Guest guest Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hep.24406/abstract Entecavir treatment for chronic hepatitis B: Adaptation is not needed for the majority of naïve patients with a partial virological response†‡ Roeland Zoutendijk1, Jurriën G. P. Reijnders1, Brown2, Fabien Zoulim3, Mutimer4, Katja Deterding5, Jörg sen6, Wolf Hofmann7, Buti8, Santantonio9, Florian van Bömmel10, Pierre Pradat3, Ye Oo4, Marc Luetgehetmann11, Berg10, Bettina E. Hansen1, Heiner Wedemeyer5, Harry L. A. Janssen1,*,§, for the VIRGIL Surveillance Study GroupArticle first published online: 25 JUL 2011 DOI: 10.1002/hep.24406 Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Issue Hepatology Volume 54, Issue 2, pages 443–451, August 2011 Abstract Entecavir (ETV) is a potent inhibitor of viral replication in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naïve chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the long term efficacy and safety of ETV in NA-naïve CHB patients, particularly in those with detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA after 48 weeks, in whom treatment adaptation is suggested by current guidelines. In a multicenter cohort study, we investigated 333 CHB patients treated with entecavir monotherapy. The NA-naïve population consisted of 243 patients, whereas 90 were NA-experienced. Virological response (VR) (HBV DNA <80 IU/mL) was achieved in 48%, 76%, and 90% of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and in 89%, 98%, and 99% of HBeAg-negative NA-naïve patients at weeks 48, 96, and 144, respectively. Thirty-six of 175 (21%) NA-naïve patients with at least 48 weeks of follow-up had a detectable load at week 48 (partial virological response [PVR]). Twenty-nine (81%) patients with PVR reached VR during prolonged ETV monotherapy, and none of them developed ETV-resistance. Among 22 patients with HBV DNA <1,000 IU/mL at week 48, VR was achieved in 21 (95%) patients, compared with eight of 14 (57%) patients with HBV DNA ≥1,000 IU/mL. Continuous HBV DNA decline was observed in most patients without VR during follow-up, and in three patients adherence was suboptimal according to the treating physician. ETV was safe and did not affect renal function or cause lactic acidosis. Conclusion: ETV monotherapy can be continued in NA-naïve patients with detectable HBV DNA at week 48, particularly in those with a low viral load because long-term ETV leads to a virological response in the vast majority of patients. (HEPATOLOGY 2011;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hep.24406/abstract Entecavir treatment for chronic hepatitis B: Adaptation is not needed for the majority of naïve patients with a partial virological response†‡ Roeland Zoutendijk1, Jurriën G. P. Reijnders1, Brown2, Fabien Zoulim3, Mutimer4, Katja Deterding5, Jörg sen6, Wolf Hofmann7, Buti8, Santantonio9, Florian van Bömmel10, Pierre Pradat3, Ye Oo4, Marc Luetgehetmann11, Berg10, Bettina E. Hansen1, Heiner Wedemeyer5, Harry L. A. Janssen1,*,§, for the VIRGIL Surveillance Study GroupArticle first published online: 25 JUL 2011 DOI: 10.1002/hep.24406 Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Issue Hepatology Volume 54, Issue 2, pages 443–451, August 2011 Abstract Entecavir (ETV) is a potent inhibitor of viral replication in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naïve chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the long term efficacy and safety of ETV in NA-naïve CHB patients, particularly in those with detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA after 48 weeks, in whom treatment adaptation is suggested by current guidelines. In a multicenter cohort study, we investigated 333 CHB patients treated with entecavir monotherapy. The NA-naïve population consisted of 243 patients, whereas 90 were NA-experienced. Virological response (VR) (HBV DNA <80 IU/mL) was achieved in 48%, 76%, and 90% of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and in 89%, 98%, and 99% of HBeAg-negative NA-naïve patients at weeks 48, 96, and 144, respectively. Thirty-six of 175 (21%) NA-naïve patients with at least 48 weeks of follow-up had a detectable load at week 48 (partial virological response [PVR]). Twenty-nine (81%) patients with PVR reached VR during prolonged ETV monotherapy, and none of them developed ETV-resistance. Among 22 patients with HBV DNA <1,000 IU/mL at week 48, VR was achieved in 21 (95%) patients, compared with eight of 14 (57%) patients with HBV DNA ≥1,000 IU/mL. Continuous HBV DNA decline was observed in most patients without VR during follow-up, and in three patients adherence was suboptimal according to the treating physician. ETV was safe and did not affect renal function or cause lactic acidosis. Conclusion: ETV monotherapy can be continued in NA-naïve patients with detectable HBV DNA at week 48, particularly in those with a low viral load because long-term ETV leads to a virological response in the vast majority of patients. (HEPATOLOGY 