Guest guest Posted January 28, 2011 Report Share Posted January 28, 2011 When this first came up I knew it was BS. 3/4 of a million as opposed to how may BILLION? That's just the way the drug companies work. If people see it on the news, they take it hook, line, and sinker with little or any thought behind it at all. From: Sheri Nakken <vaccinedangers@...>Subject: British Medical Journal caught printing false accusations against Dr Wakefield - retraction?Date: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 10:51 PM From: NaturalNews [ mailto:insider@...] NaturalNews Insider Alert ( www.NaturalNews.com ) email newsletter (Unsubscribe instructions at bottom) Dear NaturalNews readers,Documents have emerged today proving the innocence of Dr Wakefield, the vaccine / autism researcher who has been falsely accused by the British Medical Journal of "fabricating" the study data he published in 1998.The documents, just made public yesterday, reveal that other researchers replicated his results independently and with documentation, 14 months before Dr Wakefield published his own work.We have the full story and the links to these documents that now shatter the BMJ's false reporting and blatantly dishonest misrepresentation of the facts:http://www.naturalnews.com/031116_Dr__Wakefield_British_Medical_Journal.html Dr Wakefield is now demanding a retraction from the British Medical Journal. Will the BMJ issue one? Unlikely, given that this whole thing has been a political witch hunt to begin with and never had anything to do with scientific truth from the very beginning!Here is Dr Wakefield's retraction demand:http://www.naturalnews.com/031117_BMJ_Dr__Wakefield.htmlIt's not just the BMJ that's spouting lies, by the way. It turns out that much of modern medical "science" is technically and scientifically speaking just pure hokum and quackery. Get the facts on the fraud of modern medicine:http://www.naturalnews.com/031121_medical_research_fraud.html Dr Wakefield demands retraction from BMJ after documents prove innocence from allegations of vaccine autism data fraud(NaturalNews) In light of new evidence that has emerged clearing Dr Wakefield of the allegations that he fabricated study data involving MMR vaccines and symptoms of autism, Dr Wakefield is now publicly demanding a retraction from the British Medical... Documents emerge proving Dr Wakefield innocent; BMJ and Deer caught misrepresenting the facts(NaturalNews) New documents have emerged that clear Dr Wakefield of the allegations of fraud recently made by the British Medical Journal and its reporter Deer. This new evidence "completely negates the allegations that I committed scientific fraud... Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopathhttp://homeopathycures.wordpress.com/ & http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ONLINE/Email classes in Homeopathy; Vaccine Dangers; Childhood Diseases Next classes start Friday February 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 28, 2011 Report Share Posted January 28, 2011 When this first came up I knew it was BS. 3/4 of a million as opposed to how may BILLION? That's just the way the drug companies work. If people see it on the news, they take it hook, line, and sinker with little or any thought behind it at all. From: Sheri Nakken <vaccinedangers@...>Subject: British Medical Journal caught printing false accusations against Dr Wakefield - retraction?Date: Thursday, January 27, 2011, 10:51 PM From: NaturalNews [ mailto:insider@...] NaturalNews Insider Alert ( www.NaturalNews.com ) email newsletter (Unsubscribe instructions at bottom) Dear NaturalNews readers,Documents have emerged today proving the innocence of Dr Wakefield, the vaccine / autism researcher who has been falsely accused by the British Medical Journal of "fabricating" the study data he published in 1998.The documents, just made public yesterday, reveal that other researchers replicated his results independently and with documentation, 14 months before Dr Wakefield published his own work.We have the full story and the links to these documents that now shatter the BMJ's false reporting and blatantly dishonest misrepresentation of the facts:http://www.naturalnews.com/031116_Dr__Wakefield_British_Medical_Journal.html Dr Wakefield is now demanding a retraction from the British Medical Journal. Will the BMJ issue one? Unlikely, given that this whole thing has been a political witch hunt to begin with and never had anything to do with scientific truth from the very beginning!Here is Dr Wakefield's retraction demand:http://www.naturalnews.com/031117_BMJ_Dr__Wakefield.htmlIt's not just the BMJ that's spouting lies, by the way. It turns out that much of modern medical "science" is technically and scientifically speaking just pure hokum and quackery. Get the facts on the fraud of modern medicine:http://www.naturalnews.com/031121_medical_research_fraud.html Dr Wakefield demands retraction from BMJ after documents prove innocence from allegations of vaccine autism data fraud(NaturalNews) In light of new evidence that has emerged clearing Dr Wakefield of the allegations that he fabricated study data involving MMR vaccines and symptoms of autism, Dr Wakefield is now publicly demanding a retraction from the British Medical... Documents emerge proving Dr Wakefield innocent; BMJ and Deer caught misrepresenting the facts(NaturalNews) New documents have emerged that clear Dr Wakefield of the allegations of fraud recently made by the British Medical Journal and its reporter Deer. This new evidence "completely negates the allegations that I committed scientific fraud... Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopathhttp://homeopathycures.wordpress.com/ & http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ONLINE/Email classes in Homeopathy; Vaccine Dangers; Childhood Diseases Next classes start Friday February 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.