“PANDEMRIX H1N1 VACCINE – AN UNWISE CHOICE ?”

[Guest guest]

http://sanevax.org/blog/?p=1952

“PANDEMRIX H1N1 VACCINE – AN UNWISE CHOICE?”“PANDEMRIX

H1N1 VACCINE – AN UNWISE CHOICE?”

February 2011

SL

Norway

NARCOLEPSY:

Pandemrix has recently been suspected of increasing the risk of the

auto-immune disorder narcolepsy (1)

SQUALENE:

Pandemrix has the lowest concentration of virus antigen of all the H1N1

vaccines which are available on the market (2). Because of this the

adjuvant squalene (AS03) has been included in order to boost the immune

response.

(NB – immune response is not the same as immunity!) Virus antigen is

considerably more expensive than squalene.

Squalene is highly controversial and has been suspected of increasing the

risk of auto-immune disorders, including the Gulf War Syndrome, multiple

sclerosis and several others (3,10). Squalene adjuvants are routinely

used to induce arthritis in rats in a laboratory setting (4).

It is known to cause more pain and inflammation at the injection site

than squalene-free injections (2).

Because squalene is an oily substance the emulsifying agent polysorbate

80 (Tween 80) is included in order to blend it with the aqueous phase

containing the virus antigen.

POLYSORBATE 80:

Polysorbate 80 has been suspected of increasing the risk of anaphylactic

shock. Research shows that it causes reproductive disturbances in rats

and infertility in mice (5)

It is suspected of having carcinogenic and mutagenic properties

(6)

Because it makes the blood-brain barrier more porous (“opens it up”), it

is used in special injections to facilitate the passage of certain

substances through the barrier into the brain tissue (7,10)

This property is obviously undesirable in vaccines. Polysorbate 80 in

Pandemrix may facilitate the passage of mercury in thimerosal and other

substances through the barrier into the brain. Small children are

especially vulnerable as they have underdeveloped blood-brain barriers.

It is therefore no doubt unwise to include polysorbate 80 in injections

for children and pregnant women.

Because of polysorbate 80’s effect on the fate of mercury and other

substances, the actual composition of vaccines should be considered in

addition to the amount of mercury and other ingredients.

The vaccine may not be given to people who are strongly allergic to eggs.

This does not appear to have been considered when Pandemrix was chosen

for mass vaccination. (2)

MULTIDOSE VIALS:

All injections may normally be manufactured in the form of single

dose prefilled syringes or as multidose vials. Single dose products are

more expensive to manufacture.

Single dose injections do not require preservatives, but these are

necessary in multidose products in order to reduce microbial

contamination when several doses are withdrawn (8)

MERCURY:

The preservative in Pandemrix is thimerosal which contains almost 50%

mercury. The presence of mercury is extremely controversial. It is a

known neurotoxic that can weaken the immune system and cause neurological

damage (10). Thimerosal has been shown to cause autism-like symptoms in

laboratory animals. There are strong indications that mercury is the

cause of autism in human beings (9,10)

CONTAMINATION:

The vials of Pandemrix contain ten doses each of 0.5ml. Before

withdrawal of each dose the vial should be thoroughly shaken (11).

Microbial contamination may occur in connection with the administrator’s

technique and from the surroundings, especially when there are many

people present. This risk is less in the case of single dose injections.

A higher degree of competence may therefore be required for

administrating multidose injections.

EVEN DOSES OF VIRUS ANTIGEN

The virus antigen is in the form of tiny, invisible particles

dispersed in the vaccine. Irrespective of the administrator’s technique

regarding shaking, the correct amount of virus antigen in each 0.5ml dose

cannot be guaranteed (11). (In the case of prefilled injections it is

possible to regularly analyse and control the amount during online

processes).

In the case of the multidose vials of Pandemrix, even if the doses of

0.5ml are accurately measured, one cannot possibly know if one receives

the correct amount or strength of virus antigen – or if it is the same as

that which the next person in the vaccine queue receives!

TO SUMMARISE:

If the authorities had chosen a more expensive single dose product it

would not have been necessary to include mercury, there would be less

risk of microbial contamination and a greater possibility that each dose

has the correct strength of the virus antigen and other

ingredients.

If the authorities had chosen a vaccine which had sufficient strength

with respect to virus antigen, the inclusion of squalene and polysorbate

80 would have been unnecessary.

(1)

http://www.infowars.com/finland-suspends-swine-flu-shots-after-vaccine-linked-with-neurological-disorder/

(2)

http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000832/WC500038121.pdf

(3)

http://www.autoimmune.com/GWSGen.html

(4)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12086312?dopt=Abstract

(5)

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/polysorbate.html

(6)

http://www.infonews.co.nz/news.cfm?id=28314

(7)

http://www.whale.to/v/tween_80.html

(8)

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/11801.php

(9)

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/130605

(10)

http://thetruthergirls.com/Toxic_Ingredients.html

(11)

http://www.fhi.no/dokumenter/37a58a36b6.pdf

This entry was written by

Carol, posted on

February 3, 2011 at 9:48 pm, filed under

Flu Vaccines,

Narcolepsy,

OTHER VACCINATIONS,

Other Vaccine Reactions,

Pharmaceuticals and tagged

H1N1,

H1N1 Vaccine,

Vaccinations,

Vaccine

Adverse Reactions. Bookmark the

permalink. Follow any

comments here with the

RSS feed for this

post. Post a

comment or leave a trackback:

Trackback

URL.

One Trackback

By

healthandknowledge.com » Blog Archive » “PANDEMRIX H1N1 VACCINE – AN

UNWISE CHOICE?” | SaneVax General Blog on February 7, 2011 at 11:10

am

[...] See more here: “PANDEMRIX H1N1 VACCINE – AN UNWISE CHOICE?” |

SaneVax General Blog [...]

