Guest guest Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 http://www.dmidjournal.com/article/PIIS0732889311001441/abstract?rss=yes JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASE Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages 479-485 (August 2011) HBsAg blood screening and diagnosis: performance evaluation of the ARCHITECT HBsAg qualitative and ARCHITECT HBsAg qualitative confirmatory assays Christian Poppa, Doris Kramsa, Christian Beckerta, Carsten Buenninga, Lucinda Queirósb, Loredana Piroc, Marina Lucianic, Markus Roebbeckea, Hans- Kapprella Received 26 January 2011; accepted 28 March 2011. published online 09 June 2011. Abstract A low initial reactive rate for screening assays is important for time- and cost-effective infectious disease testing. Therefore, the new ARCHITECT HBsAg Qualitative screening assay, in conjunction with the new ARCHITECT HBsAg Qualitative Confirmatory assay, was introduced. As the role of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) as surrogate marker for HBV resolution and the monitoring of drug effectiveness are becoming increasingly important, the established ARCHITECT HBsAg Quantitative assay remains available on the market. Precision, sensitivity, and specificity of the newly developed screening assay were in the range of established HBsAg assays. Seroconversion sensitivity was slightly superior compared to other commercially available assays. An initial reactive rate of 0.2% (without HBsAg-confirmed positive samples of 0.17%) for the ARCHITECT HBsAg Qualitative assay was observed. As the new screening assay is a 1-step assay format, the “high-dose hook effect” was investigated to assess the risk of false-negative results, but even very high positive HBsAg samples obtained signals clearly above the cutoff. a Abbott GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden-Delkenheim, Germany b Instituto Português do Sangue, Porto, Portugal c SIMT Policlinico Umberto I Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-(0)6122/58-1409; fax: +49(0)6122/58-1473. PII: S0732-8893(11)00144-1 doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.03.022 © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 http://www.dmidjournal.com/article/PIIS0732889311001441/abstract?rss=yes JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASE Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages 479-485 (August 2011) HBsAg blood screening and diagnosis: performance evaluation of the ARCHITECT HBsAg qualitative and ARCHITECT HBsAg qualitative confirmatory assays Christian Poppa, Doris Kramsa, Christian Beckerta, Carsten Buenninga, Lucinda Queirósb, Loredana Piroc, Marina Lucianic, Markus Roebbeckea, Hans- Kapprella Received 26 January 2011; accepted 28 March 2011. published online 09 June 2011. Abstract A low initial reactive rate for screening assays is important for time- and cost-effective infectious disease testing. Therefore, the new ARCHITECT HBsAg Qualitative screening assay, in conjunction with the new ARCHITECT HBsAg Qualitative Confirmatory assay, was introduced. As the role of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) as surrogate marker for HBV resolution and the monitoring of drug effectiveness are becoming increasingly important, the established ARCHITECT HBsAg Quantitative assay remains available on the market. Precision, sensitivity, and specificity of the newly developed screening assay were in the range of established HBsAg assays. Seroconversion sensitivity was slightly superior compared to other commercially available assays. An initial reactive rate of 0.2% (without HBsAg-confirmed positive samples of 0.17%) for the ARCHITECT HBsAg Qualitative assay was observed. As the new screening assay is a 1-step assay format, the “high-dose hook effect” was investigated to assess the risk of false-negative results, but even very high positive HBsAg samples obtained signals clearly above the cutoff. a Abbott GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden-Delkenheim, Germany b Instituto Português do Sangue, Porto, Portugal c SIMT Policlinico Umberto I Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-(0)6122/58-1409; fax: +49(0)6122/58-1473. PII: S0732-8893(11)00144-1 doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.03.022 © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 http://www.dmidjournal.com/article/PIIS0732889311001441/abstract?rss=yes JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASE Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages 479-485 (August 2011) HBsAg blood screening and diagnosis: performance evaluation of the ARCHITECT HBsAg qualitative and ARCHITECT HBsAg qualitative confirmatory assays Christian Poppa, Doris Kramsa, Christian Beckerta, Carsten Buenninga, Lucinda Queirósb, Loredana Piroc, Marina Lucianic, Markus Roebbeckea, Hans- Kapprella Received 26 January 2011; accepted 28 March 2011. published online 09 June 2011. Abstract A low initial reactive rate for screening assays is important for time- and cost-effective infectious disease testing. Therefore, the new ARCHITECT HBsAg Qualitative screening assay, in conjunction with the new ARCHITECT HBsAg Qualitative Confirmatory assay, was introduced. As the role of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) as surrogate marker for HBV resolution and the monitoring of drug effectiveness are becoming increasingly important, the established ARCHITECT HBsAg Quantitative assay remains available on the market. Precision, sensitivity, and specificity of the newly developed screening assay were in the range of established HBsAg assays. Seroconversion sensitivity was slightly superior compared to other commercially available assays. An initial reactive rate of 0.2% (without HBsAg-confirmed positive samples of 0.17%) for the ARCHITECT HBsAg Qualitative assay was observed. As the new screening assay is a 1-step assay format, the “high-dose hook effect” was investigated to assess the risk of false-negative results, but even very high positive HBsAg samples obtained signals clearly above the cutoff. a Abbott GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden-Delkenheim, Germany b Instituto Português do Sangue, Porto, Portugal c SIMT Policlinico Umberto I Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-(0)6122/58-1409; fax: +49(0)6122/58-1473. PII: S0732-8893(11)00144-1 doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.03.022 © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 25, 2011 Report Share Posted July 25, 2011 http://www.dmidjournal.com/article/PIIS0732889311001441/abstract?rss=yes JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASE Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages 479-485 (August 2011) HBsAg blood screening and diagnosis: performance evaluation of the ARCHITECT HBsAg qualitative and ARCHITECT HBsAg qualitative confirmatory assays Christian Poppa, Doris Kramsa, Christian Beckerta, Carsten Buenninga, Lucinda Queirósb, Loredana Piroc, Marina Lucianic, Markus Roebbeckea, Hans- Kapprella Received 26 January 2011; accepted 28 March 2011. published online 09 June 2011. Abstract A low initial reactive rate for screening assays is important for time- and cost-effective infectious disease testing. Therefore, the new ARCHITECT HBsAg Qualitative screening assay, in conjunction with the new ARCHITECT HBsAg Qualitative Confirmatory assay, was introduced. As the role of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) as surrogate marker for HBV resolution and the monitoring of drug effectiveness are becoming increasingly important, the established ARCHITECT HBsAg Quantitative assay remains available on the market. Precision, sensitivity, and specificity of the newly developed screening assay were in the range of established HBsAg assays. Seroconversion sensitivity was slightly superior compared to other commercially available assays. An initial reactive rate of 0.2% (without HBsAg-confirmed positive samples of 0.17%) for the ARCHITECT HBsAg Qualitative assay was observed. As the new screening assay is a 1-step assay format, the “high-dose hook effect” was investigated to assess the risk of false-negative results, but even very high positive HBsAg samples obtained signals clearly above the cutoff. a Abbott GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden-Delkenheim, Germany b Instituto Português do Sangue, Porto, Portugal c SIMT Policlinico Umberto I Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-(0)6122/58-1409; fax: +49(0)6122/58-1473. PII: S0732-8893(11)00144-1 doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.03.022 © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.