Vaccines & Autism - The Wrong Argument

February 25, 2011

I have also pasted in from the word doc (better formatting if you can

open either document attached, or it should be on the webpage by the

weekend

to be found in the " Documents " section of the CoMeD web

site:

http://www.Mercury-freeDrugs.org

Attached " doc " and " pdf " files of an editorial

" Vaccines and Autism -- The Wrong Argument " .

Please share this message with others who seek

to understand the reality about the links between

the increase in vaccines and vaccine doses and the

epidemic increase in chronic childhood diseases.

Thanking everyone in advance for all of your

efforts, no matter how small, to spread this document

and its message to the four corners of the Earth.

Respectfully,

G. King, PhD

http://www.dr-king.com

paulgkingphd@...

Founder, FAME Systems

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Vaccines and Autism – The Wrong Argument

Introduction

The keys to maintaining any unsafe commercial activity are misdirection,

disinformation, big lies, and pervasive propaganda.

To be effective, the commercial interests use persons whom the public

trusts.

These spokespersons then promote the activity.

They lie about its risks.

They portray an activity that is less than safe as not only safe but also

as a desirable activity.

In the place of proof of safety, these propagandists invariably tout the

“lack of evidence of harm”.

In addition, the promoters of an unsafe activity do all they can to bury

studies that question the activity’s safety under an avalanche of

“recognized” studies that are touted as showing “no evidence of

harm”.

Those who benefit from the commercial activity also do all they can to

discredit those persons who dare to publish studies that question the

safety of the activity.

Further, they use their wealth to buy “experts” who refute any link

between the activity and the harm that it inflicts on the “general

public”.

Tobacco Products as an Example

In the 1900s, the healthcare establishment and medicine were intimately

involved in protecting the use of tobacco products.

In the 1950s and 1960s, there were even commercials in which doctors who

smoked promoted the “benefits” of smoking.

Numerous “scientific” studies were published that “disproved” the link

between smoking and lung cancer or heart disease.

While the tobacco industry paid for much research, the only studies that

the public got to see were those that showed no evidence of harm.

Tobacco executives even testified that they were unaware of any “real”

harm from smoking tobacco.

Yet, some appeared to be harmed by smoking.

It took a whistle blowing insider to expose the widespread collusion

among the tobacco-product producers to conceal the overwhelming proof of

that

harm.

The tobacco companies, through their attorneys, had hidden these damning

studies behind the veil of lawyer-client privilege.

Moreover, the peer-reviewed, published disinformative and misdirective

“scientific” studies that they funded spawned the term “tobacco

science”.

This term was so powerful that it became an integral part of the American

idiom.

Today, the term “tobacco science” is widely used to describe the misuse

of “science” to support any activity, like “global warming” or

“healthcare”, in a manner that benefits certain business segments at the

expense of the public’s fiscal interests or health.

“Tobacco Science”

Since the early 1960s, we were increasingly exposed to the misuse of

statistical “science” and the phrase “no evidence of harm” in the tobacco

industry’s efforts to discredit the link between “smoking” and “lung

cancer”.

To draw our attention away from the broader issue, the tobacco industry

successfully narrowed our focus to the “smoking causes lung cancer”

issue.

They did this because, based on the “available” science, this was the

hardest link to prove. This is the case because the “causes” of

lung cancer are complex; and the delay between starting to smoke and

being diagnosed with lung cancer is usually decades.

They did this to draw our attention away from the broader issue.

That broader issue was the link between “the use of tobacco products” and

“adverse health outcomes”. These tobacco-product-related adverse

health outcomes included cancer, heart disease, premature death and other

chronic diseases.

Unfortunately, it took until 4 February 1996, when the TV-program

Sixty Minutes finally aired the revelations of Dr. Jeffery Wigand,

an executive-level PhD Biochemist working inside the tobacco

industry.

In that Sixty Minutes program, Dr. Wigand came forward and

provided the American public his knowledge, well known among the tobacco

industry insiders, that using addictive tobacco products was

unsafe. He also calmly told the American people that smoking

tobacco products was causal for, or contributory to, lung cancer, heart

attack, and stroke as well as a number of chronic illnesses (e.g.,

emphysema and “hardening of the arteries”).

