Guest guest Posted July 28, 2002 Report Share Posted July 28, 2002 Hi Alan, This is just the tip of the legal iceburg. Wait until the public fully realizes how all the PUFA's and high grain diets, recommended by many, many doctors, nutritionists, the government, etc., etc. has led to their poor health. They won't know who to sue first. It's going to make the cigarette litigation look like a picnic. Yikes! Sheila > http://www.sptimes.com/2002/07/27/Worldandnation/Obese_man_sues_fast_f ..shtml > > You've just _got_ to love it! > > > AP > -- > Aviation is more than a hobby. It is more than a job. It is more than > a career. Aviation is a way of life. > A second language for the world: www.esperanto.com > Processor cycles are a terrible thing to waste: www.distributed.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2002 Report Share Posted July 28, 2002 I've been waiting years for this. I was certain it was bound to happen. Love it is putting it mildly. If I could dance a jig, I would. Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: Alan S. Petrillo Cypress Consultants ; Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 10:13 AM Subject: Obese Man Sues Fast Food Chains http://www.sptimes.com/2002/07/27/Worldandnation/Obese_man_sues_fast_f.shtml You've just _got_ to love it! AP -- Aviation is more than a hobby. It is more than a job. It is more than a career. Aviation is a way of life. A second language for the world: www.esperanto.com Processor cycles are a terrible thing to waste: www.distributed.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2002 Report Share Posted July 29, 2002 > > > I've been waiting years for this. I was certain it was bound to > > happen. Love it is putting it mildly. If I could dance a jig, I > > would. > > > Ed > > > > Ed, I certainly don't think it is time to celebrate. Although most of > > this groups is against fast food our choices may soon be affected. > > They are attacking fast food on the grounds that it is too high in > > fat, not that it is the wrong kind of fat or that it is full of sugar > > and white flour. That could be a problem for us. There is talk of > > taxing high fat foods, which of course would include butter (100% > > fat) or walnuts (90% fat), or chickens that are not skinless, and > > just about any meat that is more than 30% of calories from fat. I've > > already seen a poll where 36% of those polled where in favor of it. > > On the other hand, how many people here actually obtain their butter-- > which, by the way, is only about 80% fat--legally? 80% butterfat by weight. However, a one tablespoon serving of butter is 110 calories. It has 12 grams of fat, zero grams of protien, and zero grams of carbs. Therefore all calories are from fat. It is 100% of calories from fat. That is the measure the " food police " use to determine a food is healthy. That is how I get the figure for walnuts. A one 1/4 cup (29 gram) serving is 20 grams of fat, 200 calories, 4 grams of carbs, 5 grams of protien. If you go by weight by weight we have: 20 grams = 68.96% by weight of fat. 4 grams = 13.79 % by weight of carbs 5 grams = 17.24% by weight of protien 20 grams of fat x 9 calories per gram = 180 calories. Which is 90% of 200 calories from fat. > Do you remember where you saw the poll? It's not that I can't believe that > 36% of the people in this country would be foolish enough to support such a > tax, but political organizations do have a habit of designing and > conducting their polls in such a way as to bias the results in their favor. It was an on-line poll. I believe it was Netscape. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2002 Report Share Posted July 29, 2002 In a message dated 7/28/02 2:22:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time, h2ocolor@... writes: > This is just the tip of the legal iceburg. Wait until the public > fully realizes how all the PUFA's and high grain diets, recommended > by many, many doctors, nutritionists, the government, etc., etc. has > led to their poor health What are PUFAs? chris ____ " What can one say of a soul, of a heart, filled with compassion? It is a heart which burns with love for every creature: for human beings, birds, and animals, for serpents and for demons. The thought of them and the sight of them make the tears of the saint flow. And this immense and intense compassion, which flows from the heart of the saints, makes them unable to bear the sight of the smallest, most insignificant wound in any creature. Thus they pray ceaselessly, with tears, even for animals, for enemies of the truth, and for those who do them wrong. " --Saint Isaac the Syrian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2002 Report Share Posted July 29, 2002 > This is just the tip of the legal iceburg. Wait until the public > fully realizes how all the PUFA's and high grain diets, recommended > by many, many doctors, nutritionists, the government, etc., etc. has > led to their poor health What are PUFAs? --->Poly Unsaturated Fatty Acids - those with more than one double bond. EFAs are PUFAs, for example, as they have from two to six double bonds. Suze