2011;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hep.24406/abstract Entecavir treatment for chronic hepatitis B: Adaptation is not needed for the majority of naïve patients with a partial virological response†‡ Roeland Zoutendijk1, Jurriën G. P. Reijnders1, Brown2, Fabien Zoulim3, Mutimer4, Katja Deterding5, Jörg sen6, Wolf Hofmann7, Buti8, Santantonio9, Florian van Bömmel10, Pierre Pradat3, Ye Oo4, Marc Luetgehetmann11, Berg10, Bettina E. Hansen1, Heiner Wedemeyer5, Harry L. A. Janssen1,*,§, for the VIRGIL Surveillance Study GroupArticle first published online: 25 JUL 2011 DOI: 10.1002/hep.24406 Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Issue Hepatology Volume 54, Issue 2, pages 443–451, August 2011 Abstract Entecavir (ETV) is a potent inhibitor of viral replication in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naïve chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the long term efficacy and safety of ETV in NA-naïve CHB patients, particularly in those with detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA after 48 weeks, in whom treatment adaptation is suggested by current guidelines. In a multicenter cohort study, we investigated 333 CHB patients treated with entecavir monotherapy. The NA-naïve population consisted of 243 patients, whereas 90 were NA-experienced. Virological response (VR) (HBV DNA <80 IU/mL) was achieved in 48%, 76%, and 90% of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and in 89%, 98%, and 99% of HBeAg-negative NA-naïve patients at weeks 48, 96, and 144, respectively. Thirty-six of 175 (21%) NA-naïve patients with at least 48 weeks of follow-up had a detectable load at week 48 (partial virological response [PVR]). Twenty-nine (81%) patients with PVR reached VR during prolonged ETV monotherapy, and none of them developed ETV-resistance. Among 22 patients with HBV DNA <1,000 IU/mL at week 48, VR was achieved in 21 (95%) patients, compared with eight of 14 (57%) patients with HBV DNA ≥1,000 IU/mL. Continuous HBV DNA decline was observed in most patients without VR during follow-up, and in three patients adherence was suboptimal according to the treating physician. ETV was safe and did not affect renal function or cause lactic acidosis. Conclusion: ETV monotherapy can be continued in NA-naïve patients with detectable HBV DNA at week 48, particularly in those with a low viral load because long-term ETV leads to a virological response in the vast majority of patients. (HEPATOLOGY 2011;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hep.24406/abstract Entecavir treatment for chronic hepatitis B: Adaptation is not needed for the majority of naïve patients with a partial virological response†‡ Roeland Zoutendijk1, Jurriën G. P. Reijnders1, Brown2, Fabien Zoulim3, Mutimer4, Katja Deterding5, Jörg sen6, Wolf Hofmann7, Buti8, Santantonio9, Florian van Bömmel10, Pierre Pradat3, Ye Oo4, Marc Luetgehetmann11, Berg10, Bettina E. Hansen1, Heiner Wedemeyer5, Harry L. A. Janssen1,*,§, for the VIRGIL Surveillance Study GroupArticle first published online: 25 JUL 2011 DOI: 10.1002/hep.24406 Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Issue Hepatology Volume 54, Issue 2, pages 443–451, August 2011 Abstract Entecavir (ETV) is a potent inhibitor of viral replication in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naïve chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the long term efficacy and safety of ETV in NA-naïve CHB patients, particularly in those with detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA after 48 weeks, in whom treatment adaptation is suggested by current guidelines. In a multicenter cohort study, we investigated 333 CHB patients treated with entecavir monotherapy. The NA-naïve population consisted of 243 patients, whereas 90 were NA-experienced. Virological response (VR) (HBV DNA <80 IU/mL) was achieved in 48%, 76%, and 90% of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and in 89%, 98%, and 99% of HBeAg-negative NA-naïve patients at weeks 48, 96, and 144, respectively. Thirty-six of 175 (21%) NA-naïve patients with at least 48 weeks of follow-up had a detectable load at week 48 (partial virological response [PVR]). Twenty-nine (81%) patients with PVR reached VR during prolonged ETV monotherapy, and none of them developed ETV-resistance. Among 22 patients with HBV DNA <1,000 IU/mL at week 48, VR was achieved in 21 (95%) patients, compared with eight of 14 (57%) patients with HBV DNA ≥1,000 IU/mL. Continuous HBV DNA decline was observed in most patients without VR during follow-up, and in three patients adherence was suboptimal according to the treating physician. ETV was safe and did not affect renal function or cause lactic acidosis. Conclusion: ETV monotherapy can be continued in NA-naïve patients with detectable HBV DNA at week 48, particularly in those with a low viral load because long-term ETV leads to a virological response in the vast majority of patients. (HEPATOLOGY 2011;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.