Since then, the American public has come to “recognize” that “big

tobacco” had intentionally lied to the people for decades about the

“safety” of using its tobacco products. Moreover, today that

industry continues to mislead the people concerning the safety of its

products.

The “Vaccine-Autism Link”

Currently, Americans are watching a similar Kabuki dance.

Today, the pharmaceutical, academic, and healthcare oligarchies and

apparently, to varying degrees, various agencies of the federal

government are engaged in an intensive misdirective propaganda

campaign.

That campaign’s apparent goal is to conceal the linkages between our

current vaccination programs and the acute harm and chronic disease that

the current vaccination programs cause.

These groups are seeking to hide these adverse outcomes behind a false

“Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” façade.

Further, without any real proof of safety, they continue to claim that

vaccines are “the safest of medicines”.

Unfortunately, the evidence provided by the independent toxicological,

animal model, patient case, and epidemiological studies overwhelmingly

points to a causal linkage between:

¨

Vaccines and/or some vaccine components and

¨

A growing number of now epidemic, chronic, childhood, medical

conditions.

In addition, though touted as “the safest of medicines”, evidence of the

real harm that vaccines can cause continues to accumulate in the

government’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)

database. Unfortunately, as our government admits, generally “no

more than 10%” of the actual adverse events associated with a given

vaccination are reported.

The vaccine propagandists, who now virtually control key aspects of the

governmental apparatus, the mainstream media and, increasingly, even the

courts, are continuing to successfully misdirect the majority of the

American public.

Currently, the American public is being incessantly brainwashed to:

a.

Focus on the “MMR-Autism” and, currently to a lesser extent, the

“Thimerosal-Autism” linkages, but

b.

Ignore the epidemic vaccination-related increases in childhood

diseases[1] that, as of 2006, now affect

more than 1 in 4 of our children.

c.

Consider the Establishment-sponsored epidemiological studies and

other biased population studies as if they were valid, but

d.

Ignore the valid independent studies that indicate causal links

between the harm observed and the vaccinations received.

In addition, to discourage independent research, the Establishment

has increasingly engaged in attacks on the integrity, motives and

expertise of the independent researchers who have dared to question the

Establishment’s fabricated realities.

Further, the Establishment has recently increased the volume and

intensity of its pro-vaccine propaganda. It has done this in an

attempt to drown out the ever-increasing volume of reports of lifelong

disability and death caused by an ever-growing number of vaccines and

vaccination program doses to an increasing percentage of our developing

children and ourselves.

Unfortunately, no recognized high-level Establishment insider has

come forward and been allowed to speak the truth to all Americans on

national television about the injury, disability and death caused by our

current vaccines and vaccination programs.

The “Vaccination ProgramChronic Disease”

Reality

The pharmaceutical industry has been able, through its advertising

dollars, to define and control most of the “vaccine safety” information

that the American public can see, hear or read. The pharmaceutical

industry has been able to do this because, unlike most countries, the

federal government has allowed drug companies to advertise its products

directly to the American consumer.

The industry has effectively used its money and the influence its

advertising money buys to “control” the mainstream media. It has

used this clout to bury the “safety” and “chronic disease” issues

surrounding our current vaccination programs beneath a tidal wave of

industry-favorable vaccine/vaccination propaganda.

Today, if a high-level vaccine-industry insider were to try to expose the

links between our current and impending national vaccination programs and

the chronic diseases in our children, there probably is no mainstream

news media outlet in the USA that would let that person speak to the

nation as Sixty Minutes did in 1996.

Today, the American mainstream media focuses on the entertainment,

advertising and propaganda businesses – it is certainly no longer in the

business of investigating its advertisers.

Yet the chronic disease and vaccination program realities remain:

¨

From unrecognized in the 1950s[2], today

several chronic childhood diseases and

disorders[3] are occurring at well above

epidemic levels[4].

