemption rights, or else by default we will be faced with defending against contracting rights. We are either on the offense or the defense at any given moment. Apathy and procrastination will lead by default to being on the defense. I think it preferable and more advantageous to be on the offense. So, we need to be organizing in support of the growing awareness movement, taking proactive steps to expand current vaccine rights, whatever they may be in any given state or jurisdiction, until mandates are removed everywhere. Alan G. , Esq.P.O. Box 3473Chapel Hill, NC 27515-3473919-960-5172www.alanphillipslaw.comwww.vaccinerights.com Sickening There is a pretty good Push to dis-allow the philosophical and religeous exemptions in all states, leaving only a medical exemption, signed by a doctor, to get out of vaccines. And these would be harder to prove or get. I hope this does not happen. Damn the AMA, and other's, on these human rights issues. http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/pf_new/pf_online?f_n=resultLink & doc=policyfiles/HnE/H-440.970.HTM & s_t=H-440.970 & catg=AMA/HnE & catg=AMA/BnGnC & catg=AMA/DIR & & nth=1 & & st_p=0 & nth=1 http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/consent.htm Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 States are not required to offer religious and philosophical exemptions, which makes it a wonder that so many do, frankly. Parts of NC have had substantial increases in exemptions in recent times, no doubt a response to increased awareness of vaccine problems. This is likely happening elsewhere around the country as well. We can expect, in response, efforts to remove all non-medical exemptions, since it is not legally possible narrow current religious exemption rights (once a state offers a religious exemption, it has the full backing of the US Constitution), and a "narrower" philosophical exemption doesn't really make any sense...so they are really "all or nothing" propositions. (Medical exemptions probably are required by the Constitution...) Rights are seldom stagnant; they are either expanding or contracting. We need to be actively involved at all times seeking to expand current exemption rights, or else by default we will be faced with defending against contracting rights. We are either on the offense or the defense at any given moment. Apathy and procrastination will lead by default to being on the defense. I think it preferable and more advantageous to be on the offense. So, we need to be organizing in support of the growing awareness movement, taking proactive steps to expand current vaccine rights, whatever they may be in any given state or jurisdiction, until mandates are removed everywhere. Alan G. , Esq.P.O. Box 3473Chapel Hill, NC 27515-3473919-960-5172www.alanphillipslaw.comwww.vaccinerights.com Sickening There is a pretty good Push to dis-allow the philosophical and religeous exemptions in all states, leaving only a medical exemption, signed by a doctor, to get out of vaccines. And these would be harder to prove or get. I hope this does not happen. Damn the AMA, and other's, on these human rights issues. http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/pf_new/pf_online?f_n=resultLink & doc=policyfiles/HnE/H-440.970.HTM & s_t=H-440.970 & catg=AMA/HnE & catg=AMA/BnGnC & catg=AMA/DIR & & nth=1 & & st_p=0 & nth=1 http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/consent.htm Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 States are not required to offer religious and philosophical exemptions, which makes it a wonder that so many do, frankly. Parts of NC have had substantial increases in exemptions in recent times, no doubt a response to increased awareness of vaccine problems. This is likely happening elsewhere around the country as well. We can expect, in response, efforts to remove all non-medical exemptions, since it is not legally possible narrow current religious exemption rights (once a state offers a religious exemption, it has the full backing of the US Constitution), and a "narrower" philosophical exemption doesn't really make any sense...so they are really "all or nothing" propositions. (Medical exemptions probably are required by the Constitution...) Rights are seldom stagnant; they are either expanding or contracting. We need to be actively involved at all times seeking to expand current exemption rights, or else by default we will be faced with defending against contracting rights. We are either on the offense or the defense at any given moment. Apathy and procrastination will lead by default to being on the defense. I think it preferable and more advantageous to be on the offense. So, we need to be organizing in support of the growing awareness movement, taking proactive steps to expand current vaccine rights, whatever they may be in any given state or jurisdiction, until mandates are removed everywhere. Alan G. , Esq.P.O. Box 3473Chapel Hill, NC 27515-3473919-960-5172www.alanphillipslaw.comwww.vaccinerights.com Sickening There is a pretty good Push to dis-allow the philosophical and religeous exemptions in all states, leaving only a medical exemption, signed by a doctor, to get out of vaccines. And these would be harder to prove or get. I hope this does not happen. Damn the AMA, and other's, on these human rights issues. http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/pf_new/pf_online?f_n=resultLink & doc=policyfiles/HnE/H-440.970.HTM & s_t=H-440.970 & catg=AMA/HnE & catg=AMA/BnGnC & catg=AMA/DIR & & nth=1 & & st_p=0 & nth=1 http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/consent.htm Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 States are not required to offer religious and philosophical exemptions, which makes it a wonder that so many do, frankly. Parts of NC have had substantial increases in exemptions in recent times, no doubt a response to increased awareness of vaccine problems. This is likely happening elsewhere around the country as well. We can expect, in response, efforts to remove all non-medical exemptions, since it is not legally possible narrow current religious exemption rights (once a state offers a religious exemption, it has the full backing of the US Constitution), and a "narrower" philosophical exemption doesn't really make any sense...so they are really "all or nothing" propositions. (Medical exemptions probably are required by the Constitution...) Rights are seldom stagnant; they are either expanding or contracting. We need to be actively involved at all times seeking to expand current exemption rights, or else by default we will be faced with defending against contracting rights. We are either on the offense or the defense at any given moment. Apathy and procrastination will lead by default to being on the defense. I think it preferable and more advantageous to be on the offense. So, we need to be organizing in support of the growing awareness movement, taking proactive steps to expand current vaccine rights, whatever they may be in any given state or jurisdiction, until mandates are removed everywhere. Alan G. , Esq.P.O. Box 3473Chapel Hill, NC 27515-3473919-960-5172www.alanphillipslaw.comwww.vaccinerights.com Sickening There is a pretty good Push to dis-allow the philosophical and religeous exemptions in all states, leaving only a medical exemption, signed by a doctor, to get out of vaccines. And these would be harder to prove or get. I hope this does not happen. Damn the AMA, and other's, on these human rights issues. http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/pf_new/pf_online?f_n=resultLink & doc=policyfiles/HnE/H-440.970.HTM & s_t=H-440.970 & catg=AMA/HnE & catg=AMA/BnGnC & catg=AMA/DIR & & nth=1 & & st_p=0 & nth=1 http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/consent.htm Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Well said, thank you. -Shayne Fisher > > States are not required to offer religious and philosophical exemptions, which makes it a wonder that so many do, frankly. Parts of NC have had substantial increases in exemptions in recent times, no doubt a response to increased awareness of vaccine problems. This is likely happening elsewhere around the country as well. We can expect, in response, efforts to remove all non-medical exemptions, since it is not legally possible narrow current religious exemption rights (once a state offers a religious exemption, it has the full backing of the US Constitution), and a " narrower " philosophical exemption doesn't really make any sense...so they are really " all or nothing " propositions. (Medical exemptions probably are required by the Constitution...) > > Rights are seldom stagnant; they are either expanding or contracting. We need to be actively involved at all times seeking to expand current exemption rights, or else by default we will be faced with defending against contracting rights. We are either on the offense or the defense at any given moment. Apathy and procrastination will lead by default to being on the defense. I think it preferable and more advantageous to be on the offense. So, we need to be organizing in support of the growing awareness movement, taking proactive steps to expand current vaccine rights, whatever they may be in any given state or jurisdiction, until mandates are removed everywhere. > > Alan G. , Esq. > P.O. Box 3473 > Chapel Hill, NC 27515-3473 > 919-960-5172 > www.alanphillipslaw.com > www.vaccinerights.com > > Sickening > > > > There is a pretty good Push to dis-allow the philosophical and religeous exemptions in all states, leaving only a medical exemption, signed by a doctor, to get out of vaccines. And these would be harder to prove or get. I hope this does not happen. Damn the AMA, and other's, on these human rights issues. > > http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/pf_new/pf_online? f_n=resultLink & doc=policyfiles/HnE/H-440.970.HTM & s_t=H- 440.970 & catg=AMA/HnE & catg=AMA/BnGnC & catg=AMA/DIR & & nth=1 & & st_p=0 & nth=1 > > > http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/consent.htm > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Well said, thank you. -Shayne Fisher > > States are not required to offer religious and philosophical exemptions, which makes it a wonder that so many do, frankly. Parts of NC have had substantial increases in exemptions in recent times, no doubt a response to increased awareness of vaccine problems. This is likely happening elsewhere around the country as well. We can expect, in response, efforts to remove all non-medical exemptions, since it is not legally possible narrow current religious exemption rights (once a state offers a religious exemption, it has the full backing of the US Constitution), and a " narrower " philosophical exemption doesn't really make any sense...so they are really " all or