[Guest guest]

http://sanevax.org/blog/?p=1952

“PANDEMRIX H1N1 VACCINE – AN UNWISE CHOICE?”“PANDEMRIX

H1N1 VACCINE – AN UNWISE CHOICE?”

February 2011

SL

Norway

NARCOLEPSY:

Pandemrix has recently been suspected of increasing the risk of the

auto-immune disorder narcolepsy (1)

SQUALENE:

Pandemrix has the lowest concentration of virus antigen of all the H1N1

vaccines which are available on the market (2). Because of this the

adjuvant squalene (AS03) has been included in order to boost the immune

response.

(NB – immune response is not the same as immunity!) Virus antigen is

considerably more expensive than squalene.

Squalene is highly controversial and has been suspected of increasing the

risk of auto-immune disorders, including the Gulf War Syndrome, multiple

sclerosis and several others (3,10). Squalene adjuvants are routinely

used to induce arthritis in rats in a laboratory setting (4).

It is known to cause more pain and inflammation at the injection site

than squalene-free injections (2).

Because squalene is an oily substance the emulsifying agent polysorbate

80 (Tween 80) is included in order to blend it with the aqueous phase

containing the virus antigen.

POLYSORBATE 80:

Polysorbate 80 has been suspected of increasing the risk of anaphylactic

shock. Research shows that it causes reproductive disturbances in rats

and infertility in mice (5)

It is suspected of having carcinogenic and mutagenic properties

(6)

Because it makes the blood-brain barrier more porous (“opens it up”), it

is used in special injections to facilitate the passage of certain

substances through the barrier into the brain tissue (7,10)

This property is obviously undesirable in vaccines. Polysorbate 80 in

Pandemrix may facilitate the passage of mercury in thimerosal and other

substances through the barrier into the brain. Small children are

especially vulnerable as they have underdeveloped blood-brain barriers.

It is therefore no doubt unwise to include polysorbate 80 in injections

for children and pregnant women.

Because of polysorbate 80’s effect on the fate of mercury and other

substances, the actual composition of vaccines should be considered in

addition to the amount of mercury and other ingredients.

The vaccine may not be given to people who are strongly allergic to eggs.

This does not appear to have been considered when Pandemrix was chosen

for mass vaccination. (2)

MULTIDOSE VIALS:

All injections may normally be manufactured in the form of single

dose prefilled syringes or as multidose vials. Single dose products are

more expensive to manufacture.

Single dose injections do not require preservatives, but these are

necessary in multidose products in order to reduce microbial

contamination when several doses are withdrawn (8)

MERCURY:

The preservative in Pandemrix is thimerosal which contains almost 50%

mercury. The presence of mercury is extremely controversial. It is a

known neurotoxic that can weaken the immune system and cause neurological

damage (10). Thimerosal has been shown to cause autism-like symptoms in

laboratory animals. There are strong indications that mercury is the

cause of autism in human beings (9,10)

CONTAMINATION:

The vials of Pandemrix contain ten doses each of 0.5ml. Before

withdrawal of each dose the vial should be thoroughly shaken (11).

Microbial contamination may occur in connection with the administrator’s

technique and from the surroundings, especially when there are many

people present. This risk is less in the case of single dose injections.

A higher degree of competence may therefore be required for

administrating multidose injections.

EVEN DOSES OF VIRUS ANTIGEN

The virus antigen is in the form of tiny, invisible particles

dispersed in the vaccine. Irrespective of the administrator’s technique

regarding shaking, the correct amount of virus antigen in each 0.5ml dose

cannot be guaranteed (11). (In the case of prefilled injections it is

possible to regularly analyse and control the amount during online

processes).

In the case of the multidose vials of Pandemrix, even if the doses of

0.5ml are accurately measured, one cannot possibly know if one receives

the correct amount or strength of virus antigen – or if it is the same as

that which the next person in the vaccine queue receives!

TO SUMMARISE:

If the authorities had chosen a more expensive single dose product it

would not have been necessary to include mercury, there would be less

risk of microbial contamination and a greater possibility that each dose

has the correct strength of the virus antigen and other

ingredients.

If the authorities had chosen a vaccine which had sufficient strength

with respect to virus antigen, the inclusion of squalene and polysorbate

80 would have been unnecessary.

(1)

http://www.infowars.com/finland-suspends-swine-flu-shots-after-vaccine-linked-with-neurological-disorder/

(2)

http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000832/WC500038121.pdf

(3)

http://www.autoimmune.com/GWSGen.html

(4)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12086312?dopt=Abstract

(5)

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/polysorbate.html

(6)

http://www.infonews.co.nz/news.cfm?id=28314

(7)

http://www.whale.to/v/tween_80.html

(8)

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/11801.php

(9)

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/130605

(10)

http://thetruthergirls.com/Toxic_Ingredients.html

(11)

http://www.fhi.no/dokumenter/37a58a36b6.pdf

This entry was written by

Carol, posted on

February 3, 2011 at 9:48 pm, filed under

Flu Vaccines,

Narcolepsy,

OTHER VACCINATIONS,

Other Vaccine Reactions,

Pharmaceuticals and tagged

H1N1,

H1N1 Vaccine,

Vaccinations,

Vaccine

Adverse Reactions. Bookmark the

permalink. Follow any

comments here with the

RSS feed for this

post. Post a

comment or leave a trackback:

Trackback

URL.

One Trackback

By

healthandknowledge.com » Blog Archive » “PANDEMRIX H1N1 VACCINE – AN

UNWISE CHOICE?” | SaneVax General Blog on February 7, 2011 at 11:10

am

[...] See more here: “PANDEMRIX H1N1 VACCINE – AN UNWISE CHOICE?” |

SaneVax General Blog [...]