¨

By 2006, at least one chronic disease afflicted more than 1 in 2 of our

children during their childhood and condemned more than 1 child in 4 to

at least one lifelong chronic

disease.[5]

¨

Vaccination programs have been shown to be a major causal factor in the

growth of chronic disease rates in the developed countries.

Instead of addressing the preceding realities, today’s mainstream media

and governmental officials:

¨

Openly attack those who are demanding reasonably safe vaccines “in-use

effective”[6] vaccines,

¨

Ignore those researchers who are demanding that any recommended

preventive mass vaccination program must be independently proven to be

“medically

cost-effective”[7],

[8],

¨

Label those seeking safer, and in-use- and cost- effective vaccines as

anti-vaccine,

¨

Label those seeking cost-effective vaccination programs as

anti-vaccination,

¨

Attempt to blame these vaccine-safety advocates and any unvaccinated

child for all of the cases of “vaccine preventable” disease in the USA,

¨

Seek to paint these advocates for vaccine safety and cost-effective

vaccination programs as disease spreaders and/or evil doers,

¨

Ignore and/or dismiss the obvious link between one or more vaccination

programs and one or more chronic diseases,

¨

Hide the reality that all live-virus vaccines infect all who are

inoculated with them with the live viruses they contain behind unproven

claims that the vaccine’s claimed benefits outweigh the vaccine’s risks,

and

¨

Disregard the reality that live-virus

vaccines[9] infect some who have contact

with the inoculees or the inoculees’ bodily emissions for weeks after the

inoculation date.

Yet, the reality remains that the real issue is the obvious connection

between the increases in the US recommended vaccination programs and the

near-parallel increases in the epidemics of chronic diseases that now

affect more than 1 in 4[10] of our

children for a lifetime.

In the 1950s, the level of chronic childhood disease in America was so

low that the low levels of acute disease (e.g., paralytic polio at

< 1 child in 3,000) grabbed the headlines.

Childhood asthma was virtually unknown; and childhood type 2 diabetes had

not even been identified[11].

Today, the level of asthma, a chronic disease, in our vaccinated children

is greater than 1 child in 9 (> 11 %); and, though our government

keeps no exact statistics, childhood type 2 diabetes has increased from

< 1 child in 100,000 to more than 1 child in 10,000.

Yet, this news is not covered.

There is no media outcry as more and more of our children become less and

less healthy.

The overall health of all Americans continues to decline as chronic

disease levels and our recommended vaccination programs show parallel

increases.

Instead of the truth, we are simply told that we must accept our

children’s and our ever-increasing levels of an ever-increasing number of

chronic diseases.

We are told we must do this because these growing levels of chronic

diseases are “genetic” or “caused by our lifestyle” or “caused by

anything other than ‘vaccines’,

‘mercury’[12],

‘adjuvants’[13], and ‘other vaccine

ingredients’”.– none of whose “safety” has ever been independently

established to the standard ‘nontoxic’, much less the higher standard of

‘sufficiently nontoxic …’ to the children and adults given vaccines

starting, in many instances, from before their birth and, with increasing

frequency, continuing periodically until death.

We are told we must accept that our vaccination programs are “safe” even

though:

¨

The lifetime safety level has not been established for any one

vaccine[14] and

¨

The short-term safety of each of our current vaccination programs has not

been properly evaluated[15].

We are told we must accept that our government-approved vaccines are safe

even though, in some instances, they are knowingly adulterated

drugs[16] and, in other instances,

government-approved vaccines seem to be knowingly mislabeled

drugs[17].

In spite of the Establishment’s advertising, propaganda, and twisted

studies, the American public is increasingly concerned about the “safety”

of vaccines and our current Establishment-profit-driven vaccination

programs.

Increasingly, the public is beginning to see that our current vaccines

and vaccination programs are, if not the cause, a major cause of

the increasing levels of chronic disease in our children and in

ourselves.

Today, many Americans understand that there is an ever-growing linkage

between “increasing doses of more vaccines and vaccine formulations” and

“increasing levels of chronic disease”.