Fisher Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg/ mailto:s.fisher22@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2002 Report Share Posted July 29, 2002 I agree. Let people become educated, not scream for laws. The more we cry for control, the more we scream lawsuit, the more laws are set down. This give more and more power to the FDA, who in turn will have even more control over what we can and cannot have. Is that what you want? Do you trust that the FDA will make decisions based on your health and your rights to healthy products? Do they have a past track record of doing what is in your best interest? I for one hope this is thrown out of court. Let people take responsibility for their own lives, and let us choose what we want to buy and to eat. Kat http://www.katking.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Idol Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 8:09 PM Subject: Re: Re: Obese Man Sues Fast Food Chains - >On a tangentially related note, I'd like to plug Stossel's upcoming >report on the War on Drugs, which will air this Tuesday on ABC at 10:00 PM. >This should give you a pretty good idea of what the War on Fat will look >like thirty years from now if all goes according to plan. We can hope, though, that the current nascent reversal in public opinion about fat will continue to grow and topple the low-fat doctrine. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2002 Report Share Posted July 29, 2002 http://www.sptimes.com/2002/07/27/Worldandnation/Obese_man_sues_fast_f.shtml You've just _got_ to love it! AP -- Aviation is more than a hobby. It is more than a job. It is more than a career. Aviation is a way of life. A second language for the world: www.esperanto.com Processor cycles are a terrible thing to waste: www.distributed.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2002 Report Share Posted July 29, 2002 Well I really think it is both, not one or the other. People definitely need to become educated however if there is one thing that I would like to see come out of these law suits is a law that says producers have to tell the truth about what is in their products. For example food producers say it is none of our business if their products contain GMOs so now there is no labelling so the consumer has no way of knowing which products do and which don't. The fast food industry may tell us how much fat and sugar is in their burgers but can we get other information like what additives are in the product? You can't get educated and make good choices if the information is not available or if the producers lie about their products. There is responsibility on both sides of the issue but it is always the consumer's responsibility that is the focus. Irene At 07:02 AM 7/29/02, you wrote: >I agree. Let people become educated, not scream for laws. > >The more we cry for control, the more we scream lawsuit, the more laws are >set down. > >This give more and more power to the FDA, who in turn will have even more >control over what we can and cannot have. Is that what you want? Do you >trust that the FDA will make decisions based on your health and your >rights to healthy products? Do they have a past track record of doing >what is in your best interest? > >I for one hope this is thrown out of court. Let people take >responsibility for their own lives, and let us choose what we want to buy >and to eat. > >Kat ><http://www.katking.com>http://www.katking.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Idol > > Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 8:09 PM > Subject: Re: Re: Obese Man Sues Fast Food Chains > > > - > > >On a tangentially related note, I'd like to plug Stossel's upcoming > >report on the War on Drugs, which will air this Tuesday on ABC at > 10:00 PM. > >This should give you a pretty good idea of what the War on Fat will look > >like thirty years from now if all goes according to plan. > > We can hope, though, that the current nascent reversal in public opinion > about fat will continue to grow and topple the low-fat doctrine. > > > > > - > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2002 Report Share Posted July 29, 2002 Alec, I agree that the suit against the fast food chains is for the wrong reasons, but I think that, when lawyers start looking for reasons to sue those wrecking our health, they will start questioning the eat-fat-makes-you fat theory. At least, that's my hope. Ed- ---- Original Message ----- From: alecwood Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 6:58 PM Subject: Re: Obese Man Sues Fast Food Chains > I've been waiting years for this. I was certain it was bound to happen. Love it is putting it mildly. If I could dance a jig, I would. > Ed Ed, I certainly don't think it is time to celebrate. Although most of this groups is against fast food our choices may soon be affected. They are attacking fast food on the grounds that it is too high in fat, not that it is the wrong kind of fat or that it is full of sugar and white flour. That could be a problem for us. There is talk of taxing high fat foods, which of course would include butter (100% fat) or walnuts (90% fat), or