Guest guest Posted September 18, 2002 Report Share Posted September 18, 2002 > Wanita- > > >Are they a commercial producer, ? > > Yup. Licensed and everything. Raw and strictly grass-fed. It's great > stuff, and they don't feed a single kernel of grain to any of their cows. > > <><><><><><><><><><><><><<<>Do they feed alfalfa and call it hay? Dairies would have to feed extra protein other than just dry hay to get any milk. Alfalfa has a lot more protein than hay (called prairie hay out here). Even range cattle out here get alfalfa and prairie hay feed in the winter.>><><><><><><<><><<>Dennis - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 19, 2002 Report Share Posted September 19, 2002 At 11:17 PM 9/16/02 -0400, you wrote: >Why do farmers bother to make silage then? > >Kris Here in New England at least I think that corn growing has become such a custom (like the Inuit comparing Steffanson's salt craving to their bringing up their children with tobacco) that its a hard one to break. It was corn that fed the Pilgrims so they made it through their first winter. 30+ canoe loads of corn from this valley kept the first settlers of Hartford CT from starving another winter later. Silage was likely a natural offshoot of excess corn production and what to do with the entire plant rather than the corn crib corn for the chickens. Its less machinery to chop corn than to bale hay too.Idon't know nutritionally how fermented silage compares to hay. I'd think the glycemic index is at the top with the combination of corn and near alcohol from fermentation. With so much farmland being lost to development in the east silage could produce more feed per acre than hay too. Wanita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.