Yet, the Establishment pro-vaccination propaganda, misrepresentations,

and personal attacks continue along with the increasing number of

vaccinations and growing levels of chronic disease in our highly

vaccinated population.

In contrast, though the Establishment refuses to study them, there

appears to be a much, much lower level of chronic disease in our

initially healthy, never-vaccinated children.

Hopefully, the American public will soon wake up and demand that we stop

all changes to our current vaccination programs until each current

vaccine is independently proven to be “reasonably safe” and in-use

effective, and all of the current preventive mass vaccinations programs

are proven to be medically cost-effective.

Then, let all vaccines that are not reasonably safe or are “deemed to be

adulterated drugs” be withdrawn from the market. For those that are

reasonably safe but are currently improperly labeled (misbranded), let

the manufacturer correct the label to fully comply with all applicable

laws without any government-granted exception or withdraw the vaccine

from the market.

In addition, we should demand that all vaccines that are not in-use

effective in preventing at least 90% of those who vaccinated with them

from contracting the disease they are intended to prevent should have

their licenses revoked.

Further, for vaccines that are reasonably safe and in-use effective, we

should demand that any mass vaccination program using them be reduced to

a program that is medically cost-effective.

For those programs that cannot be made both in-use effective and

medically cost-effective, we should demand that the federal government

immediately revoke any recommendation for all such programs.

Then, the states should revoke any vaccination mandates for any vaccine

that is “not reasonably safe”; “not in-use effective”; or “not medically

cost-effective”.

Additionally, the public should demand that all those involved in the

manufacture, licensing or approval of any vaccine that is not reasonably

safe and in-use effective be prosecuted under the

RICO[18] statutes for colluding to damage

the financial and physical health of the American people.

The public should also demand that all who colluded with the industry to

recommend any mass vaccination program that is not medically

cost-effective should be similarly prosecuted.

Finally, to ensure that only reasonably safe vaccines are developed,

licensed and approved for any use, the protections afforded to the

vaccine manufacturers by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program

(NVICP) be stripped from the law and all federal governmental agencies be

banned from indemnifying the manufacturer of preventive vaccine for the

harm its preventive vaccines can cause.

Then and only then, will the American public be able to begin trusting

that the remaining vaccines are:

¨

Reasonably safe,

¨

In-use effective, and

¨

If recommended for mass use, cost-effective.

Then, the reality that “vaccination programs” and/or the “components”

that one or more vaccines contain do cause chronic disease will slowly

fade into our past.

All that will remain is the sad historical reality that there was a time

in American history when our vaccination programs and/or the components

that one or more vaccines contained caused epidemic levels of chronic

disease.

Until then, let us engage in the correct argument: increases in

vaccination and/or vaccine doses have caused and are causing increases in

chronic diseases.

Let us begin this argument by demanding an industry-independent national

study that, by birth date, compares the health of all those children 6 to

18 years of age in the USA who were born here, have exclusively lived

here, were initially healthy at birth, and have never been vaccinated to

the health of a fully matched cohort of initially healthy children who

have been fully vaccinated.

Until:

¨

The safety and in-use effectiveness of all FDA-licensed vaccines can be

proven against a true placebo for all safety assessments and against a

disease-challenge using healthy volunteers for in-use effectiveness,

¨

The cost-effectiveness of all the currently recommended vaccination

programs can be established when all costs, including 10 times those for

all reported adverse events in VAERS, are considered, and

¨

The proposed “never vaccinated”“fully vaccinated” study can be

completed, published and its findings confirmed by independent outside

reviewers,

let us demand that, at a minimum, using today’s no-Thimerosal

vaccines, the US national childhood vaccination recommendations and state

mandates be rolled back to those recommendations and mandates that were

in effect in 1980.

