Guest guest Posted August 16, 2002 Report Share Posted August 16, 2002 oops! just noticed an error from a post i wrote yesterday. wrote: >>>>Understood, but even with that restriction, are all " traditional " foods good? my response was: ---->maybe there are, but I can't think of any - at least not 'first choice foods' which are the foods we talk about all day long, and that most or all of us can afford to eat. well duh! that's the opposite of what i was trying to say i think i deleted a sentence preceding this one that totally changes the meaning of this. it was something like " Are there traditional foods that are NOT healthy? " or something to that effect. In that context, the rest of my post should make sense! without this sentence, the whole thing is confusing so it should read: Are there traditional foods that are not healthy? maybe there are, but I can't think of any - at least not 'first choice foods' which are the foods we talk about all day long, and that most or all of us can afford to eat. when you get into the period of the broad spectrum revolution and the fact that people had to resort to second and third choice foods due to over hunting or the ice age die off of lots of prey species, then no, i don't think those second/third choice foods are that 'good.' etc, etc... Suze Fisher Web Design & Development http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze3shjg/ mailto:s.fisher22@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.