chickens that are not skinless, and just about any meat that is more than 30% of calories from fat. I've already seen a poll where 36% of those polled where in favor of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2002 Report Share Posted July 29, 2002 In a message dated 7/29/02 1:03:33 AM Eastern Daylight Time, bill@... writes: > It was an on-line poll. I believe it was Netscape. online polls are worthless. thank heavens! chris ____ " What can one say of a soul, of a heart, filled with compassion? It is a heart which burns with love for every creature: for human beings, birds, and animals, for serpents and for demons. The thought of them and the sight of them make the tears of the saint flow. And this immense and intense compassion, which flows from the heart of the saints, makes them unable to bear the sight of the smallest, most insignificant wound in any creature. Thus they pray ceaselessly, with tears, even for animals, for enemies of the truth, and for those who do them wrong. " --Saint Isaac the Syrian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2002 Report Share Posted July 30, 2002 I agree we should become educated not scream for laws, but the trouble is that the giant conglomerates that dominate the country now have an iron grip on the media. That's why Price is never mentioned in the media. His ideas will destroy the profits of huge businesses, such as the producers of junk food, the fast food restaurants, the agribusinesses that have destroyed most of our small farmers, etc. I hope some law suits will curb the junk food producers the way law suits have curbed the tobacco industry. Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: Katanne1890 Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 10:02 AM Subject: Re: Re: Obese Man Sues Fast Food Chains I agree. Let people become educated, not scream for laws. The more we cry for control, the more we scream lawsuit, the more laws are set down. This give more and more power to the FDA, who in turn will have even more control over what we can and cannot have. Is that what you want? Do you trust that the FDA will make decisions based on your health and your rights to healthy products? Do they have a past track record of doing what is in your best interest? I for one hope this is thrown out of court. Let people take responsibility for their own lives, and let us choose what we want to buy and to eat. Kat http://www.katking.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Idol Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 8:09 PM Subject: Re: Re: Obese Man Sues Fast Food Chains - >On a tangentially related note, I'd like to plug Stossel's upcoming >report on the War on Drugs, which will air this Tuesday on ABC at 10:00 PM. >This should give you a pretty good idea of what the War on Fat will look >like thirty years from now if all goes according to plan. We can hope, though, that the current nascent reversal in public opinion about fat will continue to grow and topple the low-fat doctrine. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2002 Report Share Posted July 30, 2002 Hi Ed, That's true, but have you EVER met anyone who really believed that fast food was actually nutritious? " The giant conglomerates that dominate the country now have an iron grip on the media " would love for us to put up a stink so they can be " humanitarian " and fix the problem with more laws. Yeah! FDA to the rescue again. If we want to make reforms, we need to begin in the schools. Have you ever noticed what they feed the kids? And they teach the kids this food is nutritious. Or, how about educating the hospitals? They are notorious for bad food. Seems they don't think nutrition is important when ill or injured. How about trying to educate the doctors? Many seem to believe that the only deficiency women have are hormones, Prozac, and valium. On the other hand, I have met people who were told that if they did not change their diet they would die, and they refused to give up their foods...and they died. Again, personal choice and responsibility. The job looks overwhelming, so what do I do. My best, and hope it is an example that others will want to follow. Kat http://www.katking.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Darmohray Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 6:44 PM Subject: Re: Re: Obese Man Sues Fast Food Chains I agree we should become educated not scream for laws, but the trouble is that the giant conglomerates that dominate the country now have an iron grip on the media. That's why Price is never mentioned in the media. His ideas will destroy the profits of huge businesses, such as the producers of junk food, the fast food restaurants, the agribusinesses that have destroyed most of our small farmers, etc. I hope some law suits will curb the junk food producers the way law suits have curbed the tobacco industry. Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: Katanne1890 Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 10:02 AM Subject: Re: Re: Obese Man Sues Fast Food Chains I agree. Let people become educated, not scream for laws. The more we cry for control, the more we scream lawsuit, the more laws are set down. This give more and more power to the FDA, who in turn will have even more control over what we can and cannot have. Is that what you want? Do you trust that the FDA will make decisions based on your health and your rights to healthy products? Do they have a past track record of doing what is in your best interest? I for one hope this is thrown out of court. Let people take responsibility for their own lives, and let us choose what we want to buy and to eat. Kat http://www.katking.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Idol Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 8:09 PM Subject: Re: Re: Obese Man Sues Fast Food Chains - >On a tangentially related note, I'd like to plug Stossel's upcoming >report on the War on Drugs, which will air this Tuesday on ABC at 10:00 PM. >This should give you a pretty good idea of what the War on Fat will look >like thirty years from now if all goes according to plan. We can hope, though, that the current nascent reversal in public opinion about fat will continue to grow and topple the low-fat doctrine. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2002 Report Share Posted July 30, 2002 Hi Kat, I agree entirely that we need to educated children, the doctors, etc. But the media plays a major role in shaping public opinion, and we have a free press in name only. By that I mean, the gov can't control the media, but the owners can, and they're the giant conglomerates who are poisoning people with their junk food and junk meds. Big business doesn't permit info contrary to their interests. Even the med journal editors say they can't stay in business without their advertisers, and they complain about improper influence. Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: Katanne1890 Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 9:59 PM Subject: Re: Re: Obese Man Sues Fast Food Chains Hi Ed, That's true, but have you EVER met anyone who really believed that fast food was actually nutritious? " The giant conglomerates that dominate the country now have an iron grip on the media " would love for us to put up a stink so they can be " humanitarian " and fix the problem with more laws. Yeah! FDA to the rescue again. If we want to make reforms, we need to begin in the schools. Have you ever noticed what they feed the kids? And they teach the kids this food is nutritious. Or, how about educating the hospitals? They are notorious for bad food. Seems they don't think nutrition is important when ill or injured. How about trying to educate the doctors? Many seem to believe that the only deficiency women have are hormones, Prozac, and valium. On the other hand, I have met people who were told that if they did not change their diet they would die, and they refused to give up their foods...and they died. Again, personal choice and responsibility. The job looks overwhelming, so what do I do. My best, and hope it is an example that others will want to follow. Kat http://www.katking.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Darmohray Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 6:44 PM Subject: Re: Re: Obese Man Sues Fast Food Chains I agree we should become educated not scream for laws, but the trouble is that the giant conglomerates that dominate the country now have an iron grip on the media. That's why Price is never mentioned in the media. His ideas will destroy the profits of huge businesses, such as the producers of junk food, the fast food restaurants, the agribusinesses that have destroyed most of our small farmers, etc. I hope some law suits will curb the junk food producers the way law suits have curbed the tobacco industry. Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: Katanne1890 Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 10:02 AM Subject: Re: Re: Obese Man Sues Fast Food Chains I agree. Let people become educated, not scream for laws. The more we cry for control, the more we scream lawsuit, the more laws are set down. This give more and more power to the FDA, who in turn will have even more control over what we can and cannot have. Is that what you want? Do you trust that the FDA will make decisions based on your health and your rights to healthy products? Do they have a past track record of doing what is in your best interest? I for one hope this is thrown out of court. Let people take responsibility for their own lives, and let us choose what we want to buy and to eat. Kat http://www.katking.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Idol Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 8:09 PM Subject: Re: Re: Obese Man Sues Fast Food Chains - >On a tangentially related note, I'd like to plug Stossel's upcoming >report on the War on Drugs, which will air this Tuesday on ABC at 10:00 PM. >This should give you a pretty good idea of what the War on Fat will look >like thirty years from now if all goes according to plan. We can hope, though, that the current nascent reversal in public opinion about fat will continue to grow and topple the low-fat doctrine. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.