Guest guest Posted January 5, 2011 Report Share Posted January 5, 2011 http://www.ageofautism.com/2011/01/the-offit-index-tracking-a-patent-owners-ongoing-financial-interest-in-one-vaccines-sales.html January 05, 2011 The Offit Index: Tracking a Patent Owner’s Ongoing Financial Interest in One Vaccine’s Sales By Mark Blaxill Vaccine developer Offit has just published a new book, Deadly Choices, in which he turns up the volume and the rhetoric against what he likes to call “the anti-vaccine movement.” His target, he argues, has launched a dangerous assault on the public health, and its misguided disciples are everywhere, including people like you and me. Based on the advance description, I don’t plan on boosting his sales. But my friend and colleague Dan Olmsted has read it and wrote about it HERE. Dan found the tone mean-spirited and describes Offit’s work as “a score-settling screed against anyone who's ever criticized him or vaccine safety surveillance.” Offit isn’t alone in his name calling, it seems the public relations mavens of the medical industry have been working overtime to pin the “anti-vaccine” label to anyone they can find. The reality, however, is that the movement Offit and his industry cronies criticize so ruthlessly is really a grass-roots consumer movement, concerned about the health of children, distrustful of the “public-private partnership” that has emerged with the vaccine industry and its regulators, and is speaking out with increasing force for long-overdue improvements in vaccine safety management. This movement is good for children’s health, but not for the vaccine industry’s profits, which is why the propaganda is escalating. In his new book, Offit takes the hate speech to a new level, asking all Americans to fear this diverse community of concerned consumers because, “the anti-vaccine movement threatens us all. Even for Offit, this new book is an escalation. He has written three books before this one, What Every Parent Should Know About Vaccines (a standard “vaccines are always safe” propaganda piece published in 1998), The Cutter Incident (a revisionist history of one of the great breakdowns of vaccine safety, in which he offers the bizarre complaint in 2005 that fear of litigation was driving vaccine manufacturers away from the industry, even as industry revenues and profits were exploding like never before) and Autism’s False Prophets (a 2008 attack on the autism parent community for raising concerns over vaccine safety). The thread in Offit’s writing is clear, making the world safe for vaccine manufacturers. But why would a man like Offit, so obviously concerned for his public reputation, get down and dirty on vaccine safety advocates, parents like Barbara Loe Fisher, McCarthy and our own J.B. Handley? One possible answer is the simplest one of all. They’re costing him money. By my count, close to $1.5 million dollars so far and rising. That’s the cumulative sum of royalty income due to the relatively weak performance (as compared to the industry leader, Prevnar) of his patented Rotateq vaccine. Counting Offit’s Millions. About a year ago, Dan Olmsted and I reported in considerable detail on Offit’s financial stake in Rotateq before (see HERE). We demonstrated that he has already made over $10 million and stands to gain much more if Rotateq is commercially successful. But exactly how much more? One benchmark for Offit’s Rotateq royalty earnings is Pfizer’s Prevnar vaccine, which protects against certain strains of strep bacteria. In commercial terms, Prevnar, which was introduced by Wyeth in 2000, is the most successful vaccine ever launched. In its tenth year it reached roughly $3 billion in worldwide revenues and is on a pace to exceed $3.5 billion in 2010. For any vaccine developer looking to maximize profits, Prevnar sets the standard. It was adopted rapidly, both in the United States and globally; it has no competitors in its category; with the exception of one episode of supply problems in 2003, its growth has been continuous; and its history has been remarkably free of any reputation problems due to safety concerns. Using Prevnar’s commercial history, one can measure Rotateq’s sales performance in the period since its introduction in 2006. Setting “year one” the same for both vaccines, (Prevnar was approved in February 2000, Rotateq in March 2006), the chart below compare the annual worldwide revenues, showing clearly how Rotateq has already fallen behind Prevnar in its five years on the market (I projected 2010 revenues for both products by assuming fourth quarter revenues in 2010 were unchanged from last year and added that estimate to reported revenues for the first three quarters). GO to webpage for more details and graphs Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA Vaccines - http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes start December 2 & 3, 2010 and January 6 & 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2011 