About the writer, G. King, PhD

G. King, PhD Analytical Chemist, is a scientist who has:

Intensively studied:

• the use of

mercury compounds in medicine,

• vaccines

and

• vaccination programs

for more than a decade,

Expressed his concerns about various vaccines

and vaccination programs in articles that are referenced on his Internet

web site, http://www.dr-king.com in

the “Documents” section starting in 2004 – with most of these being

available for download,

Established that he supports mass vaccination

programs only when the vaccine has been proven to be reasonably

safe, in-use effective, and clearly medically cost effective in the USA

or other nation where medical cost-effectiveness A has

been clearly established when all of the costs, including the costs of

all of the vaccination-associated adverse events, have been properly

considered.

Sorted out the underlying science to the extent

that he could find such from all of the published information available

from those with differing views about the vaccines currently recommended

by the CDC as a prophylactic health measure for most of the current

vaccines in the current US-government-recommended vaccination programs

for children from before birth to 18 years of age and adults from 18

years of age and up B.

If any, after reading this article, the cited documents, or any other

article published by this reviewer, you find any significant error for

which there is unbiased science that clearly supports your alternative

view, then, by all means, send your alternative view and the supporting t

documentation to me through

dr-king@... and, if your studies

are truly unbiased, this author will be glad to: a) modify his

views accordingly and publish an updated article reflecting his

modified views and crediting you and the unbiased supporting documents

you submit.

If you find areas where the text in this review has grammatical, spelling

or word-usage errors, please let the author know so that he may

appropriately correct them and publish an appropriately revised version

of this article.

For additional information about Dr. King, his interests and his other

scientific writings, the reader can also visit the Internet web site,

http://www.dr-king.com/.

A. In general, Dr.

King has come to oppose approval of any mass vaccination program on a

“societal cost” basis because such predeterminations have been repeatedly

shown to overestimate the cost savings from the vaccination program.

B. Though slightly dated,

for a general comprehensive overview of Dr. King’s science-supported

general views about various aspects of most of the US-government approved

vaccines and recommended vaccination programs in 2008, the reader should

download the September 2008 report by the Florida Department of Health

(

http://mercury-freedrugs.org/docs/autism_rept_9-16-08.pdf) from the

CoMeD Internet web site and Dr. King’s 2-part October 2008 review of that

program

(

http://dr-king.com/docs/081017_DrftRevuPrt1ofSept2008FLDoHReprt-b.pdf

and

http://dr-king.com/docs/081017_DrftRevuPrt2ofSept2008FLDoHReprt-b.pdf

) along with his November 2008 response to the New Jersey Department of

Health and Senior Services

(

http://dr-king.com/docs/081105_PGKdrftRespnsToNJDHSSPostnOnS1071_ConscintsExmptn_f.pdf

), which updates one of the tables in the Florida review and addresses

the issues and misrepresentations about the “conscientious exemption”,

and carefully read these documents.

[1] These chronic childhood

diseases include, but are not limited to, severe food allergies and

intolerances, asthma, COPD, diabetes, gastrointestinal disease, IDCM,

certain leukemias, MS, neurodevelopmental disorders and behavioral

problems, obesity, and SIDS.

[2] For this

discussion, a disease is considered to be unrecognized if it was either

unidentified in the medical literature (e.g., childhood type 2 diabetes)

or was reported to occur at a level that was less than 1 child in 10,000

(e.g., autism) in the 1950s.

[3] Example chronic

diseases and disorders that are currently at or above epidemic levels

include, but are not limited to, childhood asthma [at greater than 1

child in 9 { > 11 %}], childhood gastrointestinal disorders [at > 1

in 100 {> 1 %}], and childhood autism spectrum disorders [at > 1

%]).

[4] Accepting that

paralytic polio occurred at epidemic levels in the late 1940s and 1950s

in the USA and that its maximum incidence rate in children was no more

than 1 child in 3,000 (< 0.033%), any childhood disease or

disorder that occurs at a frequency that is greater than 1 child in 2,000

(> 0.05 %) is a medical condition occurring at epidemic levels.

[5] This statement is

based on the results reported for the 2006 NHANES cohort of

children.

