Guest guest Posted June 3, 2002 Report Share Posted June 3, 2002 In a message dated 6/2/02 5:12:27 PM, writes: << But didn't the government redefine the terms " overweight " and " obese " several years ago? >> Yes they did -- but the percentages comparing the relative amount of obesity in the two time frames 1960 -80 and the past 20 years were based on the same obesity standard. The change in the definitions particularily affected the % of those now considered overweight. Obesity and overweight are not the same. Actually one doesn't need statistics at all the know that obesity is increasing -- a decent memory and a good set of eyes will do. I am particularly alarmed at the increasing number of obese children. It was so rare when I was a child and now I see them so often. A fellow named Bill Harlan who was one of the key players in the establishment of the low fat diet as public policy admits to being stunned: " Most of us would have predicted that if we can get the population to change its fat intake, with its dense calories, we would see a reduction in weight, " but " Instead, we see the exact opposite. " An excellent article about dietary fat: Taubes, G. The Soft Science of Dietary Fat Science Volume 291, Number 5513, Issue of 30 Mar 2001, pp. 2536-2545. I receive messages in digest form so I don't think I can attach the article but if you would like the article I have on my computer and would happily send it anyone who is interested -- just email me offline. Namaste, Liz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.