Re: Emails from CDC and FDA on Vaccines and Mercury

[Guest guest]

Thanks for providing this information.

I've checked a bit to see whether the 3 mcg per vaccination is really

just a trace amount.

Here is one comment:

" Most worryingly, exposure levels were not particularly high. Hair

concentrations in the villagers averaged 4 micrograms of mercury per

gram of hair. This is just a tenth of the level considered dangerous

for adults by the World Health Organization, and not much higher than

that found in many countries. In the US and Japan, for instance, the

average mercury concentration in hair is around 1 and 2 micrograms per

gram respectively. "

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-06/ns-esm061103.php

According to the New York Times on April 5, 2003,

" The Food and Drug Administration has begun using the Environmental

Protection Agency's much lower safe level for mercury in the human

body, an official of the food and drug agency said this week.

" Before the change, the F.D.A. guidelines set a safe level that was

four times as high as that of the environmental agency's standard. "

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health & res=9507EFDD1538F936A35757\

C0A9659C8B63

This information suggests the FDA may still be allowing dangerous

" trace " levels of mercury in vaccines.

Ralph Fucetola JD

>

> http://www.ageofautism.com/2007/12/emails-from-cdc.html

>

[Guest guest]

Thanks for providing this information.

I've checked a bit to see whether the 3 mcg per vaccination is really

just a trace amount.

Here is one comment:

" Most worryingly, exposure levels were not particularly high. Hair

concentrations in the villagers averaged 4 micrograms of mercury per

gram of hair. This is just a tenth of the level considered dangerous

for adults by the World Health Organization, and not much higher than

that found in many countries. In the US and Japan, for instance, the

average mercury concentration in hair is around 1 and 2 micrograms per

gram respectively. "

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-06/ns-esm061103.php

According to the New York Times on April 5, 2003,

" The Food and Drug Administration has begun using the Environmental

Protection Agency's much lower safe level for mercury in the human

body, an official of the food and drug agency said this week.

" Before the change, the F.D.A. guidelines set a safe level that was

four times as high as that of the environmental agency's standard. "

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health & res=9507EFDD1538F936A35757\

C0A9659C8B63

This information suggests the FDA may still be allowing dangerous

" trace " levels of mercury in vaccines.

Ralph Fucetola JD

>

> http://www.ageofautism.com/2007/12/emails-from-cdc.html

>

[Guest guest]

Current EPA " safe " level of mercury is .1 mcg/kg per day - one-tenth

of a microgram.

Of course, the FDA has never done the necessary studies to see how

ethyl mercury differs and whether it's more toxic. But if we assume

the .1 applies to all types of mercury, then a trace of 3 mcg is way

over the limit.

>

> Thanks for providing this information.

>

> I've checked a bit to see whether the 3 mcg per vaccination is

really

> just a trace amount.

>

> Here is one comment:

>

> " Most worryingly, exposure levels were not particularly high. Hair

> concentrations in the villagers averaged 4 micrograms of mercury per

> gram of hair. This is just a tenth of the level considered dangerous

> for adults by the World Health Organization, and not much higher

than

> that found in many countries. In the US and Japan, for instance, the

> average mercury concentration in hair is around 1 and 2 micrograms

per

> gram respectively. "

>

> http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-06/ns-esm061103.php

>

> According to the New York Times on April 5, 2003,

>

> " The Food and Drug Administration has begun using the Environmental

> Protection Agency's much lower safe level for mercury in the human

> body, an official of the food and drug agency said this week.

>

> " Before the change, the F.D.A. guidelines set a safe level that was

> four times as high as that of the environmental agency's standard. "

>

> http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?

sec=health & res=9507EFDD1538F936A35757C0A9659C8B63

>

>

> This information suggests the FDA may still be allowing dangerous

> " trace " levels of mercury in vaccines.

>

> Ralph Fucetola JD

>

>

>

> >

> > http://www.ageofautism.com/2007/12/emails-from-cdc.html

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Current EPA " safe " level of mercury is .1 mcg/kg per day - one-tenth

of a microgram.

Of course, the FDA has never done the necessary studies to see how

ethyl mercury differs and whether it's more toxic. But if we assume

the .1 applies to all types of mercury, then a trace of 3 mcg is way

over the limit.

>

> Thanks for providing this information.

>

> I've checked a bit to see whether the 3 mcg per vaccination is

really

> just a trace amount.

>

> Here is one comment:

>

> " Most worryingly, exposure levels were not particularly high. Hair

> concentrations in the villagers averaged 4 micrograms of mercury per

> gram of hair. This is just a tenth of the level considered dangerous

> for adults by the World Health Organization, and not much higher

than

> that found in many countries. In the US and Japan, for instance, the

> average mercury concentration in hair is around 1 and 2 micrograms

per

> gram respectively. "

>

> http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-06/ns-esm061103.php

>

> According to the New York Times on April 5, 2003,

>

> " The Food and Drug Administration has begun using the Environmental

> Protection Agency's much lower safe level for mercury in the human

> body, an official of the food and drug agency said this week.

>

> " Before the change, the F.D.A. guidelines set a safe level that was

> four times as high as that of the environmental agency's standard. "

>

> http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?

sec=health & res=9507EFDD1538F936A35757C0A9659C8B63

>

>

> This information suggests the FDA may still be allowing dangerous

> " trace " levels of mercury in vaccines.

>

> Ralph Fucetola JD

>

>

>

> >

> > http://www.ageofautism.com/2007/12/emails-from-cdc.html

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Mercury isn't " safe " at any level. Well, I take that back;

you need the most minute amount each day, but you also need

a minute amount of arsenic. That doesn't mean you will

purposefully take arsenic. It boils down to what is

" toxic. " There is a HUGE difference and truly " safe " and

" toxic " levels.

Consider this comparison: The FDA puts out guidelines on the

Minimum Daily Requirement for vitamins and minerals. By

" Minimum Daily Requirement " they mean the minimum to keep

you alive, not all you need for the day. In other words,

if you don't get that much, your body will not function

properly, it doesn't mean it is enough to keep you healthy.

The information you receive from the FDA is misleading most

of the time. You must be able to discern between what they

are saying and what they mean. That is not always easy, but

in most cases, they are playing word games with the public.

Blessings,

Dr. Lynda Hardin-Poston

5109 Stotzer Pwy.

College Station, TX 77845

(979)260-1202

drlynda@...

Http://www.doctorlynda.com

Health, God's Way

> >

> > http://www.ageofautism.com/2007/12/emails-from-cdc.html

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Mercury isn't " safe " at any level. Well, I take that back;

you need the most minute amount each day, but you also need

a minute amount of arsenic. That doesn't mean you will

purposefully take arsenic. It boils down to what is

" toxic. " There is a HUGE difference and truly " safe " and

" toxic " levels.

Consider this comparison: The FDA puts out guidelines on the

Minimum Daily Requirement for vitamins and minerals. By

" Minimum Daily Requirement " they mean the minimum to keep

you alive, not all you need for the day. In other words,

if you don't get that much, your body will not function

properly, it doesn't mean it is enough to keep you healthy.

The information you receive from the FDA is misleading most

of the time. You must be able to discern between what they

are saying and what they mean. That is not always easy, but

in most cases, they are playing word games with the public.

Blessings,

Dr. Lynda Hardin-Poston

5109 Stotzer Pwy.

College Station, TX 77845

(979)260-1202

drlynda@...

Http://www.doctorlynda.com

Health, God's Way

> >

> > http://www.ageofautism.com/2007/12/emails-from-cdc.html

> >

>