[6] The phrase

“in-use effective” means that, after vaccination with the initial

series of doses claimed to provide protection and exposure of healthy

volunteers to the disease or diseases for which the vaccine is claimed to

be protective, those who are fully vaccinated do not contract the

disease. Moreover, in general, this disease protection should last

for not less than 10 to 50 years and should match the protection level

provided by having the disease or diseases in question and recovering

from them.

[7] The phrase

“medically cost-effective” means that all of the medical costs associated

with any vaccination program must be less than all of the medical costs

that were associated with the level of disease occurring in the nation

before the vaccination program was introduced.

[8] In computing the

costs, all costs including the worst-case costs associated with the

maximum number of vaccinees who will be permanently disabled or die must

be properly considered. In addition, beyond the cost of the vaccine

dose itself, the vaccine program’s costing must also consider all

distribution, administration, tracking and recordkeeping costs.

[9] At present, the live

virus vaccines routinely recommended by the US CDC for administration to

children include attenuated vaccines for measles, mumps, and rubella; an

attenuated herpes varicella zoster vaccine (for “chickenpox” and

“shingles”); genetically engineered type A and type B influenza viruses

(for “flu”); genetically engineered human-bovine hybrid rotaviruses; and

a human-attenuated rotavirus. In addition, there are FDA-licensed

live-virus vaccines: vaccinia (for “smallpox”), yellow fever, the

Bacillus of Calmette and Guerin (BCG) strain of Mycobacterium bovis, and

Salmonella typhi Ty21a (for “typhoid fever”).

[10] The reported values is 26.6

% in the 2006 NHANES cohort of children followed from 2000 through

2006.

[11] This chronic childhood

disease was not even recognized in America until the 1980s.

[12] In today’s America, the

“mercury” in vaccines is principally the Thimerosal in most doses of

influenza vaccine as well as in several other vaccines that are less

commonly administered to children and adults. In developing countries,

Thimerosal, at preservative levels, is still used in most, if not all, of

their DTP, haemophylis influenzae, and hepatitis B vaccine doses.

[13] Adjuvants are mostly

insoluble polymeric aluminum compounds but also, with GlaxoKline’s

HPV vaccine Ceravix®, “organic oil-in-water” compounds, which

are known human immune system disruptors that are used to increase the

levels of antibodies formed when vaccine antigens are co-injected with

them.

[14] To do this, a study would

have to be conducted comparing a cohort of not less than 10,000 initially

healthy subjects who have been vaccinated to a matched cohort of 10,000

initially healthy never-vaccinated subjects given a “true placebo” (i.e.,

sterile isotonic saline) for a period of not less than 4.5 years.

[15] To do this, a study would

have to be conducted comparing a cohort of not less than 1,500 initially

healthy subjects who have been vaccinated to a matched cohort of 1,500

initially healthy never-vaccinated subjects given a “true placebo” (i.e.,

sterile isotonic saline) for a period of not less than 50 years.

[16] Preserved vaccine

formulations for which the manufacturer failed to prove the preservative

was “sufficiently nontoxic … as required by 21 CFR § 610.15(a), where 21

CFR § 610.15(a) is a CGMP regulation and under 21 USC § 351(a)(2)(, a

drug that fails to comply with all aspects of current good manufacturing

practice (CGMP) is “deemed to be adulterated”. In general, this

knowing failure has been admitted by the vaccine makers and officials of

the US Food and Drug Administration.

[17] Vaccines in which the

manufacturer knowingly failed to fully disclose the names and amounts of

all of the components in a vaccine dose in a manner that, at a minimum,

fully complies with all the strictures of 21 CFR § 210.100 for parenteral

drugs (drugs that are injected or infused).

[18] RICO is the acronym for the

“Racketeering, Influencing, and Corrupt Organizations” statutes as set

forth in 18 USC Sec 1961 et seq.

Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian

Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA

Vaccines -

http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy

http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com

Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy

Online/email courses - next classes start February 4

2 of 2 File(s)

20110224_Vaccines&Autism__TheWrongArgument_fnldrftb.pdf

20110224_Vaccines&Autism__TheWrongArgument_fnldrfta.doc

February 25, 2011