Guest guest Posted July 3, 2002 Report Share Posted July 3, 2002 Heidi Schuppenhauer wrote: > At 11:24 PM 7/2/2002 -0700, you wrote: > >Heidi Schuppenhauer wrote: > > > > > Eggs are *supposed* to be sterile inside: something like 1 in 10,000 MAY be > > > contaminated. > > > >I heard 1 in 20,000. Don't know which is more accurate. > > > >Roman > > Me neither. But it's still an AWFULLY BIG number! I think most > salmonella poisoning comes from the shell ... > > Let's see -- if I ate an egg a day it would take me either 27 or 54 > years, on average, to come up with a contaminated one ... and > at that, there might not be enough bacteria to make me sick. > > Heidi And even if there were, you would probably not die but just feel ill unless you're very badly messed up, with no immune system left. A conclusion could be made that this risk is not worth worrying about and missing the goodness of raw eggs. Roman ------------------------------------------- Introducing NetZero Long Distance Unlimited Long Distance only $29.95/ month! Sign Up Today! www.netzerolongdistance.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.