Report Share Posted January 5, 2011 http://www.ageofautism.com/2011/01/the-offit-index-tracking-a-patent-owners-ongoing-financial-interest-in-one-vaccines-sales.html January 05, 2011 The Offit Index: Tracking a Patent Owner’s Ongoing Financial Interest in One Vaccine’s Sales By Mark Blaxill Vaccine developer Offit has just published a new book, Deadly Choices, in which he turns up the volume and the rhetoric against what he likes to call “the anti-vaccine movement.” His target, he argues, has launched a dangerous assault on the public health, and its misguided disciples are everywhere, including people like you and me. Based on the advance description, I don’t plan on boosting his sales. But my friend and colleague Dan Olmsted has read it and wrote about it HERE. Dan found the tone mean-spirited and describes Offit’s work as “a score-settling screed against anyone who's ever criticized him or vaccine safety surveillance.” Offit isn’t alone in his name calling, it seems the public relations mavens of the medical industry have been working overtime to pin the “anti-vaccine” label to anyone they can find. The reality, however, is that the movement Offit and his industry cronies criticize so ruthlessly is really a grass-roots consumer movement, concerned about the health of children, distrustful of the “public-private partnership” that has emerged with the vaccine industry and its regulators, and is speaking out with increasing force for long-overdue improvements in vaccine safety management. This movement is good for children’s health, but not for the vaccine industry’s profits, which is why the propaganda is escalating. In his new book, Offit takes the hate speech to a new level, asking all Americans to fear this diverse community of concerned consumers because, “the anti-vaccine movement threatens us all. Even for Offit, this new book is an escalation. He has written three books before this one, What Every Parent Should Know About Vaccines (a standard “vaccines are always safe” propaganda piece published in 1998), The Cutter Incident (a revisionist history of one of the great breakdowns of vaccine safety, in which he offers the bizarre complaint in 2005 that fear of litigation was driving vaccine manufacturers away from the industry, even as industry revenues and profits were exploding like never before) and Autism’s False Prophets (a 2008 attack on the autism parent community for raising concerns over vaccine safety). The thread in Offit’s writing is clear, making the world safe for vaccine manufacturers. But why would a man like Offit, so obviously concerned for his public reputation, get down and dirty on vaccine safety advocates, parents like Barbara Loe Fisher, McCarthy and our own J.B. Handley? One possible answer is the simplest one of all. They’re costing him money. By my count, close to $1.5 million dollars so far and rising. That’s the cumulative sum of royalty income due to the relatively weak performance (as compared to the industry leader, Prevnar) of his patented Rotateq vaccine. Counting Offit’s Millions. About a year ago, Dan Olmsted and I reported in considerable detail on Offit’s financial stake in Rotateq before (see HERE). We demonstrated that he has already made over $10 million and stands to gain much more if Rotateq is commercially successful. But exactly how much more? One benchmark for Offit’s Rotateq royalty earnings is Pfizer’s Prevnar vaccine, which protects against certain strains of strep bacteria. In commercial terms, Prevnar, which was introduced by Wyeth in 2000, is the most successful vaccine ever launched. In its tenth year it reached roughly $3 billion in worldwide revenues and is on a pace to exceed $3.5 billion in 2010. For any vaccine developer looking to maximize profits, Prevnar sets the standard. It was adopted rapidly, both in the United States and globally; it has no competitors in its category; with the exception of one episode of supply problems in 2003, its growth has been continuous; and its history has been remarkably free of any reputation problems due to safety concerns. Using Prevnar’s commercial history, one can measure Rotateq’s sales performance in the period since its introduction in 2006. Setting “year one” the same for both vaccines, (Prevnar was approved in February 2000, Rotateq in March 2006), the chart below compare the annual worldwide revenues, showing clearly how Rotateq has already fallen behind Prevnar in its five years on the market (I projected 2010 revenues for both products by assuming fourth quarter revenues in 2010 were unchanged from last year and added that estimate to reported revenues for the first three quarters). GO to webpage for more details and graphs Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA Vaccines - http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes start December 2 & 3, 2010 and January 6 & 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.