Guest guest Posted August 3, 2002 Report Share Posted August 3, 2002 Your welcome! Robin <<Great reading, thanks for posting Mike>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2002 Report Share Posted August 3, 2002 Ok I understand carbs being a compromise food. However, the trouble I have, for example is fats fats? We all know the answer is 'No' to that. There is a difference between fats that are good for you and the ones that are bad for you. Therefore, how can there NOT be a difference between refined and complex carbs? Perhaps, carbs have the same reaction in the body, but I personally would rather see someone eat a complex carb over a refined carb any day. Those refined carbs have to be more damaging than the complex IMHO. Can one take the rise in insulin from carbs to the extreme that others have taken to cholesterol in avoiding certain foods that are actually good for you? I can certainly understand limiting carbs in comparison to the amount of carbs recommended by the food pyramid in the SAD. However, if I do eat some carbs I'd rather they be the complex carbs (prepared properly) and not the refined ones. Perhaps I'm missing something here? Robin <<I think he (and Taubes and other low-carb advocates) are absolutely right. People do differ in their ability to handle carbs, including complex carbs, but I think even complex ones are basically a compromise food. Per NAPD, people who've eaten healthily all their lives (i.e. plenty of animal fat and animal proteins) and who come from healthy stock apparently do OK when some grains are incorporated into their diet (as long as they're prepared properly and accompanied by loads of fatty animal foods) but I doubt there are many modern people who could do as well on such a diet. Perhaps if we all eat well, our great grandchildren could. Though again, mileage will vary. - >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 4, 2002 Report Share Posted August 4, 2002 > Can one take the rise in insulin from carbs to the extreme that > others have taken to cholesterol > in avoiding certain foods that are actually good for you? I can > certainly understand limiting carbs in comparison to the amount of > carbs recommended by the food pyramid in the SAD. However, if I > do eat some carbs I'd rather they be the complex carbs (prepared > properly) and not the refined ones. > Perhaps I'm missing something here? > Robin I don't think you're missing a thing, Robin. Weston Price found healthy primitives that had *very* high carb intakes. His swiss villagers ate mostly fresh milk (high carb) and rye bread (very high carb *and* fairly high glycemic index). Several of the healthy primitive groups had quite high carb intakes. Demonizing carbs is as dangerous a game as demonizing fats. Even if there weren't a number of deficiencies that avoiding carbs completely is likely to create (and there definitely are such deficiencies), it would still be dangerous to the extent that it takes the emphasis off of what's *missing* from the diet and puts it on what *is* in the diet. The problem of what *is* in our foods isn't nearly as important as the problem of what's *not* in our foods. Inventing carbs and their consequent insulin production as the next " poison " in our food supply just sets us up for a new crop of chronic diseases and a new market for food processors to exploit. I'm not much of a fan of grains from a nutritional standpoint but not because of the carb content. It's the unbalanced mineral profile and the unbalanced EFA composition that concerns me...and both of those problems disappear for cultures with certain dietary patterns. A diet high in dairy or high in fish and vegetables can easily balance the deficient characteristics of grains...at which point, there's no problem with properly prepared whole grains. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 4, 2002 Report Share Posted August 4, 2002 > - > Yes, many of those cultures ate a fair amount of carbs, though to call > their diet high-carb simply doesn't hold water in comparison to true modern > high-carb diets, but consider: fresh milk may be fairly carby, but it also > has plenty of fat and protein, and when they ate rye bread, they didn't eat > a low-fat or non-fat sandwich, they slathered it with tons of butter or > other sources of fat and protein. There is a big difference in the rye bread consumed by the Swiss villagers and the grocery store variety " rye " bread. I have seen " rye " bread that contains rye and wheat flour, corn syrup and sugar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.