nothing " propositions. (Medical exemptions probably are required by the Constitution...) > > Rights are seldom stagnant; they are either expanding or contracting. We need to be actively involved at all times seeking to expand current exemption rights, or else by default we will be faced with defending against contracting rights. We are either on the offense or the defense at any given moment. Apathy and procrastination will lead by default to being on the defense. I think it preferable and more advantageous to be on the offense. So, we need to be organizing in support of the growing awareness movement, taking proactive steps to expand current vaccine rights, whatever they may be in any given state or jurisdiction, until mandates are removed everywhere. > > Alan G. , Esq. > P.O. Box 3473 > Chapel Hill, NC 27515-3473 > 919-960-5172 > www.alanphillipslaw.com > www.vaccinerights.com > > Sickening > > > > There is a pretty good Push to dis-allow the philosophical and religeous exemptions in all states, leaving only a medical exemption, signed by a doctor, to get out of vaccines. And these would be harder to prove or get. I hope this does not happen. Damn the AMA, and other's, on these human rights issues. > > http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/pf_new/pf_online? f_n=resultLink & doc=policyfiles/HnE/H-440.970.HTM & s_t=H- 440.970 & catg=AMA/HnE & catg=AMA/BnGnC & catg=AMA/DIR & & nth=1 & & st_p=0 & nth=1 > > > http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/consent.htm > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 I CONCUR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!karla walsh <faerie1952@...> wrote: There is a pretty good Push to dis-allow the philosophical and religeous exemptions in all states, leaving only a medical exemption, signed by a doctor, to get out of vaccines. And these would be harder to prove or get. I hope this does not happen. Damn the AMA, and other's, on these human rights issues. http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/pf_new/pf_online?f_n=resultLink & doc=policyfiles/HnE/H-440.970.HTM & s_t=H-440.970 & catg=AMA/HnE & catg=AMA/BnGnC & catg=AMA/DIR & & nth=1 & & st_p=0 & nth=1 http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/consent.htm Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 I CONCUR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!karla walsh <faerie1952@...> wrote: There is a pretty good Push to dis-allow the philosophical and religeous exemptions in all states, leaving only a medical exemption, signed by a doctor, to get out of vaccines. And these would be harder to prove or get. I hope this does not happen. Damn the AMA, and other's, on these human rights issues. http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/pf_new/pf_online?f_n=resultLink & doc=policyfiles/HnE/H-440.970.HTM & s_t=H-440.970 & catg=AMA/HnE & catg=AMA/BnGnC & catg=AMA/DIR & & nth=1 & & st_p=0 & nth=1 http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/consent.htm Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2010 Report Share Posted October 5, 2010 That’s right – and the ones behind the “Push” for fewer medical freedoms are the pharmaceutical companies, of course. But what you may NOT know is that Obama is totally in bed with the Big Pharma elite, and had arrangements all worked out with them, before the so-called health care bill ever hit the Floor! From: no-forced-vaccination [mailto:no-forced-vaccination ] On Behalf Of karla walsh Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 8:55 PM no-forced-vaccination Subject: Sickening There is a pretty good Push to dis-allow the philosophical and religeous exemptions in all states, leaving only a medical exemption, signed by a doctor, to get out of vaccines. And these would be harder to prove or get. I hope this does not happen. Damn the AMA, and other's, on these human rights issues. http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/pf_new/pf_online?f_n=resultLink & doc=policyfiles/HnE/H-440.970.HTM & s_t=H-440.970 & catg=AMA/HnE & catg=AMA/BnGnC & catg=AMA/DIR & & nth=1 & & st_p=0 & nth=1 http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/consent.htm Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2010 Report Share Posted October 5, 2010 That’s right – and the ones behind the “Push” for fewer medical freedoms are the pharmaceutical companies, of course. But what you may NOT know is that Obama is totally in bed with the Big Pharma elite, and had arrangements all worked out with them, before the so-called health care bill ever hit the Floor! From: no-forced-vaccination [mailto:no-forced-vaccination ] On Behalf Of karla walsh Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 8:55 PM no-forced-vaccination Subject: Sickening There is a pretty good Push to dis-allow the philosophical and religeous exemptions in all states, leaving only a medical exemption, signed by a doctor, to get out of vaccines. And these would be harder to prove or get. I hope this does not happen. Damn the AMA, and other's, on these human rights issues. http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/pf_new/pf_online?f_n=resultLink & doc=policyfiles/HnE/H-440.970.HTM & s_t=H-440.970 & catg=AMA/HnE & catg=AMA/BnGnC & catg=AMA/DIR & & nth=1 & & st_p=0 & nth=1 http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/consent.htm Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.