Guest guest Posted July 13, 2011 Report Share Posted July 13, 2011 http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/204/3/408.abstract?etoc Viral Determinants of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Seroclearance in Hepatitis B e Antigen–Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Henry Lik-Yuen Chan, Grace Lai-Hung Wong, Chi-Hang Tse, Hoi-Yun Chan and Wai-Sun Wong + Author Affiliations Department of Medicine and Therapeutics and Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Correspondence: Henry LY Chan, MD, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, 9/F Prince of Wales Hospital, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China (hlychan@...). Abstract Background. We studied whether quantification of serum HBsAg and HBV DNA levels could predict spontaneous HBsAg clearance in patients with negative hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg). Methods. Serum HBsAg and HBV DNA levels were measured at baseline among a longitudinal cohort of 103 HBeAg-negative patients recruited since 1997. Results. Twelve (12%) patients developed HBsAg seroclearance after 88 ± 26 months (range, 21–139) of follow-up. At baseline, the serum HBsAg level among patients who cleared HBsAg (1.30 ± 1.27 log IU/mL) was significantly lower than those who did not clear HBsAg (2.96 ± 0.84 log IU/mL; P < .001). The area under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for serum HBsAg to predict HBsAg seroclearance was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83–0.97; P < .001). Nine (75%) of 12 patients who had HBsAg seroclearance versus 8 (9%) of 91 who remained HBsAg-positive had serum HBsAg ≤100 IU/mL at the baseline (P < .001). An HBsAg cutoff of ≤100 IU/mL had 75% sensitivity and 91% specificity to predict HBsAg seroclearance. Baseline serum HBV DNA could not predict HBsAg seroclearance; the area under ROC curve was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.46–0.81; P = .13). Conclusions. Single-point serum HBsAg level can predict the chance of HBsAg seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B patients with negative HBeAg. Received November 14, 2010. Accepted March 28, 2011. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2011 Report Share Posted July 13, 2011 http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/204/3/408.abstract?etoc Viral Determinants of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Seroclearance in Hepatitis B e Antigen–Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Henry Lik-Yuen Chan, Grace Lai-Hung Wong, Chi-Hang Tse, Hoi-Yun Chan and Wai-Sun Wong + Author Affiliations Department of Medicine and Therapeutics and Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Correspondence: Henry LY Chan, MD, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, 9/F Prince of Wales Hospital, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China (hlychan@...). Abstract Background. We studied whether quantification of serum HBsAg and HBV DNA levels could predict spontaneous HBsAg clearance in patients with negative hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg). Methods. Serum HBsAg and HBV DNA levels were measured at baseline among a longitudinal cohort of 103 HBeAg-negative patients recruited since 1997. Results. Twelve (12%) patients developed HBsAg seroclearance after 88 ± 26 months (range, 21–139) of follow-up. At baseline, the serum HBsAg level among patients who cleared HBsAg (1.30 ± 1.27 log IU/mL) was significantly lower than those who did not clear HBsAg (2.96 ± 0.84 log IU/mL; P < .001). The area under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for serum HBsAg to predict HBsAg seroclearance was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83–0.97; P < .001). Nine (75%) of 12 patients who had HBsAg seroclearance versus 8 (9%) of 91 who remained HBsAg-positive had serum HBsAg ≤100 IU/mL at the baseline (P < .001). An HBsAg cutoff of ≤100 IU/mL had 75% sensitivity and 91% specificity to predict HBsAg seroclearance. Baseline serum HBV DNA could not predict HBsAg seroclearance; the area under ROC curve was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.46–0.81; P = .13). Conclusions. Single-point serum HBsAg level can predict the chance of HBsAg seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B patients with negative HBeAg. Received November 14, 2010. Accepted